Computational Models of Music Cognition

The Psychology of Music

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 327-368

  Temperley, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84884439142     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-381460-9.00008-0     Document Type: Chapter

References (144)

1. Baroni M., Jacobini R. Proposal for a grammar of melody 1978, Les Presses de l'Université de Montreal, Montreal, Canada.
2. Bharucha J.J. Music cognition and perceptual facilitation: A connectionist framework. Music Perception 1987, 5:1-30.
3. Bigand E., Parncutt R. Perceiving musical tension in long chord sequences. Psychological Research 1999, 62:237-254.
4. Biles J.A. GenJam: A genetic algorithm for generating Jazz solos. Proceedings of the 1994 International Computer Music Conference 1994, International Computer Music Association, San Francisco, CA.
5. Bod R. A unified model of structural organization in language and music. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 2002, 17:289-308.
6. Bresin R. Artificial neural networks based models for automatic performance of musical scores. Journal of New Music Research 1998, 27:239-270.
7. Brooks F.P., Hopkins A.L., Neumann P.G., Wright W.V. An experiment in musical composition. IRE Transactions on Computers 1957, EC-6:175-182.
8. Bruderer M.J., McKinney M.E., Kohlrausch A. The perception of structural boundaries in polyphonic representations of Western popular music. Musicae Scientiae, Discussion Forum 2010, 5:115-155.
9. Butler D. Describing the perception of tonality in music: A critique of the tonal hierarchy theory and a proposal for a theory of intervallic rivalry. Music Perception 1989, 6:219-242.
10. Cambouropoulos E. Musical rhythm: A formal model for determining local boundaries, accents and metre in a melodic surface. Music, gestalt, and computing 1997, 277-293. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany. M. Leman (Ed.).
11. Cambouropoulos E. Pitch spelling: A computational model. Music Perception 2003, 20:411-429.
12. Cambouropoulos E. Musical parallelism and melodic segmentation: A computational approach. Music Perception 2006, 23:249-267.
13. Cemgil A.T., Desain P., Kappen B. Rhythm quantization for transcription. Computer Music Journal 2000, 24/2:60-76.
14. Cemgil A.T., Kappen B., Desain P., Honing H. On Tempo tracking: Tempogram representation and Kalman filtering. Journal of New Music Research 2000, 29:259-273.
15. Chai W. Melody as a significant musical feature in repertory classification. Computing in Musicology 2004, 13:51-72.
16. Chew E. The spiral array: An algorithm for determining key boundaries. Music and artificial intelligence 2002, 18-31. Springer, Berlin, Germany. C. Anagnostopoulou, M. Ferrand, A. Smaill (Eds.).
17. Chew E., Chen Y.-C. Real-time pitch spelling using the Spiral Array. Computer Music Journal 2005, 29:61-76.
18. Conklin D., Anagnostopoulou C. Segmental pattern discovery in music. INFORMS Journal of Computing 2006, 18:285-293.
19. Conklin D., Bergeron M. Feature set patterns in music. Computer Music Journal 2008, 32/1:60-70.
20. Conklin D., Witten I. Multiple viewpoint systems for music prediction. Journal of New Music Research 1995, 24:51-73.
21. Cope D. The algorithmic composer 2000, A-R Editions, Madison, WI.
22. Cope D. Computer models of musical creativity 2005, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
23. Cuddy L.L. Tonal relations. Perception and cognition of music 1997, 329-352. Taylor & Francis, London, England. I. Deliege, J. Sloboda (Eds.).
24. Cuddy L.L., Lunney C.A. Expectancies generated by melodic intervals: Perceptual judgments of melodic continuity. Perception&Psychophysics 1995, 57:451-462.
25. Dannenberg R.B., Derenyi I. Combining instrument and performance models for high quality music synthesis. Journal of New Music Research 1998, 27:211-238.
26. de Cheveigne A. Pitch perception models. Pitch: Neural coding and perception 2005, 169-233. Springer, Berlin, Germany. C.J. Plack, A.J. Oxenham, R.R. Fay, A.N. Popper (Eds.).
27. Deliège I. Prototype effects in music listening: An empirical approach to the notion of imprint. Music Perception 2001, 18:371-407.
28. Desain P., Honing H. The quantization of musical time: A connectionist approach. Computer Music Journal 1989, 13/3:56-66.
29. Deutsch D. The processing of structured and unstructured tonal sequences. Perception & Psychophysics 1980, 28:381-389.
30. Dixon S. Automatic extraction of tempo and beat from expressive performances. Journal of New Music Research 2001, 30:39-58.
31. Dixon S. Evaluation of the audio beat tracking system BeatRoot. Journal of New Music Research 2007, 36:39-50.
32. Dowling W.J. Scale and contour: Two components of a theory of memory for melodies. Psychological Review 1978, 85:341-354.
33. Downie S. The Music Information Retrieval Evaluation eXchange (MIREX). D-Lib Magazine 2006, 12/12. ().
34. Ebcioglu K. An expert system for harmonizing four-part chorales. Computer Music Journal 1988, 12/3:43-51.
35. Eck D. A positive-evidence model for rhythmical beat induction. Journal of New Music Research 2001, 30:187-200.
36. Eerola T., Järvinen T., Louhivuori J., Toiviainen P. Statistical features and perceived similarity of folk melodies. Music Perception 2001, 18:275-296.
37. Frankland B.W., Cohen A.J. Parsing of melody: Quantification and testing of the local grouping rules of "Lerdahl and Jackendoff's A Generative Theory of Tonal Music". Music Perception 2004, 21:499-543.
38. Franklin J.A. Recurrent neural networks for music computation. INFORMS Journal on Music Computing 2006, 18:321-338.
39. Friberg A., Bresin R., Sundberg J. Overview of the KTH rule system for muical performance. Advances in Cognitive Psychology 2006, 2:145-161.
40. Fujinaga I. Machine recognition of timbre using steady state tone of acoustic musical instruments. Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference 1998, International Computer Music Association, San Francisco, CA.
41. Gabrielsson A. Studies in rhythm. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis 1973, 7:3-19.
42. Gasser M., Eck D., Port R.F. Meter as mechanism: A neural network that learns metrical patterns. Connection Science 1999, 11:187-216.
43. Gjerdingen R.O. Apparent motion in music?. Music Perception 1994, 11:335-370.
44. Goto M. An audio-based real-time beat tracking system for music with or without drum-sounds. Journal of New Music Research 2001, 30:159-171.
45. Gouyon F., Dixon S. A review of automatic rhythm description systems. Computer Music Journal 2005, 29/1:34-54.
46. Gouyon F., Herrera P. Determination of the meter of musical audio signals: Seeking recurrences in beat segment descriptors. Proceedings of the 2003 Audio Engineering Society Convention 2003, Audio Engineering Society, New York, NY.
47. Grey J. Multidimensional perceptual scaling of musical timbres. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1977, 61:1270-1277.
48. Hamanaka M., Hirata K., Tojo S. Implementing 'a generative theory of tonal music.'. Journal of New Music Research 2006, 35:249-277.
49. Hamanaka M., Tojo S. Interactive GTTM analyzer. Proceedings of the International Conference for Music Information Retrieval. 2009, International Society for Music Information Retrieval. ().
50. Hiller L.A., Isaacson L.M. Experimental music 1959, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
51. Huron D., Parncutt R. An improved model of tonality perception incorporating pitch salience and echoic memory. Psychomusicology 1993, 12:154-171.
52. Jones M.R., Moynihan H., MacKenzie N., Puente J. Temporal aspects of stimulus-driven attending in dynamic arrays. Psychological Science 2002, 13:313-319.
53. Juhasz Z. Contour analysis of Hungarian folk music in a multidimensional metric-space. Journal of New Music Research 2000, 29:71-83.
54. Kashino K., Nakadai K., Kinoshita T., Tanaka H. Application of Bayesian probability networks to musical scene analysis. Computational auditory scene analysis 1998, 115-137. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. D. Rosenthal, H. Okuno (Eds.).
55. Kassler M. Explication of the middleground of Schenker's theory of tonality. Miscellanea Musicologica 1977, 9:72-81.
56. Kilian J., Hoos H. Voice separation: A local optimisation approach. Proceedings of the International Conference for Music Information Retrieval. 2002, International Society for Music Information Retrieval. ().
57. Kirlin P.B., Utgoff P.E. VOISE: Learning to segregate voices in explicit and implicit polyphony. Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval. 2005, International Society for Music Information Retrieval. ().
58. Kirlin P.B., Utgoff P.E. An framework for automated Schenkerian analysis. Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval. 2008, International Society for Music Information Retrieval. ().
59. Klapuri A.P. Automatic music transcription as we know it today. Journal of New Music Research 2004, 33:269-282.
60. Krumhansl C.L. Cognitive foundations of musical pitch 1990, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
61. Krumhansl C.L. Music psychology and music theory: Problems and prospects. Music Theory Spectrum 1995, 17:53-80.
62. Krumhansl C.L., Kessler E.J. Tracing the dynamic changes in perceived tonal organization in a spatial representation of musical keys. Psychological Review 1982, 89:334-368.
63. Lamont A., Dibben N. Motivic structure and the perception of similarity. Music Perception 2001, 18:245-274.
64. Large E.W., Jones M.R. The dynamics of attending: How people track time varying events. Psychological Review 1999, 106:119-159.
65. Large E.W., Kolen J.F. Resonance and the perception of musical meter. Connection Science 1994, 6:177-208.
66. Larson S. Musical forces and melodic patterns. Theory and Practice 1997-1998, 22-23:55-71.
67. Larson S. Musical forces and melodic expectations: Comparing computer models and experimental results. Music Perception 2004, 21:457-498.
68. Lartillot O., St.James E. Automating motivic analysis through the application of perceptual rules. Computing in Musicology 2004, 13:73-91.
69. Lee C. The perception of metrical structure: Experimental evidence and a model. Representing musical structure 1991, 59-127. Academic Press, London, England. P. Howell, R. West, I. Cross (Eds.).
70. Leman M. Music and schema theory 1995, Springer, Berlin, Germany.
71. Lerdahl F. Tonal pitch space 2001, Oxford University Press, Oxford, England.
72. Lerdahl F., Jackendoff R. A generative theory of tonal music 1983, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
73. Lerdahl F., Krumhansl C.L. Modeling tonal tension. Music Perception 2007, 24:329-366.
74. Longuet-Higgins H.C., Steedman M.J. On interpreting Bach. Machine Intelligence 1971, 6:221-241.
75. Margulis E.H. A model of melodic expectation. Music Perception 2005, 4:663-714.
76. Marr D. Vision 1982, Freeman, New York, NY.
77. Marsden A. Modelling the perception of musical voices: A case study in rule-based systems. Computer representations and models in music 1992, 239-263. Academic Press, London, England. A. Marsden, A. Pople (Eds.).
78. Marsden A. Schenkerian analysis by computer: A proof of concept. Journal of New Music Research 2010, 39:269-289.
79. Matsunaga A., Abe J. Cues for key perception of a melody: Pitch set alone?. Music Perception 2005, 23:153-164.
80. Mavromatis P. A hidden Markov model of melody production in Greek church chant. Computing in Musicology 2005, 14:93-112.
81. Mavromatis P. Minimum description length modeling of musical structure. Journal of Mathematics and Music 2009, 3:117-136.
82. Maxwell H.J. An expert system for harmonic analysis of tonal music. Understanding music with AI 1992, 335-353. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. M. Balaban, K. Ebcioglu, O. Laske (Eds.).
83. Mazzola G., Zahorka O. Tempo curves revisited: Hierarchies of performance fields. Computer Music Journal 1994, 18/1:40-52.
84. McAuley, J. D. (1995). Perception of time as phase: Toward an adaptive-oscillator model of rhythmic pattern processing (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Indiana University, Bloomington.
85. McAuley J.D., Semple P. The effect of tempo and musical experience on perceived beat. Australian Journal of Psychology 1999, 51:176-187.
86. Meredith D. The p13 pitch spelling algorithm. Journal of New Music Research 2006, 35:121-159.
87. Meredith D., Lemström K., Wiggins G. Algorithms for discovering repeated patterns in representations of polyphonic music. Journal of New Music Research 2002, 31:321-345.
88. Monahan C.B., Carterette E.C. Pitch and duration as determinants of musical space. Music Perception 1985, 3:1-32.
89. Mozer M.C. Neural network music composition by prediction: Exploring the benefits of psychophysical constraints and multiscale processing. Connection Science 1994, 6:247-280.
90. Müllensiefen D., Frieler K. Cognitive adequacy in the measurement of melodic similarity: Algorithmic vs. human judgments. Computing in Musicology 2004, 13:147-176.
91. Müller S., Mazzola G. The extraction of expressive shaping in performance. Computer Music Journal 2003, 27/1:47-58.
92. Narmour E. The analysis and cognition of basic melodic structures: The implication-realization model 1990, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
93. Özcan E., Erçal T. A genetic algorithm for generating improvised music. Lecture notes in computer science: Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference on Artificial Evolution 2008, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, (pp. 266-277).
94. Pachet F. Interacting with a musical learning system: The continuator. Music and artificial intelligence 2002, 119-132. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany. C. Anagnostopoulou, M. Ferrand, A. Smaill (Eds.).
95. Palmer C., Krumhansl K. Pitch and temporal contributions to musical phrase perception: Effects of harmony, performance timing, and familiarity. Perception & Psychophysics 1987, 41:505-518.
96. Palmer C., Pfordresher P.Q. Incremental planning in sequence production. Psychological Review 2003, 110:683-712.
97. Pardo B., Birmingham W.P. Algorithms for chordal analysis. Computer Music Journal 2002, 26/2:27-49.
98. Pardo B., Shifrin J., Birmingham W. Name that tune: A pilot study in finding a melody from a sung query. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2004, 55:283-300.
99. Parncutt R. Harmony: A psychoacoustical approach 1989, Springer, Berlin, Germany.
100. Parncutt R. A perceptual model of pulse salience and metrical accent in musical rhythms. Music Perception 1994, 11:409-464.
101. Parncutt R., Sloboda J.A., Clarke E., Raekallio M., Desain P. An ergonomic model of keyboard fingering for melodic fragments. Music Perception 1997, 14:341-382.
102. Pearce M., Wiggins G. Improved methods for statistical modelling of monophonic music. Journal of New Music Research 2004, 33:367-385.
103. Pearce M., Wiggins G. Expectation in melody: The influence of context and learning. Music Perception 2006, 23:340-377.
104. Pfordresher P.Q., Palmer C., Jungers M. Speed, accuracy, and serial order in sequence production. Cognitive Science 2007, 31:63-98.
105. Pinkerton R.C. Information theory and melody. Scientific American 1956, 194:77-86.
106. Ponsford D., Wiggins G., Mellish C. Statistical learning of harmonic movement. Journal of New Music Research 1999, 28:150-177.
107. Povel D.-J., Essens P. Perception of temporal patterns. Music Perception 1985, 2:411-440.
108. Radicioni D.P., Lombardo V. Computational modeling of chord fingering for string instruments. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference of the Cognitive Science Society 2005, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
109. Raphael C. A Bayesian network for real-time musical accompaniment. Neural Information Processing Systems 2001, 14:1433-1439.
110. Raphael C. A hybrid graphical model for rhythmic parsing. Artificial Intelligence 2002, 137:217-238.
111. Raphael C., Stoddard J. Functional harmonic analysis using probabilistic models. Computer Music Journal 2004, 28/3:45-52.
112. Rolland P.-Y. Discovering patterns in musical sequences. Journal of New Music Research 1999, 28:334-350.
113. Rosenthal D. Emulation of human rhythm perception. Computer Music Journal 1992, 16/1:64-76.
114. Computational auditory scene analysis 1998, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ. D.F. Rosenthal, H.G. Okuno (Eds.).
115. Rothgeb J. Simulating musical skills by digital computer. Computer Music Journal 1980, 4/2:36-40.
116. Sadakata M., Desain P., Honing H. The Bayesian way to relate rhythm perception and production. Music Perception 2006, 23:269-288.
117. Sayegh S. Fingering for string instrument with the optimum path paradigm. Computer Music Journal 1989, 13(3):76-84.
118. Scheirer E.D. Tempo and beat analysis of acoustic musical signals. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1998, 103:588-601.
119. Schellenberg E.G. Simplifying the implication-realization model of melodic expectancy. Music Perception 1997, 14:295-318.
120. Schenker, H. (1935/1979). Free composition (E. Oster, Trans., Ed.). New York, NY: Longman.
121. Schmuckler M. Testing models of melodic contour similarity. Music Perception 1999, 16:295-326.
122. Shmulevich I., Yli-Harja O. Localized key-finding: Algorithms and applications. Music Perception 2000, 17:65-100.
123. Smoliar S. A computer aid for Schenkerian analysis. Computer Music Journal 1980, 4/2:41-59.
124. Steedman M. The perception of musical rhythm and meter. Perception 1977, 6:555-570.
125. Sundberg J. Computer synthesis of music performance. Generative processes in music 1988, 52-69. Clarendon Press, Oxford, England. J.A. Sloboda (Ed.).
126. Temperley D. The cognition of basic musical structures 2001, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
127. Temperley D. Music and probability 2007, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
128. Temperley D., Sleator D. Modeling meter and harmony: A preference-rule approach. Computer Music Journal 1999, 23/1:10-27.
129. Tenney J., Polansky L. Temporal Gestalt perception in music. Journal of Music Theory 1980, 24:205-241.
130. Terhardt E. Pitch, consonance and harmony. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1974, 55:1061-1069.
131. Tillmann B., Bharucha J.J., Bigand E. Implicit learning of tonality: A self-organizing approach. Psychological Review 2000, 107:885-913.
132. Todd N.P.M. A computational model of rubato. Contemporary Music Review 1989, 3:69-88.
133. Todd N.P.M. The dynamics of dynamics: A model of musical expression. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1992, 91:3540-3550.
134. Todd P.M. A connectionist approach to algorithmic composition. Computer Music Journal 1989, 13/4:27-43.
135. Toiviainen P. Real-time recognition of improvisations with adaptive oscillators and a recursive Bayesian classifier. Journal of New Music Research 2001, 30:137-148.
136. Toiviainen P., Krumhansl C. Measuring and modeling real-time responses to music: The dynamics of tonality induction. Perception 2003, 32:741-766.
137. Typke R., Giannopoulos P., Veltkamp R., Wiering F., van Oostrum R. Using transportation distances for measuring melodic similarity. Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval. 2003, International Society for Music Information Retrieval. ().
138. Tzanetakis G., Kapur A., Schloss W.A., Wright M. Computational ethnomusicology. Journal of Interdisciplinary Music Studies 2007, 1:1-24.
139. Vos P. Key implications of ascending fourth and descending fifth openings. Psychology of Music 1999, 27:4-17.
140. Vos P.G., Van Geenen E.W. A parallel-processing key-finding model. Music Perception 1996, 14:185-224.
141. Winograd T. Linguistics and the computer analysis of tonal harmony. Journal of Music Theory 1968, 12:2-49.
142. Widmer G. Machine discoveries: A few simple, robust local expression principles. Journal of New Music Research 2002, 31:37-50.
143. Widmer G., Tobudic A. Playing Mozart by analogy: Learning multi-level timing and dynamics strategies. Journal of New Music Research 2003, 32:259-268.
144. Windsor L.W., Clarke E.F. Expressive timing and dynamics in real and artificial musical performances: Using an algorithm as an analytical tool. Music Perception 1997, 15:127-152.