Cues for key perception of a melody: Pitch set alone?

Music Perception

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 153-164

  Matsunaga, Rie ^a   Abe, Jun Ichi ^a  

^a HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33847700097     PISSN: 07307829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1525/mp.2005.23.2.153     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Abe, J. (1987a). How is a melody processed? In G. Hatano (Ed.), Music and cognition (pp. 41-68). Tokyo: Tokyo University Press. (In Japanese.)
2. Abe, J. (1987b). Perception and prediction of melody: Simulation of the final-tone extrapolating behavior. The Japanese Journal of Psychology, 58, 275-281. (In Japanese with English abstract.)
3. Abe, J. (2002). Cognitive processes of metrical and tonal organizations in music perception. Brain Science, 24, 907-913. (In Japanese.)
4. Abe, J., & Hoshino, E. (1990). Schema driven properties in melody cognition: Experiments on final tone extrapolation by music experts. Psychomusicology, 9, 161-172.
5. Abe, J., & Okada, A. (2004). Integration of metrical and tonal organization in melody perception. Japanese Psychological Research, 46, 298-307.
6. Auhagen, W., & Vos, P. G. (2000). Experimental methods in tonality induction research: A review. Music Perception, 17, 417-436.
7. Bharucha, J. J. (1984). Anchoring effects in music: The resolution of dissonance. Cognitive Psychology, 16, 485-518.
8. Brown, H. (1988). The interplay of set content and temporal context in a functional theory of tonality perception. Music Perception, 5, 219-250.
9. Brown, H., & Butler, D. (1981). Diatonic trichords as minimal tonal cu-cells. In Theory Only, 5(6&7), 39-55.
10. Brown, H., Butler, D., & Jones, M. R. (1994). Musical and temporal influences on key discovery Music Perception, 11, 371-402.
11. Browne, R. (1981). Tonal implications of the diatonic set. In Theory Only, 5(6&7), 3-21.
12. Butler, D. (1989). Describing the perception of tonality in music: A critique of the tonal hierarchy theory and a proposal for a theory of intervallic rivalry. Music Perception, 6, 219-242.
13. Butler, D. (1990a). A study of event hierarchies in tonal and post-tonal music. Psychology of Music, 18, 4-17.
14. Butler, D. (1990b). Response to Carol Krumhansl. Music Perception, 7, 325-338.
15. Butler, D., & Brown, H. (1984). Tonal structure versus function: Studies of the recognition of harmonic motion. Music Perception, 2, 6-24.
16. Butler, D., & Brown, H. (1994). Describing the mental representation of tonality in music. In R. Aiello (Ed.), Musical perceptions (pp. 191-212). New York: Oxford University Press.
17. Cohen, A. J. (2000). Development of tonality induction: Plasticity, exposure, and training. Music Perception, 17, 437-459.
18. Cross, I., Howell, P. & West, R. (1983). Preferences for scale structure in melodic sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 444-460.
19. Cuddy, L. L. (1991). Melodic patterns and tonal structure: Converging evidence. Psychomusicology, 10, 104-126.
20. Cuddy, L. L., & Badertscher, B. (1987). Recovery of the tonal hierarchy: Some comparisons across age and levels of musical experience. Perception and Psychophysics, 41, 609-620.
21. Cuddy, L. L. & Lunney, C. A. (1995). Expectancies generated by melodic intervals: Perceptual judgments of melodic continuity. Perception and Psychophysics, 57, 451-462.
22. Cuddy, L. L., Cohen, A. J., & Mewhort, D. J. K. (1981). Perception of structure in short melodic sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 869-883.
23. Deutsch, D. (1984). Two issues concerning tonal hierarchies: Comment on Castellano, Bharucha, and Krumhansl. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 413-416.
24. Deutsch, D. (1999). The processing of pitch combinations. In D. Deutsch (Ed.), The psychology of music (2nd ed.). (pp. 349-412). New York: Academic Press.
25. Dowling, W. J. (1991). Tonal strength and melody recognition after long and short delays. Perception and Psychophysics, 50, 305-303.
26. Hoshino, E., & Abe, J. (1981). Tonality and the coherence in melody cognition. (Hokkaido Behavioral Science Report Series P No. 23). Sapporo, Japan: Hokkaido University, Department of Psychology. (In Japanese.)
27. Hoshino, E., & Abe, J. (1984). "Tonality" and the final tone extrapolation in melody cognition. The Japanese Journal of Psychology, 54, 344-350. (In Japanese with English abstract.)
28. Huovinen, E. (2002). Pitch-class constellations: Studies in the perception of tonal centricity. Turku: Suomen Musiikkitieteellinen Seura.
29. Huron, D., & Parncutt, R. (1993). An improved model of tonality perception incorporating pitch salience and echo memory. Psychomusicology, 12, 154-171.
30. Krumhansl, C. L. (1979). The psychological representation of musical pitch in a tonal context. Cognitive Psychology, 11, 346-374.
31. Krumhansl, C. L. (1990). Cognitive foundations of musical pitch. New York: Oxford University Press.
32. Krumhansl, C. L. (2000). Tonality induction: A statistical approach applied cross-culturally. Music Perception, 17, 461-479.
33. Krumhansl, C. L., & Kessler, E. J. (1982). Tracing the dynamic changes in perceived tonal organization in a spatial representation of musical keys. Psychological Review, 89, 334-368.
34. Krumhansl, C. L., & Shepard, R. N. (1979). Quantification of the hierarchy of tonal functions within a diatonic context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 579-594.
35. Lamont, A. (1998). Music, education, and the development of pitch perception: The role of context, age and musical experience. Psychology of Music, 26, 7-25.
36. Longuet-Higgins, H. C., & Steedman, M. J. (1987). On interpreting Bach. In H. C. Longuet-Higgins (Ed.), Mental processes: Studies in cognitive science (pp. 82-104). London: MIT Press. (Original work published 1971)
37. Matsunaga, R., & Abe, J. (2002). Perceptual cues and key judgment: The effect of specific intervals (IPSJ SIG Notes Music and Computer No. 45-8). Tokyo, Japan: Information Processing Society of Japan. (In Japanese with English abstract.)
38. Matsunaga, R., & Abe, J. (2004). Sequential characteristics as perceptual cues for key identification (Tech. Rcp. No. 34). Sapporo, Japan: Hokkaido University, Department of Psychology. (In Japanese.)
39. Oram, N., & Cuddy, L. L. (1995). Responsiveness of Western adults to pitch-distributional information in melodic sequences. Psychological Research, 57, 103-118.
40. Parncutt, R., & Bregman, S. A. (2000). Tone profiles following short chord progressions: Top-down or bottom up? Music Perception, 18, 25-57.
41. Povel, D. J., & Jansen, E. (2001). Perceptual mechanisms in music processing. Music Perception, 19, 169-198.
42. Povel, D. J., & Jansen, E. (2002). Harmonic factors in the perception of tonal melodics. Music Perception, 20, 51-85.
43. Smith, J. D. (1997). The place of musical novices in music science. Music Perception, 14, 227-262.
44. Temperley, D. (1999). What's key for key? The Krumhansl-Schmuckler key-finding algorithm reconsidered. Music Perception, 17, 65-100.
45. Vos, P. G. (1999). Key implications of ascending forth and descending fifth openings. Psychology of Music, 27, 4-18.
46. Vos, P. G. (2000). Tonality induction: Theoretical problems and dilemmas. Music Perception, 17, 403-416.
47. Yoshino, I., & Abe, J. (2004). Cognitive modeling of key interpretation. Japanese Psychological Research, 46, 283-297.
48. West, R. J., & Fryer, R. (1990). Ratings of suitability of probe tones as tonics after random orderings of notes of the diatonic scale. Music Perception, 7, 253-258.