Exploring the relationship between teachers' curriculum enactment experience and their understanding of underlying unit structures

ICLS 2006 - International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Proceedings

Volumn 1, Issue , 2006, Pages 432-438

  Lin, Hsien Ta ^a   Fishman, Barry J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL INTERVIEW; CURRICULUM DESIGNS; DESIGN PRINCIPLES; FUTURE DESIGNS; PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT; TEACHERS'; UNIT STRUCTURE;

CURRICULA;

EID: 84884384005     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1996). Reform by the Book: What Is-Or Might Be-the Role of Curriculum Materials in Teacher Learning and Instructional Reform? Educational Researcher, 25(9), 6-8, 14.
2. Blumenfeld, P., Fishman, B. J., Krajcik, J., Marx, R. W., & Soloway, E. (2000). Creating usable innovations in systemic reform: scaling up technology-embedded project-based science in urban schools. Educational Psychologist, 35(3), 149-164.
3. Blumenfeld, P., Krajcik, J. S., Marx, R. W., & Soloway, E. (1994). Lessons learned: How collaboration helped middle grade science teachers learn project-based Instruction. Elementary SchoolJournal, 94(5), 539-551.
4. Blumenfeld, P., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3-4), 369-398.
5. Bransford, J. D., & Schwartz, D. (1999). Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications. In A. I.-N. P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 24, pp. 61-100). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
6. Brown, A. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141-178.
7. Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8. Chi, M. T. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(3), 271-315.
9. Cole, M. (1996). Cultural Psychology: A Once and Future Discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10. Collopy, R. (2003). Curriculum materials as a professional development tool: How a mathematics textbook affected two teachers' learning. Elementary School Journal, 103(3), 287-311.
11. Davis, E. A., & Krajcik, J. S. (2005). Designing Educative Curriculum Materials to Promote Teacher Learning. Educational Researcher, 34(3), 3-14.
12. Ginsburg, H. P. (1997). Entering the child's mind: the clinical interview in psychological research and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Grant, S. G., Peterson, P. L., & Shojgreen-Downer, A. (1996). Learning to teach mathematics in the context of systemic reform. American Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 509-541.
14. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge England: New York.
15. Lin, H. T., & Fishman, B. J. (2004). Supporting the scaling of innovations: Guiding teacher adaptation of materials by making implicit structures explicit. In Y. B. Kafai, W. A. Sandoval, N. Enyedy, A. S. Nixon & F. Herrera (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 617). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16. Lloyd, G. M. (1999). Two teachers' conceptions of a reform-oriented curriculum: Implications for mathematics teacher development. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 2(3), 227-252.
17. National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards: observe, interact, change, learn. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
18. Pea, R. (1993). Practices of distributed intelligence and designs for education. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognition: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 47-87). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
19. Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4-15.
20. Remillard, J. T. (2000). Can curriculum materials support teachers' learning? Two fourth-grade teachers' use of a new mathematics text. The Elementary School Journal, 100(4), 331-350.
21. Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers' use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211-246.
22. Richardson, V. (1990). Significant and worthwhile change in teaching practice. Educational Researcher, 19(7), 10-18.
23. Salomon, G. (1993). Distributed cognitions: psychological and educational considerations. Cambridge England: New York NY.
24. Schneider, R. M., & Krajcik, J. (2002). Supporting science teacher learning: The role of educative curriculum materials. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(3), 221-245.
25. Shulman, J. (1992). Case methods in teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.
26. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
27. Singer, J., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J., & Chambers, C. J. (2000). Constructing extended inquiry projects: Curriculum materials for science education reform. Educational Psychologist, 35(3), 165-178.
28. Spillane, J. P., Reiser, B. J., & Reimer, T. (2002). Policy implementation and cognition: Refraining and refocusing implementation research. Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 387-431.
29. Squire, K. D., MaKinster, J. G., Barnett, M., Luehmann, A. L., & Barab, S. L. (2003). Designed curriculum and local culture: Acknowledging the primacy of classroom culture. Science Education, 87(4), 468-489.
30. Talbert, J. E., McLaughlin, M. W., & Rowan, B. (1993). Understanding Context Effects on Secondary School Teaching. Teachers College Record, 95(1), 45-68.
31. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
32. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, U.K.: New YorkN.Y.