Development and validation of a new method of 3-dimensional assessment of glenoid and humeral component position after total shoulder arthroplasty

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

Volumn 22, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 1413-1422

  Iannotti, Joseph P ^a,b   Ricchetti, Eric T ^b   Rodriguez, Eric J ^b   Bryan, Jason A ^c  

^a CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c ImageIQ   (United States)

Author keywords

Anatomic Study; Basic Science; Computed tomography; Glenoid component; Humeral component; Imaging; Three dimensional; Total shoulder arthroplasty; Validation

Indexed keywords

TITANIUM;

ARM; ARTICLE; BODY POSITION; CADAVER; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; GLENOID CAVITY; HUMAN; HUMERUS; HUMERUS HEAD; IMPLANT; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; INTRARATER RELIABILITY; MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCAPULA; SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY; SHOULDER RADIOGRAPHY; SUPINE POSITION; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VALIDATION STUDY;

ANATOMIC STUDY; BASIC SCIENCE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; GLENOID COMPONENT; HUMERAL COMPONENT; IMAGING; THREE-DIMENSIONAL; TOTAL SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY; VALIDATION;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; HUMERUS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; JOINT PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SHOULDER JOINT; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84884353290     PISSN: 10582746     EISSN: 15326500     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.01.005     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Barrett J.F., Keat N. Artifacts in CT: recognition and avoidance. Radiographics 2004, 24:1679-1691. 10.1148/rg.246045065.
2. Bryce C.D., Davison A.C., Lewis G.S., Wang L., Flemming D.J., Armstrong A.D. Two-dimensional glenoid version measurements vary with coronal and sagittal scapular rotation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010, 92:692-699. 10.2106/JBJS.I.00177.
3. Bryce C.D., Davison A.C., Okita N., Lewis G.S., Sharkey N.A., Armstrong A.D. A biomechanical study of posterior glenoid bone loss and humeral head translation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2010, 19:994-1002. 10.1016/j.jse.2010.04.010.
4. Bryce C.D., Pennypacker J.L., Kulkarni N., Paul E.M., Hollenbeak C.S., Mosher T.J., et al. Validation of three-dimensional models of in situ scapulae. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2008, 17:825-832. 10.1016/j.jse.2008.01.141.
5. Budge M.D., Lewis G.S., Schaefer E., Coquia S., Flemming D.J., Armstrong A.D. Comparison of standard two-dimensional and three-dimensional corrected glenoid version measurements. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2011, 20:577-583. 10.1016/j.jse.2010.11.003.
6. Edwards T.B., Gartsman G.M., O'Connor D.P., Sarin V.K. Safety and utility of computer-aided shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2008, 17:503-508. 10.1016/j.jse.2007.10.005.
7. Gerber C., Costouros J.G., Sukthankar A., Fucentese S.F. Static posterior humeral head subluxation and total shoulder arthroplasty. J ShoulderElbow Surg 2009, 18:505-510. 10.1016/j.jse.2009.03.003.
8. Gregory T., Hansen U., Emery R., Amis A.A., Mutchler C., Taillieu F., et al. Total shoulder arthroplasty does not correct the orientation of the eroded glenoid. Acta Orthop 2012, 83:529-535. 10.3109/17453674.2012.733916.
9. Gregory T., Hansen U., Taillieu F., Baring T., Brassart N., Mutchler C., et al. Glenoid loosening after total shoulder arthroplasty: an invitro CT-scan study. J Orthop Res 2009, 27:1589-1595. 10.1002/jor.20912.
10. Habermeyer P., Magosch P., Lichtenberg S. Recentering the humeral head for glenoid deficiency in total shoulder arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007, 457:124-132. 10.1097/BLO.0b013e31802ff03c.
11. Hendel M.D., Bryan J.A., Barsoum W.K., Rodriguez E.J., Brems J.J., Evans P.J., et al. Comparison of patient-specific instruments with standard surgical instruments in determining glenoid component position: a randomized prospective clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012, 94:2167-2175. 10.2106/JBJS.K.01209.
12. Hirschmann M.T., Konala P., Amsler F., Iranpour F., Friederich N.F., Cobb J.P. The position and orientation of total knee replacement components: a comparison of conventional radiographs, transverse 2D-CT slices and 3D-CT reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011, 93:629-633. 10.1302/0301-620X.93B5.
13. Ho J.C., Youderian A., Davidson I.U., Bryan J.A., Iannotti J.P. Accuracy and reliability of postoperative radiographic measurements of glenoid anatomy and relationships in patients with total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2013, [Epub ahead of press]. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2012.11.015.
14. Hopkins A.R., Hansen U.N., Amis A.A., Emery R. The effects of glenoid component alignment variations on cement mantle stresses in total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2004, 13:668-675. 10.1016/j.jse.2004.04.008.
15. Iannotti J.P., Norris T.R. Influence of preoperative factors on outcome of shoulder arthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003, 85:251-258.
16. Jedenmalm A., Nilsson F., Noz M.E., Green D.D., Gedde U.W., Clarke I.C., et al. Validation of a 3D CT method for measurement of linear wear of acetabular cups. Acta Orthop 2011, 82:35-41. 10.3109/17453674.2011.552777.
17. Jedenmalm A., Noz M.E., Olivecrona H., Olivecrona L., Stark A. A new approach for assessment of wear in metal-backed acetabular cups using computed tomography: a phantom study with retrievals. Acta Orthop 2008, 79:218-224. 10.1080/17453670710015003.
18. Jeong J., Bryan J., Iannotti J.P. Effect of a variable prosthetic neck-shaft angle and the surgical technique on replication of normal humeral anatomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009, 91:1932-1941. 10.2106/JBJS.H.00729.
19. Kircher J., Wiedemann M., Magosch P., Lichtenberg S., Habermeyer P. Improved accuracy of glenoid positioning in total shoulder arthroplasty with intraoperative navigation: a prospective-randomized clinical study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2009, 18:515-520. 10.1016/j.jse.2009.03.014.
20. Kwon Y.W., Powell K.A., Yum J.K., Brems J.J., Iannotti J.P. Use of three-dimensional computed tomography for the analysis of the glenoid anatomy. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2005, 14:85-90. 10.1016/j.jse.2004.04.011.
21. Lacroix D., Murphy L.A., Prendergast P.J. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of glenoid replacement prostheses: a comparison of keeled and pegged anchorage systems. J Biomech Eng 2000, 122:430-436. 10.1115/1.1286318.
22. Lazarus M.D., Jensen K.L., Southworth C., Matsen F.A. The radiographic evaluation of keeled and pegged glenoid component insertion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002, 84:1174-1182.
23. Lee M.J., Kim S., Lee S.A., Song H.T., Huh Y.M., Kim D.H., et al. Overcoming artifacts from metallic orthopedic implants at high-field-strength MR imaging and multi-detector CT. Radiographics 2007, 27:791-803. 10.1148/rg.273065087.
24. Lewis M., Toms A.P., Reid K., Bugg W. CT metal artefact reduction of total knee prostheses using angled gantry multiplanar reformation. Knee 2010, 17:279-282. 10.1016/j.knee.2010.02.007.
25. Link T.M., Berning W., Scherf S., Joosten U., Joist A., Engelke K., et al. CT of metal implants: reduction of artifacts using an extended CT scale technique. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2000, 24:165-172.
26. Liu P.T., Pavlicek W.P., Peter M.B., Spangehl M.J., Roberts C.C., Paden R.G. Metal artifact reduction image reconstruction algorithm for CT of implanted metal orthopedic devices: a work in progress. Skeletal Radiol 2009, 38:797-802. 10.1007/s00256-008-0630-5.
27. Mahnken A.H., Raupach R., Wildberger J.E., Jung B., Heussen N., Flohr T.G., et al. A new algorithm for metal artifact reduction in computed tomography: invitro and invivo evaluation after total hip replacement. Invest Radiol 2003, 38:769-775. 10.1097/01.rli.0000086495.96457.54.
28. Mansat P., Briot J., Mansat M., Swider P. Evaluation of the glenoid implant survival using a biomechanical finite element analysis: influence of the implant design, bone properties, and loading location. JShoulder Elbow Surg 2007, 16:S79-S83. 10.1016/j.jse.2005.11.010.
29. Matsen F.A., Clinton J., Lynch J., Bertelsen A., Richardson M.L. Glenoid component failure in total shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008, 90:885-896. 10.2106/JBJS.G.01263.
30. Matziolis G., Krocker D., Weiss U., Tohtz S., Perka C. A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty. Three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007, 89:236-243. 10.2106/JBJS.F.00386.
31. Moon Y.W., Ha C.W., Do K.H., Kim C.Y., Han J.H., Na S.E., et al. Comparison of robot-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty: a controlled cadaver study using multiparameter quantitative three-dimensional CT assessment of alignment. Comput Aided Surg 2012, 17:86-95. 10.3109/10929088.2012.654408.
32. Nelder J.A., Mead R. A simplex method for function minimization. Comput J 1965, 7:308-313. 10.1093/comjnl/7.4.308.
33. Nguyen D., Ferreira L.M., Brownhill J.R., Faber K.J., Johnson J.A. Design and development of a computer assisted glenoid implantation technique for shoulder replacement surgery. Comput Aided Surg 2007, 12:152-159. 10.1080/10929080701374315.
34. Nguyen D., Ferreira L.M., Brownhill J.R., King G.J., Drosdowech D.S., Faber K.J., et al. Improved accuracy of computer assisted glenoid implantation in total shoulder arthroplasty: an in-vitro randomized controlled trial. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2009, 18:907-914. 10.1016/j.jse.2009.02.022.
35. Nyffeler R.W., Jost B., Pfirrmann C.W., Gerber C. Measurement of glenoid version: conventional radiographs versus computed tomography scans. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2003, 12:493-496. 10.1016/S1058274603001812.
36. Olivecrona H., Olivecrona L., Weidenhielm L., Noz M.E., Kardos J., Maguire G.Q., et al. A new technique for diagnosis of acetabular cup loosening using computed tomography: preliminary experience in 10 patients. Acta Orthop 2008, 79:346-353. 10.1080/17453670710015247.
37. Olivecrona L., Jedenmalm A., Aspelin P., Weidenhielm L., Noz M.E., Maguire G.Q., et al. Assessing wear of the acetabular cup using computed tomography: an exvivo study. Acta Radiol 2005, 46:852-857. 10.1080/02841850500271074.
38. Olivecrona L., Olivecrona H., Weidenhielm L., Noz M.E., Maguire G.Q., Zeleznik M.P. Model studies on acetabular component migration in total hip arthroplasty using CT and a semiautomated program for volume merging. Acta Radiol 2003, 44:419-429. 10.1034/j.1600-0455.2003.00086.x.
39. Pluim J.P., Maintz J.B., Viergever M.A. Mutual-information-based registration of medical images: a survey. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2003, 22:986-1004. 10.1109/TMI.2003.815867.
40. Rozing P.M., Obermann W.R. Osteometry of the glenohumeral joint. JShoulder Elbow Surg 1999, 8:438-442.
41. Scalise J.J., Codsi M.J., Bryan J., Iannotti J.P. The three-dimensional glenoid vault model can estimate normal glenoid version in osteoarthritis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2008, 17:487-491. 10.1016/j.jse.2007.09.006.
42. Shapiro T.A., McGarry M.H., Gupta R., Lee Y.S., Lee T.Q. Biomechanical effects of glenoid retroversion in total shoulder arthroplasty. JShoulder Elbow Surg 2007, 16:S90-S95. 10.1016/j.jse.2006.07.010.
43. Sperling J.W., Cofield R.H., Rowland C.M. Minimum fifteen-year follow-up of Neer hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty in patients aged fifty years or younger. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2004, 13:604-613. 10.1016/S1058274604001296.
44. Sperling J.W., Cofield R.H., Rowland C.M. Neer hemiarthroplasty and Neer total shoulder arthroplasty in patients fifty years old or less. Long-term results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998, 80:464-473.
45. Suero E.M., Citak M., Lo D., Krych A.J., Craig E.V., Pearle A.D. Use of a custom alignment guide to improve glenoid component position in total shoulder arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012, [Epub ahead of press]. doi:10.1007/s00167-012-2177-1.
46. Torchia M.E., Cofield R.H., Settergren C.R. Total shoulder arthroplasty with the Neer prosthesis: long-term results. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1997, 6:495-505.
47. Vandenbussche E., Saffarini M., Hansen U., Taillieu F., Mutschler C., Augereau B., et al. Measurement of femoral head penetration in polyethylene using a 3-dimensional CT-scan technique. Acta Orthop 2010, 81:563-569. 10.3109/17453674.2010.519163.
48. Veldkamp W.J., Joemai R.M., van der Molen A.J., Geleijns J. Development and validation of segmentation and interpolation techniques in sinograms for metal artifact suppression in CT. Med Phys 2010, 37:620-628. 10.1118/1.3276777.
49. Verborgt O., De Smedt T., Vanhees M., Clockaerts S., Parizel P.M., Van Glabbeek F. Accuracy of placement of the glenoid component in reversed shoulder arthroplasty with and without navigation. JShoulder Elbow Surg 2011, 20:21-26. 10.1016/j.jse.2010.07.014.
50. Verburg J.M., Seco J. CT metal artifact reduction method correcting for beam hardening and missing projections. Phys Med Biol 2012, 57:2803-2818. 10.1088/0031-9155/57/9/2803.
51. von Eisenhart-Rothe R., Muller-Gerbl M., Wiedemann E., Englmeier K.H., Graichen H. Functional malcentering of the humeral head and asymmetric long-term stress on the glenoid: potential reasons for glenoid loosening in total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2008, 17:695-702. 10.1016/j.jse.2008.02.008.
52. Wirth M.A., Rockwood C.A. Complications of total shoulder-replacement arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1996, 78:603-616.
53. Yian E.H., Werner C.M., Nyffeler R.W., Pfirrmann C.W., Ramappa A., Sukthankar A., et al. Radiographic and computed tomography analysis of cemented pegged polyethylene glenoid components in total shoulder replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005, 87:1928-1936. 10.2106/JBJS.D.02675.
54. Youderian A.R., Napolitano L.A., Davidson I.U., Iannotti J.P. Management of glenoid bone loss with the use of a new augmented all-polyethylene glenoid component. Tech Shoulder Elbow Surg 2012, 13:163-169. 10.1097/BTE.0b013e318265354d.