Effect of a variable prosthetic neck-shaft angle and the surgical technique on replication of normal humeral anatomy

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery

Volumn 91, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 1932-1941

  Jeong, Jinyoung ^a   Bryan, Jason ^a   Iannotti, Joseph P ^a  

^a LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADJUSTABLE NECK SHAFT ANGLE PROSTHESIS; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FIXED NECK SHAFT ANGLE PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; HUMERUS HEAD; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; ORTHOPEDIC PROSTHESIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL ANATOMY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY; CADAVER; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMERUS; JOINT PROSTHESIS; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; SHOULDER;

ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT; CADAVER; FEMALE; HUMANS; HUMERUS; JOINT PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SHOULDER JOINT;

EID: 68349143243     PISSN: 00219355     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00729     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Delude JA, Bicknell RT, MacKenzie GA, Ferreira LM, Dunning CE, King GJ, Johnson JA, Drosdowech DS. An anthropometric study of the bilateral anatomy of the humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007;16:477-483
2. Iannotti JP, Gabriel JP, Schneck SL, Evans BG, Misra S. The normal glenohumeral relationships. An anatomical study of one hundred and forty shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;74:491-500.
3. Hertel R, Knothe U, Ballmer FT. Geometry of the proximal humerus and implications for prosthetic design. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002;11:331-338 (Pubitemid 36904226)
4. Roche C, Angibaud L, Flurin PH, Wright T, Fulkerson E, Zuckerman J. Anatomic validation of an "anatomic" shoulder system. Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 2006;63:93-97
5. Harryman DT, Sidles JA, Harris SL, Lippitt SB, Matsen FA 3rd. The effect of articular conformity and the size of the humeral head component on laxity and motion after glenohumeral arthroplasty. A study in cadavera. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77:555-563
6. Fischer LP, Carret JP, Gonon GP, Dimnet J. Étude cinématique des mouvements de l'articulation scapulo-humérale. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1977;63 Suppl 2:108-112
7. Nyffeler RW, Sheikh R, Jacob HA, Gerber C. Influence of humeral prosthesis height on biomechanics of glenohumeral abduction. An in vitro study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:575-580 (Pubitemid 38269030)
8. Williams GR Jr, Wong KL, Pepe MD, Tan V, Silverberg D, Ramsey ML, Karduna A, Iannotti JP. The effect of articular malposition after total shoulder arthroplasty on glenohumeral translation, range of motion, and subacromial impingement. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2001;10:399-409. (Pubitemid 33601585)
9. Flurin PH, Gregory T, Wright TW, Zuckerman JD, Guillo S, Angibaud L, Roche C. Correlation between anatomical reconstruction and clinical results of a shoulder arthroplasty. Read at the 75th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 2008 Mar 5-7; San Francisco, CA.
10. Pearl ML. Proximal humeral anatomy in shoulder arthroplasty: implications for prosthetic design and surgical technique. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005; 14(1 Suppl S):99S-104S.
11. Pearl ML, Kurutz S. Geometric analysis of commonly used prosthetic systems for proximal humeral replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81:660-671 (Pubitemid 29241151)
12. Pearl ML, Volk AG. Coronal plane geometry of the proximal humerus relevant to prosthetic arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1996;5:320-326
13. Wirth MA, Ondrla J, Southworth C, Kaar K, Anderson BC, Rockwood CA 3rd. Replicating proximal humeral articular geometry with a third-generation implant: a radiographic study in cadaveric shoulders. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007; 16(3 Suppl):S111-6. (Pubitemid 46687092)
14. Boileau P, Walch G. The three-dimensional geometry of the proximal humerus. Implications for surgical technique and prosthetic design. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997;79:857-865
15. Pearl ML, Kurutz S, Robertson DD, Yamaguchi K. Geometric analysis of selected press fit prosthetic systems for proximal humeral replacement. J Orthop Res. 2002;20:192-197 (Pubitemid 34218261)
16. Kwon YW, Powell KA, Yum JK, Brems JJ, Iannotti JP. Use of three-dimensional computed tomography for the analysis of the glenoid anatomy. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005;14:85-90. (Pubitemid 40250080)
17. Scalise JJ, Bryan J, Polster J, Brems JJ, Iannotti JP. Quantitative analysis of glenoid bone loss in osteoarthritis using three-dimensional computed tomography scans. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008;17:328-335
18. Scalise JJ, Codsi MJ, Bryan J, Iannotti JP. The three-dimensional glenoid vault model can estimate normal glenoid version in osteoarthritis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008;17:487-491
19. Codsi MJ, Bennetts C, Gordiev K, Boeck DM, Kwon Y, Brems J, Powell K, Iannotti JP. Normal glenoid vault anatomy and validation of a novel glenoid implant shape. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008;17:471-478
20. Robertson DD, Yuan J, Bigliani LU, Flatow EL, Yamaguchi K. Three-dimensional analysis of the proximal part of the humerus: relevance to arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:1594-1602 (Pubitemid 30846107)
21. Boileau P, Chuinard C, Le Huec JC, Walch G, Trojani C. Proximal humerus fracture sequelae: impact of a new radiographic classification on arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;442:121-130 (Pubitemid 44384173)