Academic capitalism in the Pasteur’s quadrant

Journal of Further and Higher Education

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 301-311

  Mendoza, Pilar ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Academic capitalism; Faculty; Marketisation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84884325382     PISSN: 0309877X     EISSN: 14699486     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03098770903026925     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Adams, J.D., Chiang, E.P., and Starkey, K., 2001. Industry-university cooperative research centers. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26: 73–86.
2. Agrawal, A., and Henderson, R., 2002. Putting patents in context: Exploring knowledge transfer from MIT. Management Science, 48 (1): 44–60.
3. Becher, T., 1989. Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines, Bristol, PA: Society for Research in Higher Education (SRHE) and Open University Press.
4. Boyer, E., 1990. Scholarship reconsidered, Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
5. Campbell, T., and Slaughter, S., 1999. Faculty and administrators’ attitudes toward potential conflicts of interest, commitment, and equity in university-industry relationships. Journal of Higher Education, 70 (3): 309–52.
6. Cohen, W.M., Florida, R., Randazzese, L.P., and Walsh, J., 1998. “ Industry and the academy: Uneasy partners in the cause of technological advance ”. In Challenges to research universities, Edited by: Noll, R., Vol. chapter 7, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
7. Debackere, K., and Veugelers, R., 2005. The role of academic technology transfer organizations in improving industry science links. Research Policy, 34: 321–42.
8. Geiger, R.L., 1986. To advance knowledge: The growth of research universities, 1900–1940, New York: Oxford University Press.
9. Geiger, R.L., 1993. Research and relevant knowledge: American research universities since World War II, New York: Oxford University Press.
10. Geiger, R.L., 2004. Knowledge and money: Research universities and the paradox of the marketplace, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
11. Gluck, M.E., 1987. “ University-industry relationships in biotechnology: Implications for society ”. Harvard Univ. Unpublished doctoral diss.
12. Gumport, P.J., 2005. “ Graduate education and research: Interdependence and strain ”. In American higher education in the twenty-first century: Social, political, and economic challenges, 2nd ed., Edited by: Altbach, P.G., Berdahl, R.O., and Gumport, P.J., 425–61. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
13. Hall, B., Link, A.N., and Scott, J.T., 2001. Barriers inhibiting industry from partnering with universities: Evidence from the advanced technology program. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26: 87–98.
14. Hum, D., 2000. Reflections on commercializing university research. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 30 (3): 113–26.
15. Isabelle, M., 2008. “ Proprietary vs. open-access dimension of knowledge ”. In Genesis of innovation: Systemic linkages between knowledge and market, Edited by: Laperche, B., and Uzunidis, D., 56–81. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
16. Kezar, A., 2004. Obtaining integrity? Reviewing and examining the charter between higher education and society. Review of Higher Education, 27 (4): 429–59.
17. Kezar, A.J., Chambers, T.C., Burkhardt, J.C., and Associates. 2005. Higher education for the public good: Emerging voices from a national movement, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
18. Kolb, D.A., 1981. “ Learning styles and disciplinary differences ”. In The modern American college, Edited by: Chickering, A., 235–55. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
19. Krimsky, S., 2003. Science in the private interest: Has the lure of profits corrupted biomedical research?, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
20. Kuh, G.D., and Whitt, E.J., 1986. “ The invisible tapestry: Culture in American colleges and universities ”. In ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, no. 1, Washington, DC: George Washington University.
21. Link, A.N., and Scott, J.T., 2005. Universities as partners in US research joint ventures. Research Policy, 34: 385–93.
22. Mendoza, P., 2007a. Academic capitalism and doctoral student socialization: A case study. Journal of Higher Education, 78 (1): 71–96.
23. Mendoza, P., 2007b. “ Educating for the public good through comprehensive federal research & development policies ”. In ASHE/Lumina Policy Briefs and Critical Essays no. 3, Ames: Iowa State University, Department of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies.
24. Mendoza, P., and Berger, J.B., 2005. Patenting productivity and intellectual property policies at Research I universities: An exploratory comparative study. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13 (5) http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v13n5/
25. Mendoza, P., and Berger, J.B., in press. Academic capitalism and academic culture: A case study. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 16 (23) http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v16n23/
26. Mendoza, P., Kuntz, A., and Berger, J.B., in press. The effects of market forces on faculty work in science and engineering. Journal of the Professoriate.
27. Merton, R.K., 1957. Social theory of science, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28. Mowery, D.C., 1998. The changing structure of the US national innovation system: Implications for international conflict and cooperation in R&D policy. Research Policy, 27: 639–54.
29. Newman, F., Couturier, L., and Scurry, J., 2004. The future of higher education: Rhetoric, reality, and the risks of the market, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
30. O’Meara, K., and Rice, R.E., 2005. Faculty priorities reconsidered: Rewarding multiple forms of scholarship, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
31. Owen-Smith, J., 2005. Trends and transitions in the institutional environment for public and private science. Higher Education, 49 (1/2): 91–117.
32. Owen-Smith, J., and Powell, W., 2001. To patent or not: Faculty decisions and institutional success at technology transfer. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26: 99–114.
33. Powell, W., and Owen-Smith, J., 2002. “ The new world of knowledge production in the life sciences ”. In The future of the city of intellect: The changing American university, Edited by: Brint, S., 107–30. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
34. Ramaley, J.A., 2005. “ Scholarship for the public good: Living in Pasteur’s quadrant ”. In Higher Education for the Public Good: Emerging Voices from a National Movement, Edited by: Kezar, A. J., Chambers, T.C., and Burkhardt, J.C., 166–82. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
35. Rice, R.E., and Sorcinelli, M., 2002. “ Can the tenure process be improved? ”. In The questions of tenure, Edited by: Chait, R., 101–24. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
36. Salminen-Karlsson, M., and Wallgren, L., 2008. The interaction of academic and industrial supervisors in graduate education: An investigation of industrial research schools. Higher Education, 56: 77–93.
37. Salter, A.J., and Martin, B.R., 2001. The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: A critical review. Research Policy, 30: 509–32.
38. Santoro, M.D., and Bierly, P.E., 2006. Facilitators of knowledge transfer in university-industry collaborations: A knowledge-based perspective. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 53 (4): 495
39. Schein, E.H., 1985. Organizational culture and leadership, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
40. Slaughter, S., Archerd, C.J., and Campbell, T.I.D., 2004. Boundaries and quandaries: How professors negotiate market relations. Review of Higher Education, 28 (1): 129–65.
41. Slaughter, S., Campbell, T., Hollernan, M., and Morgan, E., 2002. The ‘traffic’ in graduate students: Graduate students as tokens of exchange between academe and industry. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 27 (2): 282–313.
42. Slaughter, S., and Leslie, L., 1997. Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
43. Slaughter, S., and Rhoades, G., 2004. Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets, state, and higher education, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
44. Stephan, P., 2001. Educational implications of university-industry technology transfer. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26: 199–205.
45. Stephan, P., Gurmu, S., Sumell, A., and Black, G., 2007. Who’s patenting in the university? Evidence from the survey of earned doctorates. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 16 (2): 71–99.
46. Stokes, D., 1997. Pasteur’s quadrant: Baste science and technological innovation, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
47. Tierney, W.G., 1988. Organizational culture in higher education: Defining the essentials. Journal of Higher Education, 59 (1): 2–21.
48. Tierney, W.G., 2004. Academic freedom and tenure: Between fiction and reality. Journal of Higher Education, 75 (2): 161–77.
49. Tierney, W.G., 2006. Trust and the public good: Examining the cultural conditions of academic work, New York: Peter Lang.