Proprietary vs. open-access dimensions of knowledge

The Genesis of Innovation: Systemic Linkages Between Knowledge and the Market

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 56-85

  Isabelle, Marc ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DAUPHINE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84881837835     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (43)

1. Arrow, K. (1962), 'Economic welfare and allocation of resources for invention', in R. Nelson (ed.), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 609-25.
2. Blumenthal, D., S. Epstein and J. Maxwell (1986), 'Commercializing university research: lessons from the experience of the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation', New England Journal of Medicine, 314 (25), 1621-6.
3. Blumenthal, D., E. Campbell, M. Anderson, N. Causino and K. Seashore-Louis (1997), 'Withholding research results in academic life science: evidence from a national survey of faculty', Journal of the Academic Medical Association, 277 (15), 1224-8.
4. Brooks, H. (1994), 'The relationship between science and technology', Research Policy, 23, 477-86.
5. Bush, V. (1945), Science, the Endless Frontier. A Report to the President, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
6. Calvert, J. (2002), 'Making academic research useful. Scientists' responses to changing policy demands', paper presented to the NPRNet Conference 'Rethinking Science Policy', 21-23 March, SPRU.
7. Calvert, J. and B.R. Martin (2001), 'Changing conceptions of basic research?', background document for the OECD Workshop on Policy Relevance and Measurement of Basic Research, Oslo, 29-30 October.
8. Cohen, W., R. Florida and W.R. Goe (1994), 'University-industry research centers in the United States', Carnegie Mellon University report for the Ford Foundation.
9. Cohen, W., R. Florida, L. Randazzese and J. Walsh (1998), 'Industry and the academy: uneasy partners in the cause of technological advance', in R.G. Noll (ed.), Challenges to Research Universities, accessed at http://brookings.nap.edu/books/0815715099/html/index.html.
10. Dasgupta, P. and P.A. David (1994), 'Toward a new economics of science', Research Policy, 23, 487-521.
11. David, P.A. (2000), 'The political economy of science', in H. Lawton Smith (ed.), The Regulation of Science and Technology, London: Macmillan.
12. David, P.A. (2003), 'The economic logic of "Open science" and the balance between private property rights and the public domain in scientific data and information: a primer', SIEPR discussion paper no. 02-30.
13. Florida, R. (1999), 'The role of the university: leveraging talent, not technology', Issues in Science and Technology (Summer), 363-73.
14. Florida, R. and W.M. Cohen (1999), 'Engine or infrastructure? The university role in economic development', in L.M. Branscomb, F.Kodama and R. Florida (eds), Industrializing Knowledge. University-Industry Linkages in Japan and the United States, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Geuna, A. (2001), 'The changing rationale for European university research funding: are there negative unintended consequences?', Journal of Economic Issues, 35 (3), 607-32.
16. Gibbons, M. (1999), 'Science's new social contract with society', Nature, 402, 81-4.
17. Goddard, J.G. and M. Isabelle (2006a), 'How do public laboratories collaborate with industry? New survey evidence from France', IMRI working paper no. 06/02, June.
18. Goddard, J.G. and M. Isabelle (2006b), 'Managing intellectual assets within knowledge-based partnerships: insights from a survey of public laboratories collaborating with industry', IMRI working paper no. 06/03, July.
19. Godin, B. (1996), 'Research and the practice of publication in industries', Research Policy, 25, 587-606.
20. Heller, M. and R. Eisenberg (1998), 'Can patents deter innovation? The anticommons in biomedical research', Science, 280, 698-701.
21. Henderson, R., A.B. Jaffe and M. Trajtenberg (1998), 'Universities as a source of commercial technology: a detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965-1988', Review of Economics and Statistics, 80, 119-27.
22. Hicks, D. and K. Hamilton (1999), 'Does university-industry collaboration adversely affect university research?', Issues in Science and Technology, 15 (4), 74-5.
23. Larsen, M.T. (2005), 'Does industrial relevance in public science come at the expense of basic research?', paper presented at the DRUID Winter Conference, Aalborg/Rebild Bakker, 27-29 January.
24. Merton, R.K. (1973), The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
25. Mowery, D.C., R.R. Nelson, B.N. Sampat and A.A. Ziedonis (2001), 'The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980', Research Policy, 30, 99-119.
26. Murray, F. and S. Stern (2006), 'Do formal intellectual property rights hinder the free flow of scientific knowledge? An empirical test of the anti-commons hypothesis', paper presented at the Druid Summer Conference, Copenhagen, 18-20 June.
27. Narin, F., G. Pinski and H.H. Gee (1976), 'Structure of the biomedical literature', Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 27, 25-45.
28. Nelson, R.R. (1959), 'The simple economics of basic scientific research', Journal of Political Economy, 67 (3), 297-306.
29. Nelson, R.R. (2000), 'Knowledge and innovation systems', in OECD (ed.), Knowledge Management in the Learning Society, Paris: OECD.
30. Nelson, R.R. (2004), 'The market economy and the scientific commons', Research Policy, 33, 455-71.
31. OECD (1994), Main Definitions and Conventions for the Measurement of Research and Experimental Development (R&D). A Summary of the Frascati Manual, Paris: OECD.
32. OECD (1996), The Knowledge-based Economy, Paris: OECD.
33. OST (2003), Rapport sur les indicateurs relatifs à la propriété intellectuelle dans les organismes de recherche publique et dans les établissements d'enseignement supérieur, Paris: OST.
34. Pavitt, K. (2001), 'Public policies to support basic research: what can the rest of the world learn from US theory and practice? (and what they should not learn)', Industrial and Corporate Change, 10 (3), 761-79.
35. Polanyi, M. (1962), 'The republic of science: its political and economic theory', Minerva, 1 (1), 54-73.
36. Ranga, L.M., K. Debackere and N. von Tunzelmann (2003), 'Entrepreneurial universities and the dynamics of academic knowledge production: a case study of basic vs. applied research in Belgium', Scientometrics, 58 (2), 301-20.
37. Scotchmer, S. (1991), 'Standing on the shoulders of giants: cumulative research and the patent law', Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 29-41.
38. Shapiro, C. (2001), 'Navigating the patent thicket: cross licenses, patent pools, and standard-setting', in A. Jaffe, J. Lerner and S. Stern (eds), Innovation Policy and the Economy, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39. Stokes, D.E. (1997), Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
40. Van Looy, B., M. Ranga, J. Callaert, K. Debackere and E. Zimmermann (2004), 'Combining entrepreneurial and scientific performance in academia: towards a compounded and reciprocal Matthew-effect?', Research Policy, 33, 425-41.
41. Walsh, J.P. and W. Hong (2003), 'Secrecy is increasing in step with competition,' Nature, 422, 801-02.
42. Walsh, J.P., C. Cho and W.M. Cohen (2005), 'Patents, material transfers and access to research inputs in biomedical research', final report to the National Academy of Sciences' Committee on Intellectual Property Rights in Genomic and Protein-Related Inventions, September.
43. Ziman, J. (1994), Prometheus Bound: Science in a Dynamic Steady State, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.