Representation and learning in motor action - Bridges between experimental research and cognitive robotics

New Ideas in Psychology

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 258-269

  Schack, Thomas ^a   Ritter, Helge ^a  

^a BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cognitive robotics; Interaction; Learning; Long term memory; Manual action; Representation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84884168955     PISSN: 0732118X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2013.04.003     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Abernethy B., Sparrow W.A. The rise and fall of dominant paradigms in motor behavior research. Approaches to the study of motor control and learning 1992, 3-45. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam. J.J. Summers (Ed.).
2. Barreto G., Araujo A., Ritter H. Self-organizing feature maps for modeling and control of robotic manipulators. Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems 2003, 24:407-450.
3. Bernstein (Bernštejn) N.A. O postrojenii dviženij 1947, Medgiz, Moskva.
4. Neurocognition of dance 2010, Psychology Press, London. B. Bläsing, M. Puttke, T. Schack (Eds.).
5. Bläsing B., Schack T., Brugger P. The functional architecture of the human body: assessing body representation by sorting body parts and activities. Experimental Brain Research 2010, 203:119-129.
6. Bläsing B., Tenenbaum G., Schack T. The cognitive structure of movements in classical dance. Psychology of Sport and Exercise 2009, 10(1):350-360.
7. Braun S.M., Beurskens A.J.H.M., Schack T., Marcellis R.G., Oti K.C., Schols J.M., et al. Is it possible to use the SDA-M to investigate representations of motor actions in stroke patients?. Clinical Rehabilitation 2007, 21:822-832.
8. Braun S.M., Kleynen M., Schols J.M., Schack T., Beurskens A.J., Wade D.T. Using mental practice in stroke rehabilitation: a framework. Clinical Rehabilitation 2008, 7:579-591.
9. Frank C., Land W.M., Schack T. Mental representation and learning: the influence of practice on the development of mental representation structure in complex action. Psychology of Sport and Exercise 2013, 14:353-361.
10. Gibson J.J. The theory of affordances. Perceiving, acting, and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology 1977, 67-82. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. R. Shaw, J. Bransford (Eds.).
11. Gienger, M., Toussaint, M., Jetchev, N., Bendig, A., & Goerick, C. (2008). Optimization of fluent approach and grasp motions. 8th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots.
12. Güldenpenning I., Koester D., Kunde W., Weigelt M., Schack T. Motor expertise modulates the unconscious processing of human body postures. Experimental Brain Research 2011, 213(4):383-391.
13. Haggard P., Wolpert D.M. Disorders of body scheme. Higher-order motor disorders: From neuroanatomy and neurobiology to clinical neurology 2005, 261-272. Oxford University Press, Oxford. H.-J. Freund, M. Jeannerod, M. Hallett (Eds.).
14. Hoffmann J., Butz M.V., Herbort O., Kiesel A., Lenhard A. Spekulationen zur Struktur ideo-motorischer Beziehungen. Zeitschrift für Sportpsychologie 2007, 14:95-104.
15. Hommel B., Muesseler J., Aschersleben G., Prinz W. The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2001, 24(5):849-878.
16. Hughes C.M.L., Haddad J.M., Franz E.A., Zelaznik H.N., Ryu J.H. Physically coupling two objects in a bimanual task alters kinematics but not end-state comfort. Experimental Brain Research 2011, 211(2):219-229.
17. Hughes C.M.L., Reißig P., Seegelke C. Motor planning and execution in left and right-handed individuals during a bimanual grasping and placing task. Acta Psychologica 2011, 138:111-118.
18. James W. The principles of psychology 1890, Vol. 1. Holt, New York.
19. Krause A.F., Bläsing B., Dürr V., Schack T. Direct control of anactive tactile sensor using echo state networks. Human Centered Robot Systems. Cognition, Interaction, Technology 2009, 11-21. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg. H. Ritter, G. Sagerer, R. Dillmann, M. Buss (Eds.).
20. Krause A.F., Dürr V., Bläsing B., Schack T. Multiobjective optimization of echo state networks for multiple motor pattern learning. 18th IEEE workshop on nonlinear dynamics of electronic systems (NDES 2010) 2010, 190-193. R. Tetzlaff, W. Schwarz (Eds.).
21. Lessmann N., Kopp S., Wachsmuth I. Situated interaction with a virtual human - perception, action, and cognition. Situated communication 2006, 287-323. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin. G. Rickheit, I. Wachsmuth (Eds.).
22. Lotze R.H. Medizinische Psychologie oder Physiologie der Seele 1852, 287-325. Weidmann'sche Buchhandlung, Leipzig, Germany.
23. Maycock J., Dornbusch D., Elbrechter C., Haschke R., Schack T., Ritter H. Approaching manual intelligence. Künstliche Intelligenz 2010, http://www.springerlink.com/content/tgv61350px27q482, 10.1007/s13218-010-0064-9.
24. Mechsner F., Kerzel D., Knoblich G., Prinz W. Perceptual basis of bimanual coordination. Nature 2001, 414:69-72.
25. Perrig W.J., Hofer D. Sensory and conceptual representations in memory: motor images that cannot be imaged. Psychological Research 1989, 51:201-207.
26. Pezzulo G., Calvi G. Computational explorations of perceptual symbol system theory. New Ideas in Psychology 2011.
27. Rensch B. Handgebrauch und Verständigung bei Affen und Frühmenschen 1973, Huber, Bern.
28. Ritter H., Steil J.J., Noelker C., Roethling F., McGuire P. Neural architectures for robotic intelligence. Reviews in the Neurosciences 2003, 14(1-2):121-143.
29. Rosch E. Principles of categorization. Cognition and categorization 1978, 27-48. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. E. Rosch, B.B. Lloyd (Eds.).
30. Rosenbaum D.A. The Cinderella of psychology: the neglect of motor control in the science of mental life and behavior. American Psychology 2005, 60(4):308-317.
31. Rosenbaum D.A., Cohen R.G., Jax S.A., Van Der Wel R., Weiss D.J. The problem of serial order in behavior: Lashley's legacy. Human Movement Science 2007, 26:525-554.
32. Rosenbaum D.A., Meulenbroek R.G., Vaughan J., Jansen C. Posture-based motion planning: applications to grasping. Psychological Review 2001, 108(4):709-734.
33. Rosenbaum D.A., Marchak F., Barnes H.J., Vaughan J., Slotta J., Jorgensen M. Constraints for action selection: Overhand versus underhand grips. Attention and Performance XIII: Motor representation and control 1990, 321-342. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ. M. Jeannerod (Ed.).
34. Röthling, F., Haschke, R., Steil, J. J., & Ritter, H. (2007). Platform portable anthropomorphic brasping with the Bielefeld 20 DOF Shadow and 9 DOF TUM Hand. IEEE IROS Conference Proceedings, pp. 2951-2956.
35. Schack T. The cognitive architecture of complex movement. Special Issue Part II: the construction of action - new perspectives in movement science. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology 2004, 2(4):403-438.
36. Schack T. Knowledge and performance in action. Journal of Knowledge Management 2004, 8(4):38-53.
37. Schack T. Die kognitive Architektur menschlicher Bewegungen - Innovative Zugänge für Psychologie, Sportwissenschaft und Robotik. Reihe "Sportforum" 2010, Meyer & Meyer, Aachen.
38. Schack T. A method for measuring mental representation. Handbook of measurement in sport 2012, 203-214. Human Kinetics, Champaign, Illinois. G. Tenenbaum, B. Eklund (Eds.).
39. Schack T., Bar-Eli M. Psychological factors in technical preparation. Psychology of sport training 2007, 62-103. Meyer & Meyer Sport, Oxford. B. Blumenstein, R. Lidor, G. Tenenbaum (Eds.).
40. Schack T., Hackfort D. An action theory approach to applied sport psychology. Handbook of sport psychology 2007, 332-351. Wiley, NJ. 3rd ed. G. Tenenbaum, R.C. Eklund (Eds.).
41. Schack T., Mechsner F. Representation of motor skills in human long-term memory. Neuroscience Letters 2006, 391:77-81.
42. Schack T., Ritter H. The cognitive nature of action - functional links between cognitive psychology, movement science and robotics. Progress in brain research: Mind and motion - The bidirectional link between thought and action 2009, 231-252. Elsevier, Amsterdam. M. Raab, J. Johnson, H. Heukeren (Eds.).
43. Schack T., Tenenbaum G. The construction of action - new perspectives in science. Special Issue Part I: perceptual and cognitive control. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology 2004, 2(3):207-209.
44. Schack T., Tenenbaum G. The construction of action - new perspectives in science. Special Issue Part II: representation and planning. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology 2004, 2(4):343-345.
45. Schmidt R.A., Lee T.D. Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis 2005, Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL.
46. Steggemann Y., Weigelt M., Kopp S., Vogel L., Schack T. Representation and learning in interaction with virtual agents 2011, CITEC-Project, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
47. Steil, J., Roetling, F., Haschke, R., & Ritter, H. (2004). Situated robot learning for multi-modal instruction and imitation of grasping. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, Special Issue on " Robot Learning by Demonstration", 47, pp. 129-141.
48. Stöckel T., Hughes C., Schack T. Representation of grasp postures and anticipatory motor planning in children. Psychological Research 2012, 76(6):768-776.
49. Summers J.J. Has ecological psychology delivered what it promised?. Motor behavior and human skill - A multidisciplinary approach 1998, Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL. J.P. Piek (Ed.).
50. Tenenbaum G., Hatfield B., Eklund R.C., Land W.M., Calmeiro L., Razon S., et al. A conceptual framework for studying emotions-cognitions-performance linkage under conditions that vary in perceived pressure. Progress in brain research 2009, 159-178. Elsevier, Amsterdam. M. Raab, J. Johnson, H. Heukeren (Eds.).
51. Viviani P. Do units of motor action really exist?. Experimental Brain Research 1986, 15:201-215.
52. Velentzas K., Heinen T., Schack T. Routine integration strategies and their effects on volleyball serve performance and players' movement mental representation. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology 2011, 23(2):209-222.
53. Weigelt M., Kunde W., Prinz W. End-state comfort in bimanual object manipulation. Experimental Psychology 2006, 53(2):143-148.
54. Weigelt M., Rosenbaum D.A., Hülshorst S., Schack T. Moving and memorizing: motor planning modulates the recency effect in serial and free recall. Acta Psychologica 2009, 132:68-79.
55. Weigelt M., Schack T. The development of end-state comfort planning in preschool children. Experimental Psychology 2010, 6:1-7.
56. Woodworth R.S. The accuracy of voluntary movement. Psychological Review 1899, 3:1-119.