Computational explorations of perceptual symbol systems theory

New Ideas in Psychology

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 275-297

  Pezzulo, Giovanni ^a   Calvi, Gianguglielmo ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF COGNITIVE SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGIES   (Italy)

Author keywords

Anticipation; Embodiment; Perceptual symbol systems; Schemas; Simulation

Indexed keywords

EID: 79956071520     PISSN: 0732118X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2009.07.004     Document Type: Article

References (90)

1. Arbib M.A. The metaphorical brain 2: Neural networks and beyond 1989, Wiley, New York.
2. Baddeley A.D. Working memory 1986, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
3. Barsalou L. Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology 2008, 59:617-645.
4. Barsalou L.W. Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1999, 22:577-600.
5. Barsalou L.W. Abstraction in perceptual symbol systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2003, 358(1435):1177-1187.
6. Barsalou L.W., Breazeal C., Smith L.B. Cognition as coordinated non-cognition. Cognitive Processing 2007, 8(2):79-91.
7. Barsalou L.W., Solomon K.O., Wu L.L. Perceptual simulation in conceptual tasks. The proceedings of the 4th conference of the International Cognitive Linguistics Association 1999, Vol. 3:209-228. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. M.K. Hiraga, C. Sinha, S. Wilcox (Eds.).
8. Beer R. The dynamics of adaptive behavior: a research program. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 1997, 20:257-289.
9. Bickhard M., Campbell R. Topologies of learning and development. New Ideas in Psychology 1996, 14:111-156. (46).
10. Bickhard M.H., Terveen L. Foundational issues in artificial intelligence and cognitive science: Impasse and solution 1995, Elsevier Scientific, Amsterdam.
11. Brooks R.A. Intelligence without representation. Artificial Intelligence 1991, 47(47):139-159.
12. Campbell D.T. Evolutionary epistemology. The philosophy of Karl Popper 1974, 413-462. Open Court, LaSalle, IL. P.A. Schillp (Ed.).
13. Clark A. Being there. Putting brain, body, and world together 1998, MIT Press.
14. Clark A. An embodied cognitive science?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1999, 3(9):345-351.
15. Cordeschi R. The discovery of the artificial: Behavior, mind and machines before and beyond cybernetics 2002, Kluwer Academic Pub.
16. Damasio A.R. Descartes' error: Emotion, reason and the human brain 1994, Grosset/Putnam, New York.
17. Demiris Y., Khadhouri B. Hierarchical attentive multiple models for execution and recognition (hammer). Robotics and Autonomous Systems Journal 2005, 54:361-369.
18. Dempster A.P., Laird N.M., Rubin D.B. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the em algorithm. Journal of Royal Statistical Society Series 1977, 39:1-38.
19. Dennett D. Why not the whole iguana?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1978, 1:103-104.
20. Dennett D. Cognitive wheels: the frame problem in artificial intelligence. Minds, machines, and evolution 1984, 128-151. Cambridge University Press. C. Hookway (Ed.).
21. Desmurget M., Grafton S. Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2000, 4:423-431.
22. Drescher G.L. Made-up minds: A constructivist approach to artificial intelligence 1991, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
23. Fahlman S.E., Lebiere C. The cascade-correlation learning architecture. Advances in neural information processing systems 1990, Vol. 2:524-532. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA.
24. Gallese V., Metzinger T. Motor ontology: the representational reality of goals, actions, and selves. Philosophical Psychology 2003, 13(3):365-388.
25. Glenberg A. What memory is for. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1997, 20:1-55.
26. Grush R. The emulation theory of representation: motor control, imagery, and perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2004, 27(3):377-396.
27. Harnad S. The symbol grounding problem. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 1990, 42:335-346.
28. Hebb D.O. The organisation of behaviour 1949, Wiley, New York.
29. Hesslow G. Conscious thought as simulation of behaviour and perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2002, 6:242-247.
30. Hoffmann H. Perception through visuomotor anticipation in a mobile robot. Neural Networks 2007, 20:22-33.
31. Hoffmann H., Moller R. Action selection and mental transformation based on a chain of forward models. From animals to animats 2004, Vol. 8:213-222. MIT Press, Los Angeles, CA. S. Schaal, A. Ijspeert, A. Billard, S. Vijayakumar, J. Hallam, J.-A. Meyer (Eds.).
32. Jacobs R., Jordan M., Nowlan S., Hinton G. Adaptive mixtures of local experts. Neural Computation 1991, 3:79-87.
33. Joyce D., Richards L., Cangelosi A., Coventry K. On the foundations of perceptual symbol systems: specifying embodied representations via connectionism. Proceedings of ICCM V 2003, 147-152. U. Bamberg (Ed.).
34. Kauffman S.A. The origins of order: Self-organization and selection in evolution 1993, Oxford University Press, New York.
35. Kawato M. Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 1999, 9:718-727.
36. Keijzer F. Representation and behavior 2001, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
37. Kelso J.A.S. Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior 1995, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
38. Kosko B. Neural networks and fuzzy systems 1992, Prentice Hall International, Singapore.
39. Lakoff G. Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind 1987, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
40. Lindblom J., Ziemke T. Social situatedness of natural and artificial intelligence: Vygotsky and beyond. Adaptive Behavior 2003, 11(2):79-96.
41. Mccauley L. Neural schemas: a mechanism for autonomous action selection and dynamic motivation. The 3rd WSES neural networks and applications conference 2002.
42. Maes P. Situated agents can have goals. Designing autonomous agents 1990, 49-70. MIT Press. P. Maes (Ed.).
43. von der Malsburg, C. (1981). The correlation theory of brain functions. Internal Report 81-2, Max-Planck-Institut Biophys. Chem., Gttingen FRG.
44. Mel B. MURPHY: A robot that learns by doing 1988, American Institute of Physics, New York, pp. 544-553.
45. Miall R., Weir D., Wolpert D., Stein J. Is the cerebellum a smith predictor?. Journal of Motor Behaviour 1993, 25(3):203-216.
46. Miall R.C. Connecting mirror neurons and forward models. Neuroreport 2003, 14(17):2135-2137.
47. Minsky M. The society of mind 1988, Simon & Schuster.
48. Morse A.F., Ziemke T. On the role(s) of modelling in cognitive science. Pragmatics and Cognition 2008, 16:37-56. (20).
49. Neisser U. Cognition and reality 1976, Freeman, San Francisco, CA.
50. Newell A., Simon H.A. Computer science as empirical enquiry: symbols and search. Communications of ACM 1976, 19(3):113-126.
51. Norman D.A., Shallice T. Attention to action: willed and automatic control of behaviour. Consciousness and self-regulation: Advances in research and theory 1986, Plenum Press. R.J. Davidson, G.E. Schwartz, D. Shapiro (Eds.).
52. O'Regan J., Noe A. A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2001, 24(5):883-917.
53. Pecher D., Zeelenberg R., Barsalou L.W. Sensorimotor simulations underlie conceptual representations: modality-specific effects of prior activation. Psychonomic Bulletin Review 2004, 11(1):164-167.
54. Pezzulo G. Coordinating with the future: the anticipatory nature of representation. Minds and Machines 2008, 18(2):179-225.
55. Pezzulo G. A study of off-line uses of anticipation. LNAI 2008, Vol. 5040:372-382. Springer. M. Asada, J. Tani, J. Hallam, J.-A. Meyer (Eds.).
56. Pezzulo G., Calvi G., et al. A schema based model of the praying mantis. From animals to animats 2006, Vol. 9:211-223. volume LNAI 4095, Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany. S. Nolfi, G. Baldassarre, R. Calabretta, J. Hallam, D. Marocco, O. Miglino (Eds.).
57. Pezzulo G., Calvi G. Designing modular architectures in the framework akira. Multiagent and Grid Systems 2007, 3(1):65-86.
58. Pezzulo G., Calvi G. Modulatory influence of motivations on a schema-based architecture: a simulative study. Proceedings of affective computing & intelligent interaction (ACII 07) 2007, 374-385. A. Paiva, R. Picard (Eds.).
59. Pezzulo G., Calvi G. Schema-based design and the akira schema language: an overview. LNAI 2007, Vol. 4520. Springer. M. Butz, O. Sigaud, G. Pezzulo, G. Baldassarre (Eds.).
60. Pezzulo G., Castelfranchi C. The symbol detachment problem. Cognitive Processing 2007, 8(2):115-131.
61. Pezzulo G., Castelfranchi C. Thinking as the Control of imagination: a conceptual framework for goal-directed systems. Psychological Research 2009, 73:559-577.
62. Pfeifer R., Scheier C. Understanding intelligence 1999, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
63. Piaget J. The construction of reality in the child 1954, Ballentine.
64. Piaget J. Equilibration of cognitive structures 1985, University of Chicago Press.
65. Popper K.R. Alles Leben ist Problemlösen 1996, Über Erkenntnis, Geschichte und Politik, R. Piper-Verlag, München.
66. Rizzolatti G., Craighero L. The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience 2004, 27:169-192.
67. Roy D. Semiotic schemas: a framework for grounding language in action and perception. Artificial Intelligence 2005, 167(1-2):170-205.
68. Rumelhart D.E., McClelland J.L., the PDP Research Group Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition 1986, Vols. 1 and 2. MIT Press, Cambridge.
69. Schank R.C., Abelson R.P. Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures 1977, L. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
70. Schöner G. Dynamical systems approaches to neural systems and behavior. International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences 2002, 10571-10575. Pergamon, Oxford. N.J. Smelser, P.B. Baltes (Eds.).
71. Shapiro D., Schmidt R. The schema theory: recent evidence & developmental implications. The development of movement control and co-ordination 1982, Wiley, New York. J.K.J. Clark (Ed.).
72. Simmons K., Barsalou L.W. The similarity-in-topography principle: reconciling theories of conceptual deficits. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2003, 20:451-486.
73. Simmons W., Martin A., Barsalou L. Pictures of appetizing foods activate gustatory cortices for taste and reward. Cerebral Cortex 2000, 15:1602-1608.
74. Singer W. Neuronal synchrony: a versatile code for the definition of relations?. Neuron 1999, 24:49-65.
75. Sloman A. The computer revolution in philosophy: Philosophy, science and models of mind 1978, Harvester Press (and Humanities Press), Hassocks, Sussex.
76. Solomon K.O., Barsalou L.W. Representing properties locally. Cognitive Psychology 2001, 43(2):129-169.
77. Solomon K.O., Barsalou L.W. Perceptual simulation in property verification. Memory & Cognition 2004, 32(2):244-259.
78. Steels L. Experiments on the emergence of human communication. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2006, 10(8):347-349.
79. Stojanov, G. (2001). Petitage: A case study in developmental robotics. In: Proc. 1st Int. Workshop on Epigenetic Robotics, Lund, Sweden.
80. Tani J., Ito M., Sugita Y. Self-organization of distributedly represented multiple behavior schemata in a mirror system: reviews of robot experiments using RNNPB. Neural Networks 2004, 17(8-9):1273-1289.
81. Tolman E. Purposive behavior in animals and men 1932, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.
82. Tyrrell, T. (1993). Computational mechanisms for action selection. PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh.
83. Weng J. Developmental robots: theory and experiments. International Journal of Humanoid Robotics 2003.
84. Wolfe J.M. Visual search. Attention 1996, University College London Press, London, UK. H. Pashler (Ed.).
85. Wolpert D.M., Ghahramani Z. Computational motor control. Science 2004, 269:1880-1882.
86. Wolpert D.M., Kawato M. Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control. Neural Networks 1998, 11(7-8):1317-1329.
87. Ziemke T. What's that thing called embodiment?. Proceedings of the 25th annual meeting of the cognitive science society 2003, Lawrence Erlbaum.
88. Ziemke T., Jirenhed D.-A., Hesslow G. Internal simulation of perception: a minimal neuro-robotic model. Neurocomputing 2005, 68:85-104.
89. Zlatev J. The epigenesis of meaning in human beings, and possibly in robots. Minds and Machines 2001, 11:155-195.
90. Zlatev J., Balkenius C. Introduction: why " epigenetic robotics" ?. Proceedings of the first international workshop on epigenetic robotics: Modeling cognitive development in robotic systems 2001, Vol. 85:1-4. Lund University Cognitive Studies.