Is it possible to use the Structural Dimension Analysis of Motor Memory (SDA-M) to investigate representations of motor actions in stroke patients?

Clinical Rehabilitation

Volumn 21, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 822-832

  Braun, Susy M ^a   Beurskens, Anna J ^a   Schack, Thomas ^b   Marcellis, Rik G ^c   Oti, Kenneth C ^c   Schols, Jos M ^c,d   Wade, Derick T ^c,e  

^a ZUYD UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Netherlands)

^b BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^d TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^e OXFORD CENTRE FOR ENABLEMENT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DATA ANALYSIS; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NURSING HOME; TASK PERFORMANCE;

AGED; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY DISORDERS; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REHABILITATION CENTERS; STROKE;

EID: 35148837793     PISSN: 02692155     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0269215507078303     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Braun SM, Beurskens AJ, Borm PJ, Schack T, Wade DT. The effects of mental practice in stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006; 87: 842-52.
2. Schack T, Tenenbaum G. Perceptual and cognitive control in action - a preface. New perspectives in movement science. Special issue part I: perceptual and cognitive control. Int J Sport Exerc Psychol 2004; 2: 207-209.
3. Schack T. the cognitive architecture of movement - New perspective in movement science. Special issue part II: representation and planning. Int J Sport Exerc Psychol 2004; 2: 403-38.
4. Decety J, Grezes J. Neural mechanisms subserving the perception of human actions. Trends Cogn Sci 1999; 3: 172-78.
5. Decety J, Jeannerod M, Durozard D, Baverel G. Central activation of autonomic effectors during mental simulation of motor actions in man. J Physiol 1993; 461: 549-63.
6. Decety J, Perani D, Jeannerod M et al. Mapping motor representations with positron emission tomography. Nature 1994; 371: 600-02.
7. Ingvar DH, Philipson L. Distribution of cerebral blood flow in the dominant hemisphere during motor ideation and motor performance. Ann Neurol 1977; 2: 230-37.
8. Mellit EPL. Reopening the mental imagery debate: lessons from functional anatomy. Neuroimage 1998; 8: 129-39.
9. Nair DG, Purcott KL, Fuchs A, Steinberg F, Kelso JA. Cortical and cerebellar activity of the human brain during imagined and executed unimanual and bimanual action sequences: a functional MRI study. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 2003; 15: 250-60.
10. Rizzolatti G, Fadiga L, Matelli M et al. Localization of grasp representations in humans by PET: 1. Observation versus execution. Exp Brain Res 1996; 111: 246-52.
11. Jeannerod M. Mental imagery in the motor cortex. Neuropsychologia 1995; 33: 1419-32.
12. Jeannerod M. Action from within. Special issue: New perspective in movement science, Part II: representation and planning. Int J Sport Exerc Psychol 2004; 2: 376-402.
13. Koch I, Keller P, Prinz W. The ideomotor approach to action control: implications for skilled performance. Special issue: New perspective in movement science, part II: representation and planning. Int J Sport Exerc Psychol 2004; 2: 362-75.
14. Schack T. On the structure of movement representations - Theoretical assumptions and methodical approach. Motor Control Learn 2001: 1-12. (E-journal: ISSN 1439-7919). Accessed 1 May 2004 from: http://journal.motorik.swi.uni-saarland.de/index.htm
15. Schack T, Mechsner F. Representation of motor skills in human long-term memory. Neurosci Lett 2006; 391: 77-81.
16. Schack T. The relationship between motor representation and biomechanical parameters in complex movements. Towards an integrative perspective of movement science. Eur J Sport Sci 2003; 3: 1-13.
17. Schols JM, Crebolder HF, van Weel C. Nursing home and nursing home physician: the Dutch experience. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2004; 5: 207-12.
18. Gould D. Greenleaf. Imagery training for peak performance. In Raalte van J, Brewer WB. eds. Exploring sport and exercise psychology, second edition. American Psychological Association, 2002: 49-74.
19. Malouin F, Richards CL, Doyon J, Desrosiers J, Belleville S. Training mobility tasks after stroke with combined mental and physical practice: a feasibility study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2004; 18: 66-75.
20. Martin K. Imagery use in sports: a literature review and applied model. Sports Psychol 1999; 13: 245-68.
21. Lander HJ, Lange K. Eine differentialpsychologische Analyse begrifflich-strukturiertes Wissens. Z Psychol 1992; 200: 181-97.
22. Decety J. The neurophysiological basis of motor imagery. Behav Brain Res 1996; 77: 45-52.
23. Jackson PL LM, Malouin F, Richards CL, Doyon J. Functional cerebral reorganization following motor sequence learning through mental practice with motor imagery. Neuroimage 2003; 20: 1171-80.
24. Jackson PL, Lafleur MF, Malouin F, Richards C, Doyon J. Potential role of mental practice using motor imagery in neurologic rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 82: 1133-41.