Representation of grasp postures and anticipatory motor planning in children

Psychological Research

Volumn 76, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 768-776

  Stöckel, Tino ^a   Hughes, Charmayne M L ^a   Schack, Thomas ^a  

^a BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867557511     PISSN: 03400727     EISSN: 14302772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-011-0387-7     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Adalbjornsson, C. F., Fischman, M. G., & Rudisill, M. E. (2008). The end-state comfort effect in young children. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 79, 36-41.
2. Blaesing, B., Schack, T., & Brugger, P. (2009). The functional architecture of the human body: Assessing body representation by sorting body parts and activities. Experimental Brain Research, 203, 119-129.
3. Braun, S. M., Beurskens, A. J. H. M., Schack, T., Marcellis, R. G., Oti, K. C., Schols, J. M., et al. (2007). Is it possible to use the SDA-M to investigate representations of motor actions in stroke patients? Clinical Rehabilitation, 21, 822-832.
4. Claxton, L. J., Keen, R., & McCarty, M. E. (2003). Evidence of motor planning in infant reaching behavior. Psychological Science, 14, 354-356.
5. Grafton, S. T., Fadiga, L., Arbib, M. A., & Rizzolatti, G. (1997). Premotor cortex activation during observation and naming of familiar tools. Neuroimage, 6, 231-236.
6. Grezes, J., & Decety, J. (2002). Does visual perception of object afford action? Evidence from a neuroimaging study. Neuropsychologia, 40, 212-222.
7. Herbort, O., & Butz, M. V. (2011). Habitual and goal-directed factors in (everyday) object handling. Experimental Brain Research, 213, 371-382.
8. Hughes, C. M. L., & Franz, E. A. (2008). Goal-related planning constraints in bimanual grasping and placing of objects. Experimental Brain Research, 188, 541-550.
9. Hughes, C. M. L., Haddad, J. M., Franz, E. A., Zelaznik, H. N., & Ryu, J. H. (2011a). Physically coupling two objects in a bimanual task alters kinematics but not end-state comfort. Experimental Brain Research, 211, 219-229.
10. Hughes, C. M. L., Reißig, P., & Seegelke, C. (2011b). Motor planning and execution in left and right-handed individuals during a bimanual grasping and placing task. Acta Psychologica, 138, 111-118. doi: 10. 1016/j. actpsy. 2011. 05. 013.
11. Johnson-Frey, S. H., McCarty, M., & Keen, R. (2004). Reaching beyond spatial perception: effects of intended future actions on visually-guided prehension. Visual Cognition, 11, 371-399.
12. Kuhtz-Buschbeck, J. P., Stolze, H., Jöhnk, K., Boczek-Funcke, A., & Illert, M. (1998). Development of prehension movements in children: A kinematic study. Experimental Brian Research, 122, 424-432.
13. Manoel, E. J., & Moreira, C. R. P. (2005). Planning manipulative hand movements: Do young children show the end-state comfort effect? Journal of Human Movement Studies, 49, 93-114.
14. Oldfield, R. C. (1971). Assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97-113.
15. Rand, W. M. (1971). Objective criteria for the evaluation of clustering methods. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 66, 846-580.
16. Rosenbaum, D. A., Marchak, F., Barnes, H. J., Vaughan, J., Slotta, J. D., & Jorgensen, M. J. (1990). Constraints for action selection: Overhand versus underhand grips. In M. Jeannerod (Ed.), Attention and Performance XIII (pp. 321-342). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
17. Rosenbaum, D. A., Meulenbroek, R. G. J., Vaughan, J., & Jansen, C. (2001). Posture-based motion planning: Applications to grasping. Psychological Review, 108, 709-734.
18. Schack, T. (in press). A method for measuring mental representation. handbook of measurement in sport. In G. Tenenbaum, R. C. Eklund, & A. Kamata (Eds.), Handbook of measurement in sport and exercise psychology. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
19. Schack, T., & Mechsner, F. (2006). Representation of motor skills in human long-term memory. Neuroscience Letters, 391, 77-81.
20. Schack, T., & Ritter, H. (2009). The cognitive nature of action-functional links between cognitive psychology, movement science and robotics. Progress in Brain Research, 174, 231-252.
21. Short, M. W., & Cauraugh, J. H. (1997). Planning macroscopic aspects of manual control: End-state comfort and point-of-change effects. Acta Psychologica, 96, 133-147.
22. Thibaut, J. P., & Toussaint, L. (2010). Developing motor planning over ages. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 105, 116-129.
23. Tucker, M., & Ellis, R. (1998). On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 830-846.
24. Von Hofsten, C. (1993). Prospective control: A basic aspect of action development. Human Development, 36, 253-270.
25. von Hofsten, C., & Ronnqvist, L. (1988). Preparation for grasping an object: A developmental study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 610-621.
26. Weigelt, M., Ahlmeyer, T., Lex, H., & Schack, T. (2011). The cognitive representation of a throwing technique in judo experts-Technological ways for individual skill diagnostics in high-performance sports. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 12, 231-235.
27. Weigelt, M., Kunde, W., & Prinz, W. (2006). End-state comfort in bimanual object manipulation. Experimental Psychology, 53, 143-148.
28. Weigelt, M., Rosenbaum, D. A., Hülshorst, S., & Schack, T. (2009). Moving and memorizing: Motor planning modulates the recency effect in serial and free recall. Acta Psychologica, 132, 68-79.
29. Weigelt, M., & Schack, T. (2010). The development of end-state comfort planning in preschool children. Experimental Psychology, 57, 476-482.