Revision of unicompartmental arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty: Not always a slam dunk!

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 28, Issue 8 SUPPL, 2013, Pages 128-132

  Sierra, Rafael J ^a   Kassel, Cale A ^a   Wetters, Nathan G ^b   Berend, Keith R ^c   Della Valle, Craig J ^b   Lombardi, Adolph V ^c  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^b RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c Joint Implant Surgeons   (United States)

Author keywords

Outcomes; Registry; Revision; TKA; UKA

Indexed keywords

POLYETHYLENE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; AVASCULAR NECROSIS; FEMALE; FEMORAL KNEE PROSTHESIS; FEMUR CONDYLE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMPLANT REGISTRY; JOINT STIFFNESS; KNEE ARTHRITIS; KNEE DISLOCATION; KNEE FRACTURE; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; KNEE SOCIETY SCORE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL DEVICE COMPLICATION; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; PATELLOFEMORAL JOINT; PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PROSTHESIS INFECTION; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; REOPERATION; RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS; TIBIAL KNEE PROSTHESIS; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT FAILURE; UNICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY;

OUTCOMES; REGISTRY; REVISION; TKA; UKA;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PROSTHESIS-RELATED INFECTIONS; REGISTRIES; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84884131345     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.02.040     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Riddle D.L., Jiranek W.A., McGlynn F.J. Yearly incidence of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in the United States. Arthroplasty 2008, 23(3):408.
2. Pandit H., Jenkins C., Gill H.S., et al. Minimally invasive Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee replacement: results of 1000 cases. J Bone Joint Surg 2011, 93B(2):198.
3. Price A.J., Svard U. A second decade lifetable survival analysis of the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011, 469(1):174.
4. Dalury D.F., Fisher D.A., Adams M.J., et al. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty compares favorably to total knee arthroplasty in the same patient. Orthopedics 2009, 32(4). [pii:orthosupersite.com/view.asp?rID=38057].
5. Chassin E.P., Mikosz R.P., Andriacchi T.P., et al. Functional analysis of cemented medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1996, 11(5):553.
6. Webster K.E., Wittwer J.E., Feller J.A. Quantitative gait analysis after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty 2003, 18(6):751.
7. Hassaballa M.A., Porteous A.J., Learmonth I.D. Functional outcomes after different types of knee arthroplasty: kneeling ability versus descending stairs. Med Sci Monit 2007, 13(2):CR77-CR81.
8. W-Dahl A., Robertsson O., Lidgren L., et al. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients aged less than 65. Acta Orthop 2010, 81(1):90.
9. Foran J.R., Brown N.M., Della Valle C.J., et al. Long-term survivorship and failure modes of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013, 471(1):102.
10. Furnes O., Espehaug B., Lie S.A., et al. Failure mechanisms after unicompartmental and tricompartmental primary knee replacement with cement. J Bone Joint Surg 2007, 89A(3):519.
11. Hamilton W.G., Collier M.B., Tarabee E., et al. Incidence and reasons for reoperation after minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2006, 21(6 Suppl 2):98.
12. Saldanha K.A. Revision of Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty-results of a multicentre study. Knee 2007, 14(4):275.
13. Lewold S., Robertsson O., Knutson K., et al. Revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: outcome in 1,135 cases from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty study. Acta Orthop Scand 1998, 69(5):469.
14. Hang Outcome of revision of unicompartmental knee replacement. Acta Orthop 2010, 81(1):95.
15. Pearse A.J., Hooper G.J., Rothwell A., et al. Survival and functional outcome after revision of a unicompartmental to a total knee replacement: the New Zealand National Joint Registry. J Bone Joint Surg 2010, 92B(4):508.
16. Dudley T.E., Gioe T.J., Sinner P., et al. Registry outcomes of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty revisions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008, 466(7):1666.
17. Labek Revision rates after total joint replacement: cumulative results from worldwide joint register datasets. J Bone Joint Surg 2011, 93B(3):293.
18. Chatain F. Revision total knee arthroplasty after unicompartmental femorotibial prosthesis: 54 cases. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 2004, 90(1):49.
19. Chou D.T. Revision of failed unicompartmental knee replacement to total knee replacement. Knee 2012, 19(4):356.
20. Järvenpää J., Kettunen J., Miettinen H., et al. The clinical outcome of revision knee replacement after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus primary total knee arthroplasty: 8-17years follow-up study of 49 patients. Int Orthop 2010, 34(5):649.
21. Johnson The survivorship and results of total knee replacements converted from unicompartmental knee replacements. Knee 2007, 14(2):154.
22. Wynn Jones H., Chan W., Harrison T., et al. Revision of medial Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement to a total knee replacement: similar to a primary?. Knee 2012, 19(4):339.
23. UK Joint Registry 9th Report of the National Joint Registry of England and Wales (surgical data for 2012) http://www.njrcentre.org.uk.
24. Miller M., Benjamin J.B., Marson B., et al. The effect of implant constraint on results of conversion of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2002, 25(12):1353.
25. Piedade S.R., Pinaroli A., Servien E., et al. Is previous knee arthroscopy related to worse results in primary total knee arthroplasty?. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2009, 17(4):328.