Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients aged less than 65: Combined data from the Australian and Swedish Knee Registries

Acta Orthopaedica

Volumn 81, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 90-94

  W Dahl, Annette ^a   Robertsson, Otto ^a   Lidgren, Lars ^a   Miller, Lisa ^b   Davidson, David ^c   Graves, Stephen ^c  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^c South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; HUMAN; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; REGISTER; REOPERATION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURVIVAL; SWEDEN; AGE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; KNEE PROSTHESIS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RISK FACTOR; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; AUSTRALIA; HUMANS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REGISTRIES; REOPERATION; RISK FACTORS; SWEDEN; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77950473777     PISSN: 17453674     EISSN: 17453682     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/17453671003587150     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Argenson J N, Parratte S. The unicompartmental knee: design and technical considerations in minimizing wear. Clin Orthop 2006; (452): 137-142
2. Berend K R, Lombardi Jr A V, Mallory T H, Adams J B, Groseth K L. Obes ity, young age, patellofemoral disease, and anterior knee pain: identifying the unicondylar arthroplasty patient in the United States. Orthopedics (5 Suppl) 2007; 30: 19-23.
3. Canadian Joint Replacement Register: http://secure.cihi.ca/.
4. Cartier P, Khefacha A, Sanouiller J L, Frederick K. Unicondylar knee arthroplasty in middle-aged patients: a minimum 5-year follow-up. Orthopedics (8 Suppl) 2007; 30: 62-65
5. Crowninshield R D, Rosenberg A G, Sporer S M. Changing demographics of patients with total joint replacement." Clin Orthop 2006; (443): 266-272
6. Deshmukh R V, Scott R D. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: long-term results. Clin Orthop 2001; (392): 272-278
7. Deshmukh R V, Scott R D. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for younger patients: an alternative view. Clin Orthop 2002; (404): 108-112
8. Emerson Jr R H, Higgins L L. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with the oxford prosthesis in patients with medial compartment arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2008; 90 (1): 118-122
9. Harrysson O L, Robertsson O, Nayfeh J F. Higher cumulative revision rate of knee arthroplasties in younger patients with osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop 2004; (421): 162-168
10. Kort N P, van Raay J J, Cheung J, Jolink C, Deutman R. The Oxford phase III unicompartmental knee replacement in patients less than 60 years of age. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2007; 15 (4): 356-360
11. Koskinen E, Paavolainen P, Eskelinen A, Pulkkinen P, Remes V. Unicondylar knee replacement for primary osteoarthritis: a prospective follow-up study of 1,819 patients from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2007; 78 (1): 128-135
12. Kozinn S C, Scott R. Unicondylar knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1998; 71 (1): 145-150
13. Lisowski L A, Verheijen P M, Lisowski A E. Oxford Phase 3 Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA): Clinical and radiological results of minimum follow-up of 2 years. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil 2004; 6 (6): 773-776
14. Mullaji A B, Sharma A, Marawar S. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: functional recovery and radiographic results with a minimally invasive technique. J Arthroplasty (Suppl 1) 2007; 22 (4): 7-11.
15. National Joint Registry for England and Wales (2008). 5th Annual report. http://www.njrcentre.org.uk.
16. Pennington D W, Swienckowski J J, Lutes, W B, Drake G N. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients sixty years of age or younger. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2003; 85 (10): 1968-1973
17. Price A J, Dodd C A, Svard U G, Murray D W. Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients younger and older than 60 years of age. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2005a; 87 (11): 1488-1492
18. Price A J, Short A, Kellett C, Beard D, Gill H, Pandit H, Dodd C A, Murray D W. Ten-year in vivo wear measurement of a fully congruent mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2005b; 87 (11): 1493-1497
19. Riddle D L, Jiranek W A, McGlynn F J. Yearly Incidence of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty in the United States. J Arthroplasty 2008; 23 (3): 408-412
20. Robertsson O, Ranstam J. No bias of ignored bilaterality when analysing the revision risk of knee prostheses: Analysis of a population based sample of 44,590 patients with 55,298 knee prostheses from the national SwedishKnee Arthroplasty Register. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2003; 4: 1.
21. Robertsson O, Knutson K, Lewold S, Lidgren L. The routine of surgical management reduces failure after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2001; 83 (1): 45-49
22. The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register: http://www.haukeland.no/nrl/default. htm#Publications.