Configuration vs. adaptation for business process variant maintenance: An empirical study

Information Systems

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 108-133

  Döhring, Markus ^a   Reijers, Hajo A ^b   Smirnov, Sergey ^a  

^a SAP RESEARCH   (Germany)

^b EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Model maintainability; Process adaptation; Process configuration; Process modeling; Process variants; User experiment

Indexed keywords

PROCESS ADAPTATIONS; PROCESS CONFIGURATION; PROCESS MODELING; PROCESS VARIANTS; USER EXPERIMENTS;

MODULAR CONSTRUCTION;

MAINTENANCE;

EID: 84883804509     PISSN: 03064379     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.is.2013.06.002     Document Type: Article

References (110)

1. F. Schönthaler, G. Vossen, A. Oberweis, and T. Karle Business Processes for Business Communities - Modeling Languages, Methods, Tools 2012 Springer
2. C. Richardson, C. Moore, C. Le Clair, R. Vitti, The Forrester Wave: Business Process Management Suites, Q3 2010,Technical Report, Forrester, 2010.
3. M. Dalgarno, D. Beuche, Variant Management, in: 3rd British Computer Society Configuration Management Specialist Group Conference, 1, Oxford.
4. J. Becker, and P. Delfmann Reference Modeling - Efficient Information Systems Design Through Reuse of Information Models 2007 Physica-Verlag
5. R. Conradi, and B. Westfechtel Version models for software configuration management ACM Computing Surveys 30 1998 232 282
6. R. Dijkman, M. Dumas, B. van Dongen, R. Käärik, and J. Mendling Similarity of business process models metrics and evaluation Information Systems 36 2011 498 516
7. A. Hallerbach, T. Bauer, and M. Reichert Capturing variability in business process models the Provop approach Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution 22 2009 519 546
8. B. Weber, M. Reichert, and S. Rinderle-Ma Change patterns and change support features - enhancing flexibility in process-aware information systems Data and Knowledge Engineering 66 2008 438 466
9. M. Genero, E. Manso, A. Visaggio, G. Canfora, and M. Piattini Building measure-based prediction models for UML class diagram maintainability Empirical Software Engineering 12 2007 517 549
10. D. Fahland, J. Mendling, H.A. Reijers, B. Weber, M. Weidlich, S. Zugal, Declarative versus imperative process modeling languages: the issue of maintainability, in: Business Process Management (BPM'09) Workshops, Springer, Ulm, 2010, pp. 477-488.
11. E. Rolon, L. Sanchez-Gonzalez, F. Garcia, F. Ruiz, M. Piattini, D. Caivano, G. Visaggio, Prediction Models for BPMN Usability and Maintainability, in: IEEE Conference on Commerce and Enterprise Computing (CEC'09), IEEE, 2009, pp. 383-390.
12. L.C. Briand, C. Bunse, and J.W. Daly A controlled experiment for evaluating quality guidelines on the maintainability of object-oriented designs IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 27 2001 513 530
13. R. Harrison, S. Counsell, and R. Nithi Experimental assessment of the effect of inheritance on the maintainability of object-oriented systems Journal of Systems and Software 52 2000 137 179
14. M. Rosemann, and W.M.P. van der Aalst A configurable reference modelling language Information Systems 32 2007 1 23
15. F. Gottschalk, W.M.P. van der Aalst, M.H. Jansen-Vullers, and M. La Rosa Configurable Workflow Models International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems (IJCIS) 17 2008 177 221
16. R. Müller, U. Greiner, and E. Rahm AgentWork a workflow system supporting rule-based workflow adaptation Data and Knowledge Engineering 51 2004 223 256
17. A. Awad, S. Sakr, M. Kunze, M. Weske, Design by selection: a reuse-based approach for business process modeling, in: 30th International Conference on Conceptual Modeling (ER'11), Springer, Belgium, 2011, pp. 332-345.
18. A. Schnieders, F. Puhlmann, Variability mechanisms in e-business process families, in: 9th International Conference on Business Information Systems (BIS'06), vol. 85, GI e.V., Klagenfurt, 2006, pp. 583-601.
19. M. Weidmann, F. Kötter, M. Kintz, D. Schleicher, R. Mietzner, Adaptive Business Process Modeling in the Internet of Services (ABIS), in: Sixth International Conference on Internet and Web Applications and Services (ICIW), pp. 29-34.
20. A. Charfi, H. Müller, M. Mezini, Aspect-Oriented Business Process Modeling with AO4BPMN, in: ECMFA, Springer, Paris, 2010, pp. 48-61.
21. M. Döhring, B. Zimmermann, vBPMN: event-aware workflow variants by weaving BPMN2 and business rules, in: 16th International Conference on Exploring Modelling Methods for Systems Analysis and Design (EMMSAD'11), Springer, London, 2011, pp. 332-341.
22. S. Meerkamm, Staged configuration of multi-perspectives variants based on a generic data model, in: 2nd International Workshop on Reuse in Business Process Management (rBPM'11), Springer, 2011, pp. 326-337.
23. M. Rastrepkina, Managing variability in process models by structural decomposition, in: 2nd International Workshop on Business Process Modeling Notation (BPMN'10), Springer, Potsdam, 2010, pp. 106-113.
24. M. Döhring, Handling Variants and Adaptation along the Life Cycle of Event-Aware Workflows, Dissertation, University of Jena, 2013.
25. S. Smirnov, H.A. Reijers, M. Weske, and T. Nugteren Business process model abstraction a definition, catalog, and survey Distributed and Parallel Databases 30 2012 63 99
26. C. Li, M. Reichert, A. Wombacher, Discovering reference models by mining process variants using a heuristic approach, in: 7th International Conference on Business Process Management (BPM'09), Springer, Ulm, 2009, pp. 344-362.
27. W.M.P. van der Aalst, and T. Basten Inheritance of workflows an approach to tackling problems related to change Theoretical Computer Science 270 2002 125 203
28. H.A. Reijers, J. Mendling, and R. Dijkman Human and automatic modularizations of process models to enhance their comprehension Information Systems 36 2011 881 897
29. R. Langlois Modularity in technology and organization Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 49 2002 19 37
30. M. La Rosa, M. Dumas, A. Ter Hofstede, and J. Mendling Configurable multi-perspective business process models Information Systems 36 2011 313 340
31. B. Kiepuszewski, A.H.M. ter Hofstede, and W.M.P. van der Aalst Fundamentals of control flow in workflows Acta Informatica 39 2003 143 209
32. ISO/IEC 25010:2011 9126-1.2: Systems and Software Engineering - Systems and Software Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE) - System and Software Quality Models, Technical Report, 2011.
33. H.A. Reijers, and J. Mendling A study into the factors that influence the understandability of business process models IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics - Part A Systems and Humans 41 2011 449 462
34. J. Mendling, M. Strembeck, and J. Recker Factors of process model comprehension - findings from a series of experiments Decision Support Systems 53 2012 195 206
35. D. Fahland, D. Lübke, J. Mendling, H. Reijers, B. Weber, M. Weidlich, S. Zugal, Declarative versus imperative process modeling languages: the issue of understandability, in: 14th International Conference on Exploring Modelling Methods for Systems Analysis and Design (EMMSAD'11), Springer, Amsterdam, 2009, pp. 353-366.
36. M. Weidlich, S. Zugal, J. Pinggera, D. Fahland, B. Weber, H. Reijers, J. Mendling, The impact of sequential and circumstantial changes on process models, in: 1st International Workshop on Empirical Research in Process-Oriented Information Systems (ER-POIS'10), CEUR-WS, Hammamet, 2010, pp. 43-54.
37. D. Birkmeier, S. Kloeckner, S. Overhage, An Empirical Comparison of the Usability of BPMN and UML Activity Diagrams for Business Users, in: 18th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS'10), Pretoria.
38. J. Recker, A. Dreiling, Does it matter which process modelling language we teach or use? - an experimental study on understanding process modelling languages without formal education, in: 18th Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS'07), Toowomba, pp. 356-366.
39. A.H.M. ter Hofstede, W.M.P. van der Aalst, M. Adams, and N. Russell Modern Business Process Automation - YAWL and its Support Environment 2010 Springer
40. S. Meerkamm, Configuration of multi-perspectives variants, in: 1st International Workshop on Reuse in Business Process Management (rBPM'10), Springer, Hoboken, 2010, pp. 277-288.
41. J. Vanhatalo, H. Völzer, F. Leymann, Faster and more focused control-flow analysis for business process models through SESE decomposition, in: 5th International Conference Service-Oriented Computing (ICSOC'07), Springer, Vienna, 2007, pp. 43-55.
42. O. Kopp, D. Martin, D. Wutke, and F. Leymann The difference between graph-based and block-structured business process modelling languages Enterprise Modelling and Information Systems Architecture 4 2009 3 25
43. O. Kopp, H. Eberle, F. Leymann, T. Unger, The subprocess spectrum, in: Business Process and Service Science (BPSC'10), GI e.V., 2010, pp. 269-279.
44. N. Russell, A.H.M. ter Hofstede, and W.M.P. van der Aalst YAWL - yet another workflow language (revised version) Information Systems 30 2005 245 275
45. C.-A. Petri Kommunikation mit Automaten, Dissertation 1962 University of Darmstadt
46. M. Rosemann, J.C. Recker, and C. Flender Contextualization of business processes International Journal of Business Process Integration and Management 3 2008 47 60
47. M. La Rosa, W.M. van der Aalst, M. Dumas, and A.H.M. ter Hofstede Questionnaire-based variability modeling for system configuration Software and System Modeling 8 2008 251 274
48. M. Döhring, B. Zimmermann, E. Godehardt, Extended workflow flexibility using rule-based adaptation patterns with eventing semantics, in: Informatik2010 Service Science, GI e.V., Leipzig, 2010, pp. 216-226.
49. M. Döhring, B. Zimmermann, L. Karg, Flexible workflows at design and runtime using BPMN2 adaptation patterns, in: 14th International Conference on Business Information Systems (BIS'11), Springer, Poznan, 2011, pp. 25-36.
50. M. Döhring, S. Heublein, Anomalies in rule-adapted workflows - a taxonomy and solutions for vBPMN, in: 16th European Conference on Software Maintenance and Re-engineering (CSMR'12), IEEE, Szeged, 2012, pp. 117-126.
51. M. Döhring, A. Schulz, I. Galkin, Emulating runtime workflow adaptation and aspect weaving by recursive rule-based sub-process selection - a model transformation approach, in: 16th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC'12), IEEE, London, 2012, pp. 133-142.
52. OMG, Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) Version 2.0 - 2011-01-03, Technical Report January, Object Management Group, 2011.
53. S. Sadiq, W. Sadiq, M. Orlowska, in: 20th International Conference on Conceptual Modeling (ER'01).
54. A. Hallerbach, T. Bauer, M. Reichert, Configuration and management of process variants, International Handbook on Business Process Management 1 (2010) 237-255.
55. C. Li, M. Reichert, and A. Wombacher Mining business process variants challenges, scenarios, algorithms Data and Knowledge Engineering 70 2011 409 434
56. N. Russell, W.M.P. van der Aalst, A. ter Hofstede, Workflow Exception Patterns, in: 18th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE'06), Springer, Luxembourg, 2006, pp. 288-302.
57. A. Lanz, B. Weber, M. Reichert, Workflow time patterns for process-aware information systems, in: 11th International Workshop on Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling (BPMDS'10), Springer, Hammamet, 2010, pp. 94-107.
58. F. Gottschalk, T.A.C. Wagemakers, M.H. Jansen-Vullers, W.M.P.V.D. Aalst, M.L. Rosa, Configurable process models - experiences from a municipality case study, in: 21st International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE'09), June, Springer, 2009, pp. 486-500.
59. J. Mendling, H.A. Reijers, and W.M.P. van der Aalst Seven process modeling guidelines (7PMG) Information and Software Technology 52 2010 127 136
60. F. Gottschalk Configurable Process Models, Dissertation 2009 Technical University of Eindhoven
61. Protos User Manual, Technical Report, Pallas Athena, BV, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands, 2004.
62. A. Hallerbach Management von Prozessvarianten, Dissertation 2009 University of Ulm
63. C. Wohlin, R. Runeson, M. Halst, M. Ohlsson, B. Regnell, A. Wesslen, Experimentation in Software Engineering - An Introduction, Kluwer, 2000.
64. K. Figl, R. Laue, Cognitive complexity in business process modeling, in: 23rd International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE'11), Springer, London, 2011, pp. 452-466.
65. R - A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, Technical Report, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2012.
66. S. Siegel, and N. Castellan Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences 2nd edition 1998 McGraw Hill
67. H.J. Seltman, Experimental Design and Analysis, Technical Report, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, 2012.
68. S. Kuiper, and J. Sklar Practicing Statistics Guided Investigations for the Second Course 2012 Pearson
69. J. McDonald Handbook of Biological Statistics 2nd edition 2009 Sparky House Publishing
70. H. Levene, Robust tests for the equality of variance, in: Contributions to Probability and Statistics, Stanford University Press, 1960, pp. 278-292.
71. S. Lawner Weinberg, and S. Knapp Data Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences Using SPSS 2002 Cambridge University Press
72. Jennifer Larson-Hall, A Guide to Doing Statistics in Second Language Research Using SPSS, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2009.
73. E. Mooi, and M. Sarstedt A Concise Guide to Market Research The Process, Data, and Methods Using IBM SPSS Statistics 2011 Springer
74. H. Motulsky, Choosing a statistical test, in: Intuitive Biostatistics, Oxford University Press, 1995.
75. M. Weidlich, J. Mendling, and M. Weske Propagating changes between aligned process models The Journal of Systems and Software 85 2012 1885 1898
76. M.J. Adams, A.H.M. ter Hofstede, D. Edmond, W.M.P. van der Aalst, Worklets - a service-oriented implementation of dynamic flexibility in workflows, in: Cooperative Information Systems (CoopIS'06), Springer, Montpellier, 2006, pp. 291-308.
77. J. Mendling, H.A. Reijers, J. Cardoso, What makes process models understandable? in: 5th International Conference on Business Process Management (BPM'07), Springer, Brisbane, 2007, pp. 48-63.
78. D. van Greunen, A. van der Merwe, and P. Kotze Factors influencing BPM tools - the influence on user experience and user interfaces International Journal of Computing and ICT Research 4 2010 47 57
79. J. Becker, P. Delfmann, and R. Knackstedt Konstruktion von Referenzmodellierungssprachen- Ein Ordnungsrahmen zur Spezifikation von Adaptionsmechanismen für Informationsmodelle Wirtschaftsinformatik 46 2004 251 264
80. S. Matook, and M. Indulska Improving the quality of process reference models a quality function deployment-based approach Decision Support Systems 47 2009 60 71
81. C. Li, M. Reichert, and A. Wombacher Mining business process variants challenges, scenarios, algorithms Data and Knowledge Engineering 70 2011 404 434
82. H. Schonenberg, R. Mans, N. Russell, N. Mulyar, W.M.P. van der Aalst, Process flexibility: a survey of contemporary approaches, in: Advances in Enterprise Engineering I (CAiSE'08 Workshops), Springer, Montpellier, 2008, pp. 16-30.
83. T. Burkhart, P. Loos, Flexible business processes-evaluation of current approaches, in: Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik 2010, Göttingen, pp. 1217-1228.
84. F. Daoudi, and S. Nurcan A benchmarking framework for methods to design flexible business processes Software Process Improvement and Practice 12 2007 51 63
85. M. Kapuruge, J. Han, A. Colman, Support for business process flexibility in service compositions: an evaluative survey, in: 21st Australian Software Engineering Conference (ASWEC'10), 2010, pp. 97-106.
86. C. Ayora, V. Torres, V. Pelechano, Dealing with Variability in Business Process Models: An Evaluation Framework - ProS-TR-2011-11, Technical Report, Universidad Politecnica De Valencia, 2011.
87. S. Nurcan, A survey on the flexibility requirements related to business processes and modeling artifacts, in: 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'08), IEEE, 2008, p. 378.
88. C. Ayora, V. Torres, V. Pelechano, BP Variability Case Studies Development using Different Modeling Approaches - ProS-TR-2011-03, Technical Report February, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, 2011.
89. J. Recker, M. Rosemann, W.M.P. van der Aalst, On the user perception of configurable reference process models - initial insights, in: 16th Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS'05), Sydney.
90. V. Torres, S. Zugal, B. Weber, M. Reichert, C. Ayora, V. Pelechano, A qualitative comparison of approaches supporting business process variability, in: 3rd International Workshop on Reuse in Business Process Management (rBPM 2012), Springer, 2012.
91. I. Rychkova, G.I.L. Regev, and A. Wegmann Using declarative specifications in business process design Journal of Computer Science 5 2008 45 68
92. R. Lu, S. Sadiq, and G. Governatori On managing business processes variants Data and Knowledge Engineering 68 2009 642 664
93. B. Mutschler, B. Weber, M. Reichert, Workflow management versus case handling - results from a controlled experiment, in: 23rd Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC'08), ACM, Ceará, Brazil, 2008.
94. J. Cardoso, Business process quality metrics: log-based complexity of workflow patterns, in: On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems (OTM'07), Springer, 2007, pp. 427-434.
95. R. Laue, V. Gruhn, Complexity metrics for business process models, in: 9th International Conference on Business Information Systems (BIS'06), GI e.V., Klagenfurt, 2006, pp. 1-12.
96. H. Reijers, I. Vanderfeesten, and W.M.P. van der Aalst Cohesion and coupling metrics for workflow process design Computers in Industry 23 2008 420 437
97. I. Vanderfeesten, H.A. Reijers, and W.M.P. van der Aalst Evaluating workflow process designs using cohesion and coupling metrics Computers in Industry 59 2008 420 437
98. G. Canfora, M. Piattini, F. Ruiz, and C.A. Visaggio A family of experiments to validate metrics for software process models Journal of Systems and Software 77 2005 113 129
99. E. Rolón, J. Cardoso, F. García, F. Ruiz, M. Piattini, Analysis and validation of control-flow complexity measures with BPMN process models, in: 10th International Workshop on Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling (BPMDS'09), Springer, Amsterdam, 2009.
100. J. Mendling, H. Verbeek, B. van Dongen, W.M.P. van der Aalst, and G. Neumann Detection and prediction of errors in EPCs of the SAP reference model Data and Knowledge Engineering 64 2008 312 329
101. T.A. Curran, A. Ladd, and G. Keller SAP R/3 Business Blueprint Understanding the Business Process Reference Model 1997 Prentice-Hall
102. R. Laue, J. Mendling, The impact of structuredness on error probability of process models, in: 2nd International United Information Systems Conference (UNISCON'08), Springer, Klagenfurt, 2008, pp. 585-590.
103. R. Laue, V. Gruhn, Good and bad excuses for unstructured business process models, in: 12th European Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs (EuroPLoP '07), UVK - Universitaetsverlag Konstanz, Irsee, Germany, 2007, pp. 279-290.
104. A. Polyvyanyy, S. Smirnov, M. Weske, The triconnected abstraction of process models, in: 7th International Conference on Business Process Management (BPM'09), 26, HPI, Uni Potsdam, Springer, Ulm, 2009, pp. 229-244.
105. S. Yongchareon, C. Liu, X. Zhao, M. Kowalkiewicz, BPMN process views construction, in: 15th International Conference on Systems for Advanced Applications (DASFAA'10), Springer, 2010, pp. 550-564.
106. M. La Rosa, P. Wohed, J. Mendling, A.H.M. ter Hofstede, H.A. Reijers, and W.M.P. van der Aalst Managing process model complexity via abstract syntax modifications IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 7 2011 614 629
107. M. La Rosa, A.H.M. ter Hofstede, P. Wohed, H.A. Reijers, J. Mendling, and W.M.P. van der Aalst Managing process model complexity via concrete syntax modifications IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 7 2011 255 265
108. Z. Yan, R. Dijkman, and P. Grefen Business process model repositories - framework and survey Information and Software Technology 54 2012 380 395
109. B. Weber, M. Reichert, J. Mendling, and H.A. Reijers Refactoring large process model repositories Computers in Industry 62 2011 467 486
110. R. Dijkman, M. La Rosa, and H.A. Reijers Managing large collections of business process models - current techniques and challenges Computers in Industry 63 2012 91 97