On the user perception of configurable reference process models - initial insights

ACIS 2005 Proceedings - 16th Australasian Conference on Information Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages

  Recker, Jan ^a   Rosemann, Michael ^a   van der Aalst, Wil ^b  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

^b EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Configuration; Enterprise systems; Is development methods; Process modeling

Indexed keywords

ADOPTION MODEL; CONFIGURATION; CONFIGURATION PROCESS; EASE-OF-USE; EFFICIENCY GAIN; EMPIRICAL DATA; ENTERPRISE SYSTEM; IS DEVELOPMENT; LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS; PROCESS MODEL; PROCESS MODELING; REFERENCE MODELING; REFERENCE MODELS; USER PERCEPTIONS;

HARDWARE;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 84869125773     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Bancroft, N.H., Seip, H. and Sprengel, A. (1997) Implementing Sap R/3: How to Introduce a Large System into a Large Organization, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
2. Becker, J., Delfmann, P., Dreiling, A., Knackstedt, R. and Kuropka, D. (2004) Configurative Process Modeling - Outlining an Approach to increased Business Process Model Usability in M. Khosrow-Pour (ed.) Proceedings of the 14th Information Resources Management Association International Conference, IRM Press, New Orleans, pp. 615-619.
3. Bodart, F., Patel, A., Sim, M. and Weber, R. (2001) Should Optional Properties Be Used in Conceptual Modelling? A Theory and Three Empirical Tests, Information Systems Research, 12, 384-405.
4. Curran, T., Keller, G. and Ladd, A. (1997) SAP R/3 Business Blueprint: Understanding the Business Process Reference Model, Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River.
5. Dalal, N.P., Kamath, M., Kolarik, W.J. and Sivaraman, E. (2004) Toward an integrated framework for modeling enterprise processes, Communications of the ACM, 47, 83-87.
6. Davis, F.D. (1989) Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology, MIS Quarterly, 13, 319-340.
7. Dreiling, A., Chiang, M., Rosemann, M. and van der Aalst, W. (2005a) Towards an Understanding of Model-Driven Process Configuration and its Support at Large in N. C. Romano (ed.) Proceedings of the 2005 Americas Conference on Information Systems, Association for Information Systems, Omaha, Nebraska, pp. 2084-2092.
8. Dreiling, A., Rosemann, M. and van der Aalst, W. (2005b) From Conceptual Process Models to Running Workflows: A Holistic Approach for the Configuration of Enterprise Systems in Proceedings of the 2005 Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, Bangkok, Thailand, pp. 363-376.
9. Gulla, J.A. and Brasethvik, T. (2000) On the Challenges of Business Modeling in Large-Scale Reengineering Projects in P. P. Chen, D. W. Embley, J. Kouloumdjian, S. W. Liddle and J. F. Roddick (eds.) Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Requirements Engineering, IEEE, Schaumburg, pp. 17-26.
10. Hammer, M. and Champy, J. (1993) Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution, Harpercollins, New York.
11. Keller, G., Nüttgens, M. and Scheer, A.-W. (1992) Semantische Prozessmodellierung auf der Grundlage Ereignisgesteuerter Prozessketten (EPK), Working Paper, Institut für Wirtschaftsinformatik der Universität Saarbrücken, Saarbrücken.
12. Kesari, M., Chang, S. and Seddon, P.B. (2003) A Content-Analytic Study of the Advantages and Disadvantages of Process Modelling in J. Ang and S.-A. Knight (eds.) Proceedings of the 14th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, School of Management Information Systems, Perth.
13. Luftman, J.N., Lewis, P.R. and Oldach, S.H. (1993) Transforming the Enterprise: The Alignment of Business and Information Technology Strategies, IBM Systems Journal, 32, 198-221.
14. Markus, M.L., Petrie, D. and Axline, S. (2000) Bucking the Trends: What the Future May Hold for ERP Packages, Information Systems Frontiers, 2, 181-193.
15. Mendling, J., Recker, J., Rosemann, M. and van der Aalst, W. (2005) Towards the Interchange of Configurable EPCs: An XML-based Approach for Reference Model Configuration in U. Frank and J. Desel (eds.) Proceedings of the Enterprise Modeling and Information Systems Architectures 2005, German Informatics Society, Klagenfurt, pp. In Press.
16. Moody, D.L. (2001) Dealing with Complexity: A Practical Method for Representing Large Entity Relationship Models, PhD Thesis, Department Of Information Systems, University of Melbourne.
17. Recker, J., Rosemann, M., van der Aalst, W. and Mendling, J. (2005) On the Syntax of Reference Model Configuration. Transforming the C-EPC into Lawful EPC Models in E. Kindler and M. Nüttgens (eds.) Proceedings of the Workshop on Business Process Reference Models, Nancy, pp. 60-75.
18. Rosemann, M. and van der Aalst, W. (2005) A Configurable Reference Modelling Language, Information Systems, In Press.
19. Sabherwal, R. and Chan, Y.E. (2001) Alignment Between Business and IS Strategies: A Study of Prospectors, Analyzers, and Defenders, Information Systems Research, 12, 11-33.
20. Sarshar, K. and Loos, P. (2005) Comparing the Control-Flow of EPC and Petri Net from the End-User Perspective in W. van der Aalst, B. Benatallah, F. Casati and F. Curbera (eds.) Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Business Process Management, Springer, Nancy, France, pp. 434-439.
21. Scheer, A.-W. (1998) ARIS - Business Process Frameworks, Springer, Berlin et al.
22. Scott, J.E. and Vessey, I. (2002) Managing risks in enterprise systems implementations, Communications of the ACM, 45, 74-81.
23. Siau, K. and Rossi, M. (1998) Evaluation of Information Modeling Methods -- A Review in D. Dolk (ed.) Proceedings of the 31st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Computer Society Press, Big Island, pp. 314-322.
24. Soffer, P., Golany, B. and Dori, D. (2003) ERP modeling: a comprehensive approach, Information Systems, 28, 673-690.
25. Soh, C., Sia, S.K., Boh, W.F. and Tang, M. (2003) Misalignments in ERP Implementation: A Dialectic Perspective, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 16, 81-100.
26. Tichy, W. (1998) Should Computer Scientists Experiment More?, Computer, 31, 32-40.
27. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B. and Davis, F.D. (2003) User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View, MIS Quarterly, 27, 425-478.