A prospective cohort study evaluating a novel colonoscopy platform featuring full-spectrum endoscopy

Endoscopy

Volumn 45, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 697-702

  Gralnek, Ian Mark ^a   Segol, Ori ^b   Suissa, Alain ^a   Siersema, Peter D ^c   Carr Locke, David L ^d   Halpern, Zamir ^e   Santo, Erwin ^e   Domanov, Svetlana ^a  

^a TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

^b CARMEL MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

^c UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^d BETH ISRAEL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e TEL AVIV SOURASKY MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; COLORECTAL POLYP; ENDOSCOPY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FULL SPECTRUM ENDOSCOPY; HUMAN; INTUBATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

ADENOMA; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CECUM; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTUBATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPERATIVE TIME; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PILOT PROJECTS; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84883786732     PISSN: 0013726X     EISSN: 14388812     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1344395     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 1977-1981 (Pubitemid 24015040)
2. Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Bond JH et al. Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 162-168 (Pubitemid 30489212)
3. Lieberman DA, Rex DK, Winawer SJ et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology 2012; 143: 844-857
4. Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O'Brien MJ et al. Colonoscopy polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 687-696
5. Hixson LJ, Fennerty MB, Sampliner RE et al. Prospective blinded trial of the colonoscopic miss-rate of large colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 1991; 37: 125-127
6. Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT et al. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology 1997; 112: 24-28 (Pubitemid 27008981)
7. Pickhardt PJ, Nugent PA, Mysliwiec PA et al. Location of adenomas missed by optical colonoscopy. Ann Intern Med 2004; 141: 352-359
8. van Rijn JC, Reitsma JB, Stoker J et al. Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 343-350 (Pubitemid 43381678)
9. Heresbach D, Barrioz T, Lapalus MG et al. Miss rate for colorectal neoplastic polyps: a prospective multicenter study of back-to-back video colonoscopies. Endoscopy 2008; 40: 284-290 (Pubitemid 351524375)
10. Leufkens AM, DeMarco DC, Rastogi A et al. Effect of retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy: the TERRACE study. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 480-489
11. Leufkens AM, van Oijen MGH, Siersema PD. Factors influencing the miss rate of polyps in a back-to-back colonoscopy study. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 470-475
12. Harrison M, Singh N, Rex DK. Impact of proximal colon retroflexion on adenoma miss rates. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99: 519-522 (Pubitemid 38524133)
13. Hewett DG, Rex DK. Miss rate of right-sided colon examination during colonoscopy defined by retroflexion: an observational study. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 246-252
14. Rex DK. Accessing proximal aspects of folds and flexures during colonoscopy: impact of a pediatric colonoscope with a short bending section. Am J Gastroenterol 2003; 98: 1504-1507 (Pubitemid 36875340)
15. Rex DK, Chadalawada V, Helper DJ.Wide angle colonoscopy with a prototype instrument: impact on miss rates and efficiency as determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Am J Gastroenterol 2003; 98: 2000-2005 (Pubitemid 37185796)
16. Deenadayalu VP, Chadalawada V, Rex DK. 170 degrees wide-angle colonoscope: effect on efficiency and miss rates. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99: 2138-2142 (Pubitemid 39524703)
17. Sanchez-Yague A, Kaltenbach T, Yamamoto H et al. The endoscopic cap that can (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76: 169-178
18. Triadafilopoulos G, Watts HD, Van Dam J et al. A novel retrograde-viewing auxiliary imaging device (Third Eye Retroscope) improves the detection of simulated polyps in anatomic models of the colon. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 65: 139-144 (Pubitemid 44932165)
19. Triadafilopoulos G, Li J. A pilot study to assess the safety and efficacy of the Third Eye retrograde auxiliary imaging systemduring colonoscopy. Endoscopy 2008; 40: 478-482 (Pubitemid 351911836)
20. DeMarco DC, Odstrcil E, Lara LF et al. Impact of experiencewith a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rates and withdrawal times during colonoscopy: the Third Eye Retroscope study group. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 542-550
21. Waye JD, Heigh RI, Rex DK et al. A retrograde-viewing device improves detection of adenomas in the colon: a prospective efficacy evaluation. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 551-556
22. Gralnek IM, Carr-Locke DL, Segol O et al. Comparison of standard forward viewing mode versus ultra-wide viewing mode of a novel colonoscopy platform: a prospective, multicenter study in the detection of simulated polyps in an in vitro colon model. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77: 472-479
23. Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Doughty AS et al. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 2533-2541 (Pubitemid 44917501)