aug-MIA-QSPR study of guanidine derivative sweeteners

European Food Research and Technology

Volumn 237, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 565-570

  Nunes, Cleiton A ^a   Freitas, Matheus P ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF LAVRAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

aug MIA QSPR; Chemometrics; Guanidine derivatives; Sweeteners

Indexed keywords

AUG-MIA-QSPR; BIOLOGICAL PROPERTIES; CHEMOMETRICS; GUANIDINE DERIVATIVE; MULTIVARIATE IMAGE ANALYSIS; PREDICTIVE MODELING; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE PROPERTY RELATIONSHIPS; SWEETENERS;

SYNTHESIS (CHEMICAL);

FOOD ADDITIVES;

EID: 84883786507     PISSN: 14382377     EISSN: 14382385     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00217-013-2032-8     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Lindemann B (1996) Taste reception. Physiol Rev 76: 718-766.
2. Bachmanov AA, Tordoff MG, Beauchamp GK (2001) Sweetener preference of C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice. Chem Senses 26: 905-913.
3. Kitagawa M, Kusakabe Y, Mius H (2001) Molecular genetic identification of a candidate receptor gene for sweet taste. Biochem Biophys Res Comm 283: 236-242.
4. Max M, Shanker YG, Huang LQ, Rong M, Liu Z, Campagne F, Weinstein H, Damak S, Margolskee RF (2001) Tas1r3, encoding a new candidate taste receptor, is allelic to the sweet responsiveness locus Sac. Nat Genet 28: 58-63.
5. Montmayeur JP, Liberles SD, Matsunami H, Buck LB (2001) A candidate taste receptor gene near a sweet taste locus. Nat Neurosci 4: 492-498.
6. Sainz E, Korley JN, Battey JF (2001) Identification of a novel member of the T1R family of putative taste receptors. J Neurochem 77: 896-903.
7. Hough L, Khan R (1991) In: Mathlouthi M, Kanters JA, Birch GG (eds) Sweet taste chemoreception. Elsevier, London.
8. Drew MGB, Wilden GRH, Spillane WJ, Walsh RM, Ryder CA, Simmie JM (1998) Quantitative structure-activity relationship studies of sulfamates RNHSO3Na: distinction between sweet, sweet-bitter, and bitter molecules. J Agr Food Chem 46: 3016-3026.
9. Bassoli A, Drew MGB, Hattotuwagama CK, Merlini L, Morini G, Wilden GRH (2001) Quantitative structure-activity relationships of sweet isovanillyl derivatives. Quant Struct-Act Relat 20: 3-16.
10. Tarko L, Lupescu I, Constantinescu-Groposila D (2006) QSAR Studies on amino-succinamic acid derivatives sweeteners. Arkivoc 13: 22-40.
11. Polanski J (2006) In: Spillane WJ (ed) Optimising sweet taste in foods. CRC Press, Boca Raton.
12. Cramer RD, Patterson DE, Bunce JD (1988) Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA). 1. Effect of shape on binding of steroids to carrier proteins. J Am Chem Soc 110: 5959-5967.
13. Klebe G, Abraham U, Mietzner T (1994) Molecular similarity indices in a comparative analysis (CoMSIA) of drug molecules to correlate and predict their biological activity. J Med Chem 37: 4130-4146.
14. Barker JD, Hattotuwagama CK, Drew MGB (2002) Computational studies of sweet-tasting molecules. Pure Appl Chem 74: 1207-1217.
15. Freitas MP, Brown SD, Martins JA (2005) MIA-QSAR: a simple 2D image-based approach for quantitative structure-activity relationship analysis. J Mol Struct 738: 149-154.
16. Freitas MP (2006) MIA-QSAR modelling of anti-HIV-1 activities of some 2-amino-6-arylsulfonylbenzonitriles and their thio and sulfinyl congeners. Org Biomol Chem 4: 1154-1159.
17. Freitas MP (2007) Multivariate QSAR: from classical descriptors to new perspectives. Curr Comput Aided Drug Des 3: 235-239.
18. Pinheiro JR, Bitencourt M, Cunha EFF, Ramalho TC, Freitas MP (2008) Novel anti-HIV cyclotriazadisulfonamide derivatives as modeled by ligand- and receptor-based approaches. Bioorg Med Chem 16: 1683-1690.
19. Cormanich RA, Goodarzi M, Freitas MP (2009) Improvement of multivariate image analysis applied to quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) analysis by using wavelet-principal component analysis ranking variable selection and least-squares support vector machine regression: QSAR study of checkpoint kinase WEE1 inhibitors. Chem Biol Drug Des 73: 244-252.
20. Goodarzi M, Cunha EFF, Freitas MP, Ramalho TC (2010) QSAR and docking studies of novel antileishmanial diaryl sulfides and sulfonamides. Eur J Med Chem 45: 4879-4889.
21. Cormanich RA, Freitas MP, Rittner R (2011) 2D Chemical drawings correlate to bioactivities: MIA-QSAR modelling of antimalarial activities of 2, 5-diaminobenzophenone derivatives. J Braz Chem Soc 22: 637-642.
22. Deeb O, Cunha EFF, Cormanich RA, Ramalho TC, Freitas MP (2012) Computer-assisted assessment of potentially useful non-peptide HIV-1 protease inhibitors. Chemometr Intell Lab Syst 116: 123-127.
23. 13C chemical shifts in methoxyflavonol derivatives using MIA-QSPR. Spectrochim Acta 74: 563-568.
24. Goodarzi M, Freitas MP (2009) Prediction of electrophoretic enantioseparation of aromatic amino acids/esters through MIA-QSPR. Separ Purif Tech 68: 363-366.
25. Goodarzi M, Freitas MP (2008) Predicting boiling points of aliphatic alcohols through multivariate image analysis applied to quantitative structure-property relationships. J Phys Chem 112: 11263-11265.
26. Nunes CA, Freitas MP (2013) Introducing new dimensions in MIA-QSAR: a case for chemokine receptor inhibitors. Eur J Med Chem 62: 297-300.
27. Nunes CA, Freitas MP (2013) aug-MIA-QSPR on the modeling of sweetness values of disaccharide derivatives. LWT-Food Sci Technol 51: 405-408.
28. Kanters JA, Scherrenberg RL, Leaflang BR, Kroon J (1988) The crystal and molecular structure of an intensely sweet chlorodeoxysucrose; 4, 1′, 6′-trichloro-4, 1′, 6′-tri-deoxy-galacto-sucrose. Carbohydr Res 180: 175-182.
29. 2! J Mol Graph Model 20: 269-276.
30. Mitra I, Saha A, Roy K (2010) Exploring quantitative structure-activity relationship studies of antioxidant phenolic compounds obtained from traditional Chinese medicinal plants. Mol Simulat 36: 1067-1079.
31. Nunes CA, Freitas MP, Pinheiro ACM, Bastos SC (2012) Chemoface: a novel free user-friendly interface for Chemometrics. J Braz Chem Soc 23: 2003-2010.
32. Polanski J, Gieleciak R, Bak A (2004) Probability issues in molecular design: predictive and modeling ability in 3D-QSAR schemes. Comb Chem & HTS 7: 793-807.
33. Bajorath J (2002) Virtual screening in drug discovery: methods, expectations and reality. Curr Drug Discov 2: 24-28.
34. Polanski J (2009) Receptor dependent multidimensional QSAR for modeling drug- receptor interactions. Curr Med Chem 16: 3243-3257.
35. Cohn G (1914) Die Organischen Geschmackstoffe. F. Siemenroth, Berlin.
36. Kier L (1972) A molecular theory of sweet taste. J Pharm Sci 61: 1394-1397.