Aug-MIA-QSPR on the modeling of sweetness values of disaccharide derivatives

LWT

Volumn 51, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 405-408

  Nunes, Cleiton A ^a   Freitas, Matheus P ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF LAVRAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Aug MIA QSPR; Halogenated disaccharide derivatives; Prediction; Sweeteners

Indexed keywords

FOOD ADDITIVES;

ATOMIC SIZES; AUG-MULTIVARIATE IMAGE ANALYSE APPLIED TO QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-PROPERTY RELATIONSHIP; HALOGENATED DISACCHARIDE DERIVATIVE; MOLECULAR SHAPES; MULTIVARIATE IMAGE ANALYSIS; PROPERTY; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE PROPERTY RELATIONSHIPS; SWEETENER; TWO-DIMENSIONAL;

MULTIVARIANT ANALYSIS;

EID: 84872600326     PISSN: 00236438     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2012.11.019     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Barker J., Hattotuwagama C., Drew M. Computational studies of sweet-tasting molecules. Pure and Applied Chemistry 2002, 74:1207-1217.
2. Chen Y., Yang Z., Wen C., Chang Y., Wang B., Hsiao C., et al. Evaluation of the structure-activity relationship of flavonoids as antioxidants and toxicants of zebrafish larvae. Food Chemistry 2012, 134:717-724.
3. Cormanich R., Freitas M., Rittner R. 2D chemical drawings correlate to bioactivities: MIA-QSAR modelling of antimalarial activities of 2,5-diaminobenzophenone derivatives. Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society 2011, 22:637-642.
4. Cormanich R., Goodarzi M., Freitas M. Improvement of multivariate image analysis applied to quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) analysis by using wavelet-principal component analysis ranking variable selection and least-squares support vector machine regression: QSAR study of checkpoint kinase WEE1 inhibitors. Chemical Biology & Drug Design 2009, 73:244-252.
5. Cramer R., Patterson D., Bunce J. Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA). 1. Effect of shape on binding of steroids to carrier proteins. Journal of the American Chemical Society 1988, 110:5959-5967.
6. Deeb O., Cunha E., Cormanich R., Ramalho T., Freitas M. Computer-assisted assessment of potentially useful non-peptide HIV-1 protease inhibitors. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 2012, 116:123-127.
7. Freitas M. MIA-QSAR modelling of anti-HIV-1 activities of some 2-amino-6-arylsulfonylbenzonitriles and their thio and sulfinyl congeners. Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry 2006, 4:1154-1159.
8. Freitas M. Multivariate QSAR: from classical descriptors to new perspectives. Current Computer-aided Drug Design 2007, 3:235-239.
9. Freitas M., Brown S., Martins J. MIA-QSAR: a simple 2D image-based approach for quantitative structure-activity relationship analysis. Journal of Molecular Structure 2005, 738:149-154.
10. 2!. Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling 2002, 20:269-276.
11. Goodarzi M., Cunha E., Freitas M., Ramalho T. QSAR and docking studies of novel antileishmanial diaryl sulfides and sulfonamides. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2010, 45:4879-4889.
12. Goodarzi M., Freitas M. Predicting boiling points of aliphatic alcohols through multivariate image analysis applied to quantitative structure-property relationships. Journal of Physical Chemistry A 2008, 112:11263-11265.
13. Goodarzi M., Freitas M. Prediction of electrophoretic enantioseparation of aromatic amino acids/esters through MIA-QSPR. Separation and Purification Technology 2009, 68:363-366.
14. 13C chemical shifts in methoxyflavonol derivatives using MIA-QSPR. Spectrochimica Acta 2009, 74:563-568.
15. Grotz V., Munro I. An overview of the safety of sucralose. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 2009, 55:1-5.
16. Kanters J., Scherrenberg R., Leefzang B., Kroon J. The crystal and molecular structure of an intensely sweet chlorodeoxysucrose; 4,1',6'-trichloro-4,1',6'-trideox-galacto-sucrose. Carbohydrate Research 1988, 180:175-182.
17. Kennard R., Stone L. Computer aided design of experiments. Technometrics 1969, 11:137-148.
18. Kier L. A molecular theory of sweet taste. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 1972, 61:1394-1397.
19. Klebe G., Abraham U., Mietzner T. Molecular similarity indices in a comparative analysis (CoMSIA) of drug molecules to correlate and predict their biological activity. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 1994, 37:4130-4146.
20. m metrics for validation of QSPR models. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 2011, 107:194-205.
21. Pripp A., Ardo Y. Modelling relationship between angiotensin-(I)-converting enzyme inhibition and the bitter taste of peptides. Food Chemistry 2007, 102:880-888.
22. Roy P., Paul S., Mitra I., Roy K. On two novel parameters for validation of predictive QSAR models. Molecules 2009, 14:1660-1701.
23. Shallenberger R., Acree T. Molecular theory of sweet taste. Nature 1967, 216:480-482.
24. Silla J., Nunes C., Cormanich R., Guerreiro M., Ramalho T., Freitas M. MIA-QSPR and effect of variable selection on the modeling of kinetic parameters related to activities of modified peptides against dengue type 2. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 2011, 108:146-149.
25. Spillane W., Coyle C., Feeney B., Thompson E. Development of structure-taste relationships for thiazolyl-, benzothiazolyl-, and thiadiazolylsulfamates. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2009, 57:5486-5493.
26. Yang X., Chong Y., Yan A., Chen J. In-silico prediction of sweetness of sugars and sweeteners. Food Chemistry 2011, 128:653-658.