An adaptive Australian Sentence Test in Noise (AuSTIN)

Ear and Hearing

Volumn 34, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 592-600

  Dawson, Pam W ^a,b   Hersbach, Adam A ^b   Swanson, Brett A ^b  

^a University of Melbourne   (Australia)

^b Research and Technology Labs   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; AUSTRALIA; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; MIDDLE AGED; NOISE; PHONETICS; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REPRODUCIBILITY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SPEECH AUDIOMETRY; SPEECH PERCEPTION; STANDARDS; VERY ELDERLY; ARTICLE; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; IMPLANTATION; METHODOLOGY; STANDARD;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AUSTRALIA; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; HEARING LOSS; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; NOISE; PHONETICS; PSYCHOACOUSTICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPEECH PERCEPTION; SPEECH RECEPTION THRESHOLD TEST;

EID: 84883709815     PISSN: 01960202     EISSN: 15384667     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31828576fb     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bacon, S. P., Opie, J. M., Montoya, D. Y. (1998). The effects of hearing loss and noise masking on the masking release for speech in temporally complex backgrounds. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 41, 549-563. (Pubitemid 28299849)
2. Bench, J., Doyle, J., Greenwood, K. M. (1987). A standardisation of the BKB/A sentence test for children in comparison with the NAL-CID sentence test and CAL-PBM word test. Aust J Audiol, 9, 39-48.
3. Bench, J., Kowal, A., Bamford, J. (1979). The BKB (Bamford-Kowal-Bench) sentence lists for partially-hearing children. Br J Audiol, 13, 108-112. (Pubitemid 10224351)
4. Bentler, R. A. (2000). List equivalency and test-retest reliability of the Speech in Noise test. Am J Audiol, 9, 84-100. (Pubitemid 32098675)
5. Boothroyd, A. (1968). Developments in speech audiometry. Sound, 3, 3-10.
6. Boothroyd, A. H., & L. Hnath, T. (1985). A Sentence Test of Speech Perception: Reliability, Set Equivalence, and Short term Learning. Internal report, Speech & Hearing Sciences Research Center, City University of New York.
7. Brand, T., & Kollmeier, B. (2002). Efficient adaptive procedures for threshold and concurrent slope estimates for psychophysics and speech intelligibility tests. J Acoust Soc Am, 111, 2801-2810. (Pubitemid 34760267)
8. Byrne, D., Dillon, H., Tran, K., et al. (1994). An international comparison of long-term average speech spectra. J Acoust Soc Am, 96, 2108-2120. (Pubitemid 24311638)
9. Cameron, S., & Dillon, H. (2007a). Development of the Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences Test (LISN-S). Ear Hear, 28, 196-211. (Pubitemid 46673497)
10. Cameron, S., & Dillon, H. (2007b). The listening in spatialized noisesentences test (LISN-S): Test-retest reliability study. Int J Audiol, 46, 145-153. (Pubitemid 46439734)
11. Dawson, P. W., Decker, J. A., Psarros, C. E. (2004). Optimizing dynamic range in children using the nucleus cochlear implant. Ear Hear, 25, 230-241. (Pubitemid 38744508)
12. ® cochlear implant recipients. Ear Hear, 32, 382-390.
13. Etymotic, R. (2005). Bamford-Kowal-Bench Speech-in-Noise Test (Version 1.03) CD Manual. 1-27.
14. Hagerman, B. (1976). Reliability in the determination of speech discrimination. Scand Audiol, 5, 219-228. (Pubitemid 8004018)
15. Hällgren, M., Larsby, B., Arlinger, S. (2006). A Swedish version of the Hearing In Noise Test (HINT) for measurement of speech recognition. Int J Audiol, 45, 227-237.
16. James, C. J., Skinner, M. W., Martin, L. F., et al. (2003). An investigation of input level range for the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: Speech perception performance, program preference, and loudness comfort ratings. Ear Hear, 24, 157-174. (Pubitemid 36403010)
17. Killion, M. C., Niquette, P. A., Gudmundsen, G. I., et al. (2004). Development of a quick speech-in-noise test for measuring signal-to-noise ratio loss in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am, 116(4 Pt 1), 2395-2405. (Pubitemid 39391641)
18. Levitt, H. (1971). Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. J Acoust Soc Am, 49, (Suppl 2): 467.
19. Levitt, H. (1978). Adaptive testing in audiology. Scand Audiol Suppl, 241-291. (Pubitemid 8308614)
20. Li, N., & Loizou, P. C. (2008). A glimpsing account for the benefit of simulated combined acoustic and electric hearing. J Acoust Soc Am, 123, 2287-2294. (Pubitemid 351503002)
21. Mackie, K., & Dermody, P. (1986). Use of a monosyllabic adaptive speech test (MAST) with young children. J Speech Hear Res, 29, 275-281. (Pubitemid 16068590)
22. Nilsson, M., Soli, S. D., Sullivan, J. A. (1994). Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 95, 1085-1099. (Pubitemid 24056373)
23. Plomp, R., & Mimpen, A. M. (1979a). Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. Audiology, 18, 43-52. (Pubitemid 9111887)
24. Plomp, R., & Mimpen, A. M. (1979b). Speech-reception threshold for sentences as a function of age and noise level. J Acoust Soc Am, 66, 1333-1342.
25. Qin, M. K., & Oxenham, A. J. (2003). Effects of simulated cochlear-implant processing on speech reception in fluctuating maskers. J Acoust Soc Am, 114, 446-454. (Pubitemid 36835514)
26. Vaillancourt, V., Laroche, C., Mayer, C., et al. (2005). Adaptation of the HINT (hearing in noise test) for adult Canadian Francophone populations. Int J Audiol, 44, 358-369. (Pubitemid 41029499)
27. Vaillancourt, V., Laroche, C., Giguère, C., et al. (2008). Establishment of age-specific normative data for the Canadian French version of the hearing in noise test for children. Ear Hear, 29, 453-466. (Pubitemid 351652239)
28. van Wieringen, A., & Wouters, J. (2008). LIST and LINT: Sentences and numbers for quantifying speech understanding in severely impaired listeners for Flanders and the Netherlands. Int J Audiol, 47, 348-355. (Pubitemid 351998880)
29. Villchur, E. (1987). Multichannel compression processing for profound deafiness. J Rehabil Res Dev, 24, 135-148. (Pubitemid 18020086)
30. Wichmann, F. A., & Hill, N. J. (2001). The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit. Percept Psychophys, 63, 1293-1313. (Pubitemid 33610257)
31. Wong, L. L., & Soli, S. D. (2005). Development of the Cantonese Hearing In Noise Test (CHINT). Ear Hear, 26, 276-289. (Pubitemid 40917425)