LIST and LINT: Sentences and numbers for quantifying speech understanding in severely impaired listeners for Flanders and the Netherlands

International Journal of Audiology

Volumn 47, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 348-355

  Van Wieringen, Astrid ^a   Wouters, Jan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Numbers; Sentences; Speech intelligibility

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; NETHERLANDS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SPEECH AUDIOMETRY; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; SPEECH RATE;

ADULT; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; HEARING IMPAIRED PERSONS; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; NETHERLANDS; REFERENCE VALUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; SPEECH RECEPTION THRESHOLD TEST;

EID: 47349093943     PISSN: 14992027     EISSN: 17088186     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14992020801895144     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Boersma, P. 2001. Praat: a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International, 5, 9/10, 341-345.
2. Hällgren, M., Larsby, B. & Arlinger, S. 2006. A Swedish version of the hearing in noise test (HINT) for measurement of speech recognition. Int J Audiol, 45(4), 227-237.
3. Laneau, J., Boets, B., Moonen, M., Wieringen, A. van. & Wouters, J. 2005. A flexible auditory research platform using acoustic or electric stimuli for adults and young children. J Neurosc Meth, 142, 131-136.
4. Liu, S., Del Rio, E., Bradlow, A.R. & Zeng, F-G. 2004. Clear speech perception in acoustic and electric hearing. J Acoust Soc Am, 116(4), 2374-2383.
5. Kollmeier, B. & Wesselkamp, M. 1997. Development and evaluation of a German sentence test for objective and subjective speech intelligibility assessment. J Acoust Soc Am, 102, 2412-2421.
6. Miller, G.A., Heise, G.A. & Lichten,W. 1951. The intelligibility of speech as a function of the context of the test materials. J Exp Psych, 41, 329-340.
7. Nilsson, M, Soli, S.D. & Sullivan, J.A. 1994. Development of the hearing in noise test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 95, 1085-1099.
8. Plomp, R. & Mimpen, A.M 1979. Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. Audiology, 18, 43-52.
9. Ramkissoon, I., Proctor, A., Lansing, C.R. & Bilger, R.C. 2002. Digit speech recognition thresholds (SRT) for non-native speakers of English. Am J Audiol, 11, 23-28.
10. Smits, C., Kapteyn, Th.S. & Houtgast, T. 2004. Development and validation of an automatic speech-in-noise screening test by telephone. Int J Audiol, 43, 15-28.
11. SPSS 12.0, 2004. SPSS Inc, Chicago, USA.
12. Vaillancourt, V., Laroche, C., Mayer, C., Basque, C., Nali, M., et al. 2005. Adaptation of the HINT (hearing in noise test) for adult Canadian Francophone populations. Int J Audiol, 44, 358-369.
13. Van den Broecke, M. 1988. Frequenties van letters, lettergrepen, woorden en fonemen in het Nederlands. In M.P.R. van den Broecke (ed.), Ter Sprake: spraak als betekenisvol geluid in 36 thematische hoofdstukken. Fortis Publications.
14. Van Wieringen, A. & Wouters, J. 2005. LIST en LINT, Nederlandstalige spraakaudiometrielijsten met zinnen en getallen, realisatie Lab.Exp. ORL-NKO, K.U. Leuven, CD SIG0501/2.
15. Versfeld, N.J., Daalder, L., Festen, J.M. & Houtgast, T. 2000. Method for the selection of sentence materials for efficient measurement of the speech reception threshold. J Acoust Soc Am, 107, 1671-1684.