Development of the Cantonese Hearing In Noise Test (CHINT)

Ear and Hearing

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 276-289

  Wong, Lena L N ^a,c   Soli, Sigfrid D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b HOUSE EAR INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CANTONESE HEARING IN NOISE TEST; CHINESE; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; ENGLISH HEARING IN NOISE TEST; EVALUATION; HEARING TEST; HISTOGRAM; HONG KONG; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PHONEME; PILOT STUDY; RELIABILITY; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AUDIOMETRY, SPEECH; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MALE; NOISE; PHONETICS; PILOT PROJECTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOFTWARE; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TAPE RECORDING;

EID: 21444443949     PISSN: 01960202     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00003446-200506000-00004     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bauer, R. S., & Benedict, P. K. (1997). Modern Cantonese Phonology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
2. Boothroyd, & Nittrouer, S. (1988). Mathematical treatment of context effects in phoneme and word recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 84(1), 101-114.
3. Broonkhorst, A. W., Bosman, A. J., & Smoorenburg, G. G. (1993). A model for context effects in speech recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 93(1), 499-509.
4. Byrne, D., Dillon, H., Tran, K., Arlinger, S., Wibraham, K., Cox, R., et al. (1994). An international comparison of long-term average speech spectra. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 96(4), 2108-2120.
5. Chao, Y. R. (1947). Cantonese Primer. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
6. Ciocca, V., Francis, A. L., & Aisha, R., & Wong, L. L. N. (2002). The perception of Cantonese lexical tones by early-deafened cochlear implantees. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 111(5), 2250-2256.
7. Dodd, B. J., & So, L. K. (1994). The phonological abilities: of Cantonese-speaking children with hearing loss. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 37(3), 671-679.
8. Doyle, J., & Wong, L. N. (1996). The mismatch between aspects of hearing impairment and hearing disability/handicap in adult/ elderly Cantonese speakers: Some hypotheses concerning cultural and linguistic influences. Journal of American Academy of Audiology, 7(6), 442-446.
9. Eisenberg, L. S., Dirks, D. D., Takayanagi, S., and Martinez, A. S. (1998). Subjective judgments of clarity and intelligibility for filtered stimuli with equivalent speech intelligibility index predictions. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 327-339.
10. Fok Chan, Y. Y. (1974). A Perceptual Study of Tones in Cantonese. Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong.
11. Hagerman, D. (1982). Sentences for testing speech intelligibility in noise. Scandinavian Audiology, 11, 79-87.
12. Hagerman, D. (1984). Clinical measurements of speech reception thresholds in noise. Scandinavian Audiology, 13, 57-63.
13. Hirsh, I. J., Davis H., Richard Silverman, S., Reynolds, E. G., Eldert, E., & Benson, R. W. (1952). Development of materials for speech audiometry. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 17(3), 321-337.
14. Kei, J., Chan, T., Ma, M. C., Ng, L., Lowe, C., Lai, D. M., et al. (1991). Cantonese speech audiometry for children of Hong Kong. Australian Journal of Audiology, 13(2), 41-45.
15. Lau, C. C., & So, K. W. (1988). Material for Cantonese speech audiometry constructed by appropriate phonetic principles. British Journal of Audiology, 22, 297-304.
16. Laurence, R. B., Moore, B. C. J., & Glasberg, B. R. (1983). A comparison of behind-the-ear high-fidelity linear hearing aids and two-channel compression aids in the laboratory and in everyday life. British Journal of Audiology, 17, 31-48.
17. Leung, M. T., Law, S. P., & Fung, R. (2004). Type and token frequencies of phonological units in Hong Kong Cantonese. Journal Behavior, Research Methods, Instruments, and Computer, 36(3), 500-505.
18. Matthews, S., & Yip, V. (1994). Cantonese: A Comprehensive Grammar. London: Routledge.
19. Nilsson, M., Soli, S. D., & Sullivan, J. A. (1994). Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 95(2), 1085-1099.
20. Plomp, R., & Mimpen, A. M. (1979). Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. Audiology, 18, 43-52.
21. Soli, S. D., Vermiglio, A., Wen, K., Laroche, C., Giguere, C., Iwaki, T., et al. (2002). Development of the Hearing In Noise Test (HINT) in New Languages. Short course presented at the 14th Convention of the American Academy of Audiology, Philadelphia, PA.
22. Zurek, P. M. (1993). Binaural advantages and directional effects in speech intelligibility. In G. A. Studebaker and I. Hockberg (Eds.), Acoustical Factors Affecting Hearing Aid Performance (pp. 255-276). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
23. Cheung, K. H. (1986). The phonology of present-day Cantonese. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
24. Kam, T. P. K. (1982). Speech audiometry test material in Cantonese. Unpublished master dissertation, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
25. Tse, A. C. Y. (1991). The Acquisition Process of Cantonese Phonology: A Case Study. Unpublished MPhil dissertation, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.