The listening in spatialized noise-sentences test (LISN-S): Test-retest reliability study

International Journal of Audiology

Volumn 46, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 145-153

  Cameron, Sharon ^a   Dillon, Harvey ^a  

^a NATIONAL ACOUSTIC LABORATORIES   (Australia)

Author keywords

Random measurement error; Reliability coefficient; Systematic error; Test retest reliability

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD; FEMALE; HEARING TEST; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LISTENING IN SPATIALIZED NOISE SENTENCES TEST; MALE; MICROCOMPUTER; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH AUDIOMETRY; TASK PERFORMANCE; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY;

AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NOISE; SPEECH PERCEPTION; SPEECH RECEPTION THRESHOLD TEST;

EID: 33947303362     PISSN: 14992027     EISSN: 17088186     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14992020601164170     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bamford, J. & Wilson, I. 1979. Methodological considerations and practical aspects of the BKB sentence lists. In J. Bench & J. Bamford (eds.) Speech-hearing Tests and the Spoken Language of Hearing-impaired Children. London, UK: Academic Press, pp. 146-187.
2. Bentler, R.A. 2000. List equivalency and test-retest reliability of the speech in noise test. Am J Audiol, 9(2), 84-100.
3. Bregman, A.S. 1990. Auditory Scene Analysis. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
4. Cacace, A.T. & McFarland, D.J. 1998. Central auditory processing disorder in school-aged children: A critical review. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 41, 355-373.
5. Cameron S. & Dillon H. (in press). The listening in spatialized noise-sentences test (LISN-S): Development, sentence normalization study and normative data study. Ear Hear.
6. Cameron S. & Dillon H. 2006. Listening in Spatialized Noise Test (LISN®)-Sentences (Version 1.0.0) [Computer software]. Sydney, NSW: National Acoustic Laboratories.
7. Cameron, S., Dillon, H. & Newall, P. 2006a. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test. Ear Hear, 27(1), 30-42.
8. Cameron, S., Dillon, H. & Newall, P. 2006b. Listening in spatialized noise test: Normative data for children. Int J Audiol, 45, 99-108.
9. Cameron, S., Dillon, H. & Newall, P. 2006c. The listening in spatialized noise test: An auditory processing disorder study. J Am Acad Audiol, 17(5), 304-318.
10. Cameron, S., Dillon, H. & Newall, P. 2005. Three case studies of children with suspected auditory processing disorder. Aust & NZ J Audiol, 27(2), 97-112.
11. Hernwig, L.H. & Olsen, S.Ø. 2005. Learning effect when using the Danish Hagerman sentences (Dantale II) to determine speech reception threshold. Int J Audiol, 44, 509-512.
12. Howell, D.C. 1997. Statistical methods for psychology. Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press.
13. Keith, R.W. 1986. SCAN: Screening Test for Auditory Processing Disorders in Children. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation.
14. Mackersie, C.L., Boothroyd, A. & Minniear, D. 2001. Evaluation of the computer-assisted speech perception assessment test (CASPA). J Am Acad Audiol, 12(8), 390-396.
15. McFarland, D.J. & Cacace, A.T. 2006. Current controversies in CAPD: From Procrustes' bed to Pandora's box. In T. Parthasarathy (ed.), An Introduction to Auditory Processing Disorders in Children. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 247-264.
16. McNemar, Q. 1969. Psychological Statistics. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
17. Ruscetta, M.N., Palmer, C.V., Durrant, J.D., Grayhack, J. & Ryan, C. 2005. Validity, internal consistency, and test/retest reliability of a localization disabilities and handicaps questionnaire. J Am Acad Audiol, 16, 585-595.
18. Sussman, E., Ritter, W. & Vaughan, H.G. 1999. An investigation of the auditory streaming effect using event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology, 36, 22-34.
19. Wagener, K.C. & Brand, T. 2005. Sentence intelligibility in noise for listeners with normal hearing and hearing impairment: Influence of measurement procedure and masking parameters. Int J Audiol, 44, 144-156.
20. Wagener, K., Josvassen, J.L. & Ardenkjær, R. 2003. Design, optimization and evaluation of a Danish sentence test in noise. Int J Audiol, 42, 10-17.