Experiencing the end and afterlives of International Relations/theory

European Journal of International Relations

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 609-626

  Sylvester, Christine ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

feminist International Relations; International Relations; International Relations camps; International Relations debates; International Relations journals; International Relations theory; International Relations war studies

Indexed keywords

EID: 84883620112     PISSN: 13540661     EISSN: 14603713     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1354066113494322     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. Alison MWomen and Violence: Female Combatants in Ethno-National Conflict. London: Routledge; 2009:.
2. Ashley R,Walker R.Reading dissidence/writing the discipline: Crisis and the question of sovereignty in International Relations theory.International Studies Quarterly. 1990;34 (3): 367-416.
3. Baaz ME,Stern MThe Complexity of Violence: A Critical Analysis of Sexual Violence in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). Stockholm: SIDA; 2010:.
4. Baaz ME,Stern MSexual Violence as a Weapon of War? Perceptions, Prescriptions, Problems in the Congo and Beyond. London: Zed; 2013:.
5. Barkawi TGlobalization and War. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield; 2006:.
6. Barkawi T.From war to security: Security studies, the wider agenda and the fate of the study of war.Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2011;39 (3): 701-716.
7. Baudrillard JThe Conspiracy of Art. Lotringer S, ed. New York: Semiotext(e); 2005:.
8. Belting HArt History after Modernism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 2003:.
9. Burke ABeyond Security, Ethics and Violence: War against the Other. London: Routledge; 2007:.
10. Buzan B,Hansen LThe Evolution of International Security Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009:.
11. Camilleri J,Falk RThe End of Sovereignty? The Politics of a Shrinking and Fragmented World. Aldershot: Elgar; 1992:.
12. Critical approaches to security in Europe: A networked manifesto.Security Dialogue. 2006;37 (4): 443-487.
13. Mitchell WJT, ed. 2004:.
14. Danto AAfter the End of Art: Contemporary Art and the Pale of History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1997:.
15. Danto A.A commentary on the end of art: What you think is what it is.Art Newspaper. 2002;125:31.
16. International Interactions. Davenport CMoore W, ed. 2012:704-713.
17. D'Costa BFeminist Methodologies for International Relations. Ackerly BStern MTrue J, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006:129-152.
18. Derrida JLife.After.Theory. Payne MSchad J, ed. London: Continuum; 2003:1-51.
19. Diken B,Laustsen CBThe Culture of Exception: Sociology Facing the Camp. London: Routledge; 2005:.
20. Dillon M.Virtual security: A life science of (dis)order.Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2003;32 (3): 531-558.
21. Duffield MGlobal Governance and the New Wars: The Merging of Development and Security. London: Zed; 2001:.
22. Eagleton TAfter Theory. London: Allen Lane, Penguin; 2003:.
23. Enloe CInternational Theory: Beyond Positivism. Smith SBooth KZalewski M, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996:186-202.
24. Enloe CNimo's War, Emma's War: Making Feminist Sense of the Iraq War. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 2010:.
25. Towards a Just World Order. Falk RKim SMendlovitz S, ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press; 1982:.
26. Ferguson Y,Mansbach RThe Elusive Quest: Theory and International Politics. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press; 1988:.
27. Ferguson Y,Mansbach R.Between celebration and despair: Constructive suggestions for future international theory.International Studies Quarterly. 1991;35 (4): 363-386.
28. Fukuyama F.The end of history?.National Interest. 1989;16 (3): 3-18.
29. Hall T,Yarhi-Milo K.The personal touch: Leaders' impressions, costly signaling, and assessments of sincerity in international affairs.International Studies Quarterly. 2012;56 (3): 560-573.
30. Hansen L.The Little Mermaid's secret security dilemma and the absence of gender in the Copenhagen School.Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2000;29 (2): 285-306.
31. Hansen L.Gender, nation, rape: Bosnia and the construction of security.International Feminist Journal of Politics. 2001;3 (1): 55-75.
32. Hansen LSecurity as Practice: Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War. London: Routledge; 2006:.
33. Harding SThe Science Question in Feminism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 1986:.
34. Hatemi P,McDermott R.A neurobiological approach to foreign policy analysis: Identifying individual differences in political violence.Foreign Policy Analysis. 2012;8 (2): 111-129.
35. Hay CInternational Relations: Discipline and Diversity. Dunne TKurki MSmith S, ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010:78-97.
36. Hellmann G.Introduction by Guest Editor: IR/foreign policy theory and German foreign policy.Journal of International Relations and Development. 2009;12:251-256.
37. Holzner BExperiencing War. Sylvester C, ed. London: Routledge; 2011:42-63.
38. Horgan JThe End of Science: Facing the Limits of Knowledge in the Twilight of the Scientific Age. New York: Broadway Books; 1997:.
39. Hutchings KExperiencing War. Sylvester C, ed. London: Routledge; 2011:28-41.
40. Huysmans JThe Politics of Insecurity: Security, Migration, and Asylum in the EU. London: Routledge; 2006:.
41. Inayatullah N,Blaney DLInternational Relations and the Problem of Difference. New York: Routledge; 2004:.
42. Jackson PTThe Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations. New York: Routledge; 2011:.
43. Jacoby TFeminist Methodologies for International Relations. Ackerly BStern MTrue J, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006:153-173.
44. Kertzer JD,McGraw KM.Folk realism: Testing the microfoundations of realism in ordinary citizens.International Studies Quarterly. 2012;56 (2): 229-438.
45. Kornprobst M.International Relations as rhetorical discipline: Toward (re-)newing horizons.International Studies Review. 2009;11:87-108.
46. Kristensen P.Dividing discipline: Structures of communication in International Relations.International Studies Review. 2012;14 (1): 32-50.
47. Kronsell AFeminist Methodologies for International Relations. Ackerly BStern MTrue J, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006:108-128.
48. Making Gender, Making War: Violence, Military, and Peacekeeping Practices. Kronsell ASvedberg E, ed. London: Routledge; 2012:.
49. Kurki M.The limitations of the critical edge: Reflections on critical and philosophical IR scholarship today.Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2011;40 (1): 129-146.
50. MacKenzie M.Securitization and desecuritization: Female soldiers and the reconstruction of women in post-conflict Sierra Leone.Security Studies. 2009;18 (2): 241-261.
51. MacKenzie MFemale Soldiers in Sierra Leone: Sex, Security, and Post-Conflict Development. New York: New York University Press; 2012:.
52. McKibben BThe End of Nature. New York: Peter Smith; 2001:.
53. War and the Body: Militarisation, Practice and Experience. McSorley K, ed. London: Routledge; 2013:.
54. Maliniak D,Oakes A,Peterson S, et al.International Relations in the US academy.International Studies Quarterly. 2011;55 (2): 437-464.
55. Managhan TGender, Agency and War: The Maternalized Body in US Foreign Policy. London: Routledge; 2012:.
56. Mearsheimer J,Walt SThe Israel Lobby and American Foreign Policy. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux; 2007:.
57. Mearsheimer J,Walt S.Is it love or the lobby? Explaining American's special relationship with Israel.Security Studies. 2009;18 (1): 58-78.
58. Mearsheimer J,Walt SFaculty Research. Harvard Kennedy School of Government; 2013:.
59. Special Issue: Out of the ivory tower. 2012;40 (3):.
60. Miller D.Storming the palace in political science: The perestroika moment.Chronicle of Higher Education. 2001;:A16.
61. Muppidi HThe Politics of the Global. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press; 2004:.
62. Noever PThe End of Architecture. New York: Prestel; 1993:.
63. Olesen T.Global injustice memories: The 1994 Rwanda genocide.International Political Sociology. 2012;6 (4): 373-389.
64. Parashar S.Feminist International Relations and militant women: Case studies from Sri Lanka and Kashmir.Cambridge Review of International Affairs. 2009;22 (2): 235-256.
65. Parashar SInternational Studies Review. Sylvester C, ed. 2011:696-699.
66. Paris R.Human security: Paradigm shift or hot air?.International Security. 2001;26 (2): 87-102.
67. Park-Kang SGender, Agency and Political Violence. Åhäll LShepherd LJ, ed. London: Palgrave; 2012:115-131.
68. Patterson E.Obama and sustainable democracy promotion.International Studies Perspectives. 2012;13:26-42.
69. Penttinen EJoy and International Relations: A New Methodology. London: Routledge; 2013:.
70. Reus-Smit C.International Relations, irrelevant? Don't blame theory.Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2012;40 (3): 525-540.
71. Rowe CAnti-War Actions and the Performative Construction of the War on Terror. London: Routledge; 2013:.
72. Scarry EThe Body in Pain: The Making and Unmaking of the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1985:.
73. Gender and International Security: Feminist Perspectives. Sjoberg L, ed. New York: Routledge; 2009:.
74. Skidmore D.The Obama presidency and US foreign policy: Where's the multilateralism?.International Studies Perspectives. 2012;13:43-64.
75. Skjelsbaek IThe Political Psychology of Rape: Bosnia and Herzegovina. London: Routledge; 2012:.
76. Smith SInternational Relations Theory Today. Booth KSmith S, ed. University Park, PA: University of Pennsylvlania Press; 1995:1-37.
77. Smith SInternational Relations: Discipline and Diversity. Dunne TKurki MSmith S, ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010:1-13.
78. Stern MNaming Security - Constructing Identity: 'Mayan Women' in Guatemala on the Eve of 'Peace'. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 2005:.
79. Sylvester C.Whither the international at the end of IR.Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2007a;35 (3): 551-573.
80. Sylvester C.Anatomy of a footnote.Security Dialogue. 2007b;38 (4): 557-558.
81. Sylvester CArt/Museums: International Relations Where We Least Expect It. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers; 2009:.
82. Experiencing War. Sylvester C, ed. London: Routledge; 2011:.
83. Sylvester C.War experiences/war practices/war theory.Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2012;40 (3): 483-503.
84. Sylvester CWar as Experience: Contributions from International Relations and Feminist Analysis. London: Routledge; 2013:.
85. Tickner AGender in International Relations: Feminist Perspectives on Achieving Global Security. New York: Columbia University Press; 1992:.
86. Towns AWomen and States: Norms and Hierarchies in International Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2004:.
87. Wæver OInternational Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Dunne TKurki MSmith S, ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010:.
88. Weldes JConstructing National Interests: The United States and the Cuban Missile Crisis. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press; 1999:.
89. Wibben AFeminist Security Studies: A Narrative Approach. London: Routledge; 2011:.