Dividing discipline: Structures of communication in international relations

International Studies Review

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 32-50

  Kristensen, Peter M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION; INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS; LITERATURE REVIEW; POLITICAL ECONOMY;

EID: 84859048674     PISSN: 15219488     EISSN: 14682486     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2486.2012.01101.x     Document Type: Review

References (69)

1. Adler, Emanuel, and, Louis Pauly,. (2007) Editors' Note. International Organization 61: 1-7.
2. Ahlgren, Per, Bo Jarneving, and, Ronald Rousseau,. (2003) Requirements for a Cocitation Similarity Measure, with Special Reference to Pearson's Correlation Coefficient. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 54: 550-560.
3. Ashworth, Lucian,. (2002) Did the Realist-Idealist Great Debate Really Happen? A Revisionist History of International Relations. International Relations 16: 33-51.
4. Aydinli, Ersel, and, Julie Mathews,. (2000) Are the Core and Periphery Irreconcilable? The Curious World of Publishing in Contemporary International Relations. International Studies Perspectives 1: 289-303.
5. Boyack, Kevin, Richard Klavans, and, Katy Börner,. (2005) Mapping the Backbone of Science. Scientometrics 64: 351-374. (Pubitemid 41152144)
6. Breuning, Marijke,. (2010) Women and Publishing in International Studies. In International Studies Encyclopedia, A Component of the International Studies Compendium Project, edited by, Robert A. Denemark,. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
7. Breuning, Marijke, Joseph Bredehoft, and, Eugene Walton,. (2005) Promise and Performance: An Evaluation of Journals in International Relations. International Studies Perspectives 6: 447-461. (Pubitemid 41801158)
8. Brill, Margaret,. (1990) Government Publications as Bibliographic References in the Periodical Literature of International Relations: A Citation Analysis. Government Information Quarterly 7: 427-439.
9. Buzan, Barry, and, Richard Little,. (2001) Why International Relations Has Failed as an Intellectual Project and What to Do About It. Millennium-Journal of International Studies 30: 19-39. (Pubitemid 33816914)
10. Carlsnaes, Walter, Thomas Risse, and, Beth Simmons,. (2002) Handbook of International Relations. London: SAGE.
11. Crawford, Robert, and, Darryl Jarvis,. (2001) International Relations: Still an American Social Science? Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
12. Dunne, Tim, Milja Kurki, and, Steve Smith,. (2010) International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13. Fowler, James, Bernard Grofman, and, Natalie Masuoka,. (2007) Social Networks in Political Science: Hiring and Placement of Ph.D.s, 1960-2002. PS: Political Science and Politics 40: 729-739.
14. Freeman, Linton,. (1977) A Set of Measures of Centrality Based on Betweenness. Sociometry 40: 35-41.
15. Freeman, Linton,. (1979) Centrality in Social Networks Conceptual Clarification. Social Networks 1: 215-239.
16. Garand, James, and, Micheal Giles,. (2003) Journals in the Discipline: A Report on a New Survey of American Political Scientists. Political Science and Politics 36: 293-308. (Pubitemid 36539774)
17. Garfield, Eugene,. (1955) Citation Indexes to Science: A New Dimension in Documentation through Association of Ideas. Science 122: 108-111.
18. George, Alexander,. (1993) Bridging the Gap: Theory and Practice in Foreign Policy. Washington: United States Institute of Peace Press.
19. Giles, Micheal, and, James Garand,. (2007) Ranking Political Science Journals: Reputational and Citational Approaches. PS: Political Science and Politics 40: 741-751.
20. Giles, Micheal, Francie Mizell, and, David Patterson,. (1989) Political Scientists' Journal Evaluations Revisited. PS: Political Science and Politics 22: 613-617.
21. Goldmann, Kjell,. (1995) Im Westen Nichts Neues: Seven International Relations Journals in 1972 and 1992. European Journal of International Relations 1: 245-258.
22. Hellmann, Gunther,. (2009) Introduction by Guest Editor: IR/Foreign Policy Theory and German Foreign Policy. Journal of International Relations and Development 12: 251-256.
23. Hellmann, Gunther, and, Harald Müller,. (2003) Editing (I)nternational (R)elations: A Changing World. Journal of International Relations and Development 6: 372-389. (Pubitemid 38502645)
24. Hermann, Margaret,. (1998) One Field, Many Perspectives: Building the Foundations for Dialogue. International Studies Quarterly 42: 605-624. (Pubitemid 29132219)
25. Hoffmann, Stanley,. (1977) An American Social Science: International Relations. Daedalus 106: 41-60.
26. Holsti, Kalevi,. (1985) The Dividing Discipline: Hegemony and Diversity in International Theory. Boston, MA: Allen & Unwin.
27. Von Isenburg, Megan,. (2009) Evidence Summary: Scholars in International Relations Cite Books More Frequently than Journals: More Research Is Needed to Better Understand Research Behaviour and Use. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice 4: 49-51.
28. Jackson, Robert, and, Georg Sorensen,. (2006) Introduction to International Relations: Theories and Approaches, 3rd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29. Jentleson, Bruce,. (2002) The Need for Praxis: Bringing Policy Relevance Back In. International Security 26: 169-183.
30. Jones, Adam, and, Kalevi Holsti,. (2002) Interview with Kal Holsti. Review of International Studies 28: 619-633.
31. Kahler, Miles,. (1993) International Relations: Still an American Science? In Ideas and Ideals: Essays in Honor of Stanley Hoffmann, edited by, Linda B. Miller, and, Michael Smith,. Boulder: Westview Press.
32. Kahler, Miles,. (1997) Inventing International Relations: International Relations Theory After 1945. In New Thinking in International Relations Theory, edited by, Michael Doyle, and, John Ikenberry,. Boulder: Westview Press.
33. Kamada, Tomihisa, and, Satoru Kawai,. (1989) An Algorithm for Drawing General Undirected Graphs. Information Processing Letters 31: 7-15.
34. Kornprobst, Markus,. (2009) International Relations as Rhetorical Discipline: Toward (Re-)Newing Horizons. International Studies Review 11: 87-108.
35. Lebow, Richard,. (2007) Social Science as an Ethical Practice. Journal of International Relations and Development 10: 16-24. (Pubitemid 46505773)
36. Lepgold, Joseph,. (1998) Is Anyone Listening? International Relations Theory and the Problem of Policy Relevance. Political Science Quarterly 113: 43-62.
37. Leydesdorff, Loet,. (2005) Similarity Measures, Author Cocitation Analysis, and Information Theory. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 56: 769-772. (Pubitemid 40751667)
38. Leydesdorff, Loet,. (2007a) Visualization of the Citation Impact Environments of Scientific Journals: An Online Mapping Exercise. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58: 25-38. (Pubitemid 46051781)
39. Leydesdorff, Loet,. (2007b) Betweenness Centrality as an Indicator of the Interdisciplinarity of Scientific Journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58: 1303-1319. (Pubitemid 47153973)
40. Leydesdorff, Loet, and, Ismael Rafols,. (2009) A Global Map of Science Based on the ISI Subject Categories. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60: 348-362.
41. Leydesdorff, Loet, and, Ismael Rafols,. (2011) Indicators of the Interdisciplinarity of Journals: Diversity, Centrality, and Citations. Journal of Informetrics 5: 87-100.
42. Maliniak, Daniel, Amy Oakes, Susan Peterson, and, Michael Tierney,. (2008) Women in International Relations. Politics and Gender 4: 122-144.
43. Maliniak, Daniel, Richard Jordan, Amy Oakes, Susan Peterson, and, Michael Tierney,. (2009) One Discipline or Many? TRIP Survey of International Relations Faculty in Ten Countries. Available at. (Accessed May 29, 2011.)
44. Maliniak, Daniel, Amy Oakes, Susan Peterson, and, Michael J. Tierney,. (2011) International Relations in the US Academy. International Studies Quarterly 55: 437-464.
45. Mansbach, Richard,. (2002) Deterritorializing Global Politics. In Visions of International Relations: Assessing an Academic Field, edited by, Donald Puchala,. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
46. Meho, Lokman, and, Kiduk Yang,. (2007) Impact of Data Sources on Citation Counts and Rankings of LIS Faculty: Web of Science versus Scopus and Google Scholar. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58: 2105-2125. (Pubitemid 350229712)
47. Nisonger, Thomas,. (1994) A Methodological Issue Concerning the Use of Social Sciences Citation Index Journal Citation Reports Impact Factor Data for Journal Ranking. Library Acquisitions: Practice & Theory 18: 447-458.
48. Norris, Pippa, and, Ivor Crewe,. (1993) The Reputation of Political Science Journals: Pluralist and Consensus Views. Political Studies 41: 5-23.
49. Nye, Joseph,. (2008) Bridging the Gap between Theory and Policy. Political Psychology 29: 593-603.
50. Price, Derek de Solla,. (1965) Networks of Scientific Papers. Science 149: 510-515.
51. Price, Derek de Solla,. (1986) Little Science, Big Science.and Beyond. New York: Columbia University Press.
52. Pudovkin, Alexander, and, Eugene Garfield,. (2002) Algorithmic Procedure for Finding Semantically Related Journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 53: 1113-1119. (Pubitemid 35359180)
53. Quirk, Joel, and, Darshan Vigneswaran,. (2005) The Construction of an Edifice: The Story of a First Great Debate. Review of International Studies 31: 89-107. (Pubitemid 40180165)
54. Russett, Bruce, and, Taylor Arnold,. (2010) Who Talks, and Who's Listening? Networks of International Security Studies. Security Dialogue 41: 589-598.
55. Sillanpää, Antti, and, Tommi Koivula,. (2010) Mapping Conflict Research: A Bibliometric Study of Contemporary Scientific Discourses. International Studies Perspectives 11: 148-171.
56. Smith, Steve,. (2000) The Discipline of International Relations: Still an American Social Science? British Journal of Politics and International Relations 2: 374-402.
57. Soreanu, Raluca, and, David Hudson,. (2008) Feminist Scholarship in International Relations and the Politics of Disciplinary Emotion. Millennium-Journal of International Studies 37: 123-151.
58. Su, Xinning, Xinming Han, and, Xinning Han,. (2001) Developing the Chinese Social Science Citation Index. Online Information Review 25: 365-369.
59. Sylvester, Christine,. (2007) Whither the International at the End of IR. Millennium-Journal of International Studies 35: 551-573.
60. Tickner, Arlene,. (2003) Seeing IR Differently: Notes from the Third World. Millennium-Journal of International Studies 32: 295-324. (Pubitemid 38762593)
61. Tickner, Arlene, and, Ole Wæver,. (2009) International Relations Scholarship Around the World. London: Routledge.
62. Wæver, Ole,. (1998) The Sociology of a Not So International Discipline: American and European Developments in International Relations. International Organization 52: 687-727.
63. Wæver, Ole,. (2007) The Social and Intellectual Structure of the IR Discipline. Paper presented at the 48th annual convention of International Studies Association.
64. Wæver, Ole,. (2010) Still a Discipline After All These Debates? In International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, edited by, Tim Dunne, Milja Kurki, and, Steve Smith,. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
65. Walt, Stephen,. (2005) The Relations between Theory and Policy in International Relations. Annual Review of Political Science 8: 23-48.
66. Waltz, Kenneth,. (1979) Theory of International Politics. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
67. Whitley, Richard,. (1984) The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
68. Wilson, Peter,. (1998) The Myth of the "First Great Debate." Review of International Studies 24: 1-15.
69. Zhang, Li,. (2007) Citation Analysis for Collection Development: A Study of International Relations Journal Literature. Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services 31: 195-207.