Paradigms and Theory Building in the Domain of Business Families

Family Business Review

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 167-180

  Moores, Ken ^a  

^a BOND UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

familiness; paradigm; theory building; Three circle model

Indexed keywords

EID: 84883546391     PISSN: 08944865     EISSN: 17416248     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0894486509333372     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Existence, relatedness, & growth. New York: Free Press; 1972:.
2. The pervasive effects of family on entrepreneurship: Toward a family embeddedness perspective.Journal of Business Venturing. 2003;18:573-596.
3. The entrepreneurship of resource-based theory.Journal of Management. 2001;27 (6): 755-775.
4. Value creation in e-business.Strategic Management Journal. 2001;22:493-520.
5. Knowledge transfer in organizations: Learning from the experience of others.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 2000;82:1-8.
6. Learning orientation, market orientation, and innovation: Integrating and extending models of organisational performance.Journal of Market Focused Management. 1999;4:295-308.
7. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage.Journal of Management. 1991;17:99-120.
8. The resource-based view: Origins and implications Handbook of strategic management. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell; 2001:124-188.
9. Studying the family enterprise holistically: Evidence for integrated family and business systems.Family Business Review. 2009;22:82-95.
10. Organisational learning, learning culture, learning climate and perceived innovation in Jordanian organisations.International Journal of Training and Development. 2005;9:96-109.
11. The modern corporation and private property. New York: Macmillan; 1932:.
12. Creating a learning organisation within the family business: An Irish perspective.Journal of European Industrial Training. 2005;29:730-750.
13. Experiment and theory in physics. New York: Dover; 1956:.
14. Corporate governance and competitive-advantage in family-controlled firms.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2005;29:249-265.
15. Trends and directions in the development of a strategic management theory of the family firm.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2005;29:555-575.
16. The ongoing process of building a theory of disruption.Journal of Product Innovation Management. 2006;23:39-55.
17. A ten-year investigation of strategy, systems and environment upon innovation in family firms.Family Business Review. 2006;19:1-10.
18. Incorporating the family dynamic into the entrepreneurship process.Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development. 2002;9 (4): 416-430.
19. A Kuhnian interpretation of the historical evolution of accounting.Accounting Historians Journal. 1989;16 (2): 1-41.
20. The acquisition, transfer and depreciation of knowledge in service organizations: Productivity in franchises.Management Science. 1995;41:1750-1762.
21. The influence of life stage on father-son work relation in family companies. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms Inc; 1982:.
22. Toward a stewardship theory of management.Academy of Management Review. 1997;22:20-47.
23. Planning as learning.Harvard Business Review. 1988;66 (2): 70-74.
24. A test: Can stewardship theory serve as a second conceptual foundation for accountability methods in contracted human services.International Journal of Public Administration. 2002;25:463-487.
25. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields.American Sociological Review. 1983;48:147-160.
26. Organizational learning: A review of some literatures.Organization Studies. 1993;14:375-394.
27. CEO governance and shareholder returns: Agency theory or stewardship theory. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management; Washington, DC;.
28. Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns.Australian Journal of Management. 1991;16:49-64.
29. Theory building. New York: Free Press; 1969:.
30. Entrepreneurship and family business: Exploring the connections.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 1994;19:71-84.
31. Current state of family business theory and practice. Family Business Review 1988-1997.Family Business Review. 1998;11:287-296.
32. Building theories from case study research.Academy Management Review. 1989;14:532-550.
33. An exploratory comparison of the behavioral dynamics of top management teams in family and non-family new ventures: Cohesion, conflict, potency, and consensus.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2005;29:267-284.
34. Separation of ownership and control.Journal of Law Economics. 1983;26:301-325.
35. Building a learning organization.Harvard Business Review. 1993;71 (4): 78-91.
36. Learning organizations come alive.Training and Development. 1996;50 (12): 35-45.
37. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm.Strategic Management Journal. 1996;17:109-122.
38. A resource-based framework for assessing the strategic advantages of family firms.Family Business Review. 1999;12:1-25.
39. A unified systems perspective of family firm performance.Journal of Business Venturing. 2003;18:451-465.
40. Entrepreneurship as radical change in the family business: Exploring the role of cultural patterns.Family Business Review. 2001;14:193-208.
41. Emerging paths of family entrepreneurship research.Journal of Small Business Management. 2008;46:317-330.
42. Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures.Organization Science. 1991;2:88-113.
43. Owner as manager, extended horizons and the family firm.International Journal of the Economics of Business. 1999;6:41-55.
44. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure.Journal of Financial Economics. 1976;3:305-360.
45. Family firm resource management: Commentary and extensions.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2005;29:313-319.
46. The link between individual and organizational learning.Sloan Management Review. 1993;35:37-50.
47. Family influence on value creation. Trier: University of Trier; 2005:.
48. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: Chicago University Press; 1970:.
49. A new look at the description and prescription of systems.Behavioral Science. 1977;22:197-206.
50. The effects of parental altruism on the governance of family-managed firms.Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2005;26:313-330.
51. Enhancing entrepreneurial orientation research: Operationalizing and measuring a key strategic decision making process.Journal of Management. 2000;26:1055-1085.
52. From entrepreneurial orientation to "family orientation": Generational differences in the management of family business. Proceedings of the 23rd annual Entrepreneurship Research Conference; Babson Park, MA: Babson College;.
53. Motivation and personality. New York: Harper and Row; 1970:.
54. Power the inner experience. New York: Irving; 1975:.
55. The entrepreneurial mindset: Strategies for continuously creating opportunity in an age of uncertainty. Boston: Harvard Business School Press; 2000:.
56. Leadership and motivation: Essays of Douglas McGregor. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1966:.
57. The effect of founding family influence on firm value and corporate governance.Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting. 2001;12:236-259.
58. Leaning family business: Paradoxes and pathways. Aldershot: Ashgate; 2002:.
59. Balanced scorecards to drive the strategic planning of family firms.Family Business Review. 2005;18 (2): 105-122.
60. The salience of markets, bureaucratic, and clan controls in the management of family firm transitions: some tentative.Australian evidence. Family Business Review. 2000;13 (2): 91-106.
61. Analyzing the dearth in family business research Theoretical developments and future research in family business. Charlotte, NC: Information Age; 2008:3-26.
62. Entrepreneurial orientation, risk taking, and performance in family firms.Family Business Review. 2007;20:33-58.
63. The knowledge-creating company.Harvard Business Review. 1991;69 (6): 96-104.
64. Clarifying the familiness construct: A social capital perspective.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2008;32:949-969.
65. The learning company: A strategy for sustainable development. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1991:.
66. The theory of the growth of the firm. 1959). The theory of the growth of the firm (3rd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1959:.
67. The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view.Strategic Management Journal. 1993;14:179-191.
68. Theoretical developments and future research in family business. Charlotte, NC: Information Age; 2008:.
69. Family business. Mason, OH: Thomson South-Western; 2007:.
70. Agency Relationships in Family Firms: Theory and Evidence.Organization Science. 2001;12 (2): 99-116.
71. Toward a theory of agency and altruism in family firms.Journal of Business Venturing. 2003;18:473-490.
72. The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Random House; 1990:.
73. Familiness: Capital stocks and flows between family and business.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2008;32:971-977.
74. Strategic management of the family business: Past research and future challenges.Family Business Review. 1997;10:1-35.
75. The practice driven evolution of family business education.Journal of Business Research. 2007;60:1012-1021.
76. Strategic divestments in family firms: Role of family structure and community culture.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2005;29:293-311.
77. A classification scheme for family firms: From family values to effective governance to firm performance Family values and value creation: How do family-owned businesses foster enduring values. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2008:71-101.
78. Large shareholders and corporate control.Journal of Political Economy. 1986;94:461-488.
79. Family firms and entrepreneurial orientation in publicly traded firms.Family Business Review. 2009;22:9-24.
80. Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management, and wealth creation in family firms.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2003;27:339-358.
81. Bivalent attributes of the family firms.Family Business Review. 1996;9:199-208.
82. Keeping the family business healthy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1987:.
83. Stewards, agents, and the founder discount: Executive compensation in new ventures.Academy of Management Journal. 2006;49:960-976.
84. Creating the learning organisation. Alexandria, VA: ASTD; 1996:.
85. Middle range theories of social systems.Behavioral Science. 1974;19:357-367.
86. A resource-based view of the firm.Strategic Management Journal. 1984;5:171-180.
87. Modeling theoretical propositions Designing research for publication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2008:217-250.
88. The learning organisation: Theory and practice.Myths and Realities. 2000;12:1-5.
89. Agency trade-offs in family firms: Theoretical model and implications. Bond University; 2008:.
90. Entrepreneurial risk taking in family firms.Family Business Review. 2005;18:23-40.
91. Entrepreneurship in family vs. non-family firms: A resource-based analysis of the effect of organizational culture.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2004;28:363-381.
92. Organizational culture and entrepreneurship in family firms: A resource-based analysis. Paper presented at the second annual conference on Theories of the Family Enterprise; Philadelphia;.
93. Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy.Academy of Management Review. 2002;27:414-432.