Family Firms and Entrepreneurial Orientation in Publicly Traded Firms: A Comparative Analysis of the S&P 500

Family Business Review

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 9-24

  Short, Jeremy C ^a   Payne, G Tyge ^a   Brigham, Keith H ^a   Lumpkin, G T ^a   Broberg, J Christian ^b  

^a TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

content analysis; entrepreneurial orientation; family firms

Indexed keywords

EID: 84900128604     PISSN: 08944865     EISSN: 17416248     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0894486508327823     Document Type: Article

References (115)

1. Organizational identity.Research in Organizational Behavior. 1985;7:263-295.
2. The pervasive effects of family on entrepreneurship: Toward a family embeddedness perspective.Journal of Business Venturing. 2003;18:576-96.
3. Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500.The Journal of Finance. 2003;58:1301-1328.
4. Rear view mirror.Computerworld. 1998;32 (9): 63-65.
5. Commentary on the special issue: The emergence of a field.Journal of Business Venturing. 2003;18:567-573.
6. Founder centrality effects on the Mexican family firm's top management group: Firm culture, strategic vision and goals, and firm performance.Journal of World Business. 2002;37:139-150.
7. Toward a contingency model of strategic risk taking.Academy of Management Review. 1985;10:230-243.
8. Cognitive change, strategic action, and organizational renewal.Strategic Management Journal. 1992;13:15-36.
9. A quantitative content analysis of the characteristics of rapid-growth firms and their founders.Journal of Business Venturing. 2005;20:663-687.
10. Working in small family businesses: Empirical comparisons to non-family businesses.Journal of Organizational Behavior. 1997;18:297-312.
11. Family business research: The evolution of an academic field.Family Business Review. 2002;15:337-350.
12. Charisma under crisis: Presidential leadership, rhetoric, and media responses before and after the September 11th terrorist attacks.The Leadership Quarterly. 2004;15:211-239.
13. Autonomy of individuals and organizations: Towards a strategy research agenda.International Journal of Business and Economics. 2003;2:57-73.
14. Strategy, annual reports, and alchemy.California Management Review. 1978;20:64-71.
15. Content analysis of annual reports for corporate strategy and risk.Interfaces. 1984;14:61-71.
16. Risk taking propensity of entrepreneurs.Academy of Management Journal. 1980;23:509-520.
17. A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm.Administrative Science Quarterly. 1983;28:223-244.
18. Essai sur la nature du commerce en general [Essay on the nature of trade in general]. London: Macmillan; 1734:.
19. Extracting team mental models through textual analysis.Journal of Organizational Behavior. 1997;18:533-558.
20. Corporate governance and competitive advantage in family-controlled firms.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2005;29:249-265.
21. Top management team compensation: The missing link between CEO pay and firm performance.Strategic Management Journal. 2002;23:367-375.
22. Issues of research design and construct measurement in entrepreneurship research: The past decade.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2001;25:101-113.
23. Speed, stealth and selective attack: How small firms differ from large firms in competitive behavior.Academy of Management Journal. 1995;38:453-482.
24. Trends and directions in the development of a strategic management theory of the family firm.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2005;29:555-576.
25. Defining the family business by behavior.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 1999;23:19-39.
26. Differential patterns of textual characteristics and company performance in the chairman's statement.Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal. 2006;19:493-511.
27. Private shareholder response to corporate annual reports.Accounting and Finance. 1982;22:53-72.
28. Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments.Strategic Management Journal. 1989;10:75-87.
29. Productivity and corporate governance in smaller firms.Small Business Economics. 2003;20:335-344.
30. An empirical examination of ownership structure in family and professionally managed firms.Family Business Review. 1992;5:117-136.
31. Ownership structure, strategic posture, and firm growth: An empirical examination.Family Business Review. 1994;7:237-249.
32. Hypercompetition. New York: Free Press; 1994:.
33. Crisis and the content of managerial communications: A study of the focus of attention of top managers in surviving and failing firms.Administrative Science Quarterly. 1990;35:634-657.
34. In the founder's shadow: Conflict in the family firm.Family Business Review. 1999;12:311-323.
35. Earnings management and corporate ownership structure: an examination of extra-ordinary item reporting.Journal of Business Finance and Accounting. 1993;20:479-500.
36. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields.American Sociological Review. 1983;48:147-160.
37. The ownership structure of UK firms and the informativeness of accounting earnings.Accounting and Business Research. 2002;32 (4): 245-257.
38. A content analysis of the content analysis literature in organizational studies: Research themes, data sources, and methodological refinements.Organizational Research Methods. 2007;10:5-34.
39. Examining the "family effect" on firm performance.Family Business Review. 2006;19:253-273.
40. Entrepreneurship and family business: Exploring the connections.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 1994;19:71-84.
41. Family firms and social responsibility: Preliminary evidence from the S&P 500.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2006;30:785-802.
42. Destructive and productive family relationships: A stewardship theory perspective.Journal of Business Venturing. 2007;22:545-565.
43. Making fast strategic decisions in high- velocity environments.Academy of Management Journal. 1989;32:543-576.
44. Research methods in the social sciences. Madison, WI: WCB Brown & Benchmark; 1994:.
45. An exploratory comparison of the behavioral dynamics of top management teams in family and nonfamily new ventures: Cohesion, conflict, potency, and consensus.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2005;29:267-284.
46. Strategic leadership: Top executives and their effects on organizations. New York: West; 1996:.
47. Corporate communications: Comparing executives' private and public statements.Academy of Management Journal. 1995;38:522-536.
48. Chairman's message to shareholders in Ford Motor Company's 2001 annual report. 2001 2008:.
49. Conflict avoidance in consensual decision processes.Small Group Behavior. 1985;16:487-499.
50. Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from spanish olive oil mills.Administrative Science Quarterly. 2007;52:106-137.
51. The determinants of executive compensation in family controlled public corporations.Academy of Management Journal. 2003;46:226-239.
52. Annual reports serving as a dual marketing function.Public Relations Quarterly. 1980;36:21-24.
53. Enterprising families domain: Family-influenced ownership groups in pursuit of transgenerational wealth.Family Business Review. 2002;15:223-238.
54. Theories of organizations. New York: Wiley; 1980:.
55. Mutlivariate data analysis. 1987). Mutlivariate data analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan.New York: Macmillan; 1987:.
56. Entrepreneurship as radical change in the family business: Exploring the role of cultural patterns.Family Business Review. 2001;14:193-208.
57. The future of management. Boston: Harvard Business School Press; 2007:.
58. Is strategy different for the family owned business.Family Business Review. 1994;7:159-174.
59. DICTION 5.0: The text-analysis program. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2000:.
60. Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1969:.
61. Strategy formulation in small business: A conceptual framework.Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship. 1992;9:71-76.
62. Owner as manager, extended horizons and the family firm.International Journal of the Economics of Business. 1999;6:55-69.
63. Victims of groupthink. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin; 1972:.
64. Real versus sample-based differences in comparative family business research.Family Business Review. 2005;3:229-246.
65. Espoused values and organizational change themes.Academy of Management Journal. 1995;38:1075-1104.
66. An exploratory study of family member characteristics and involvement: Effects on entrepreneurial behavior in the family firm.Family Business Review. 2008;21:1-14.
67. Founder centrality and strategic behavior in the family-owned firm.Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice. 2000;25:27-42.
68. What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning.Organization Science. 1996;7:502-518.
69. Assessing the psychometric properties of the entrepreneurial orientation scale: A multi-country analysis.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2002;26:71-94.
70. Research note: Comparison of small businesses with family participation versus small businesses without family participation: An investigation of differences in goals, attitudes, and family/business conflict.Family Business Review. 1996;9:423-437.
71. Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance.Academy of Management Review. 1996;21:135-172.
72. Enhancing entrepreneurial orientation research: Operationalizing and measuring a key strategic decision making process.Journal of Management. 2000;26:1055-1085.
73. Corporate ventures into industrial markets: Dynamics of aggressive entry.Journal of Business Venturing. 1987;2:29-39.
74. A semiotic contribution to libel action law.International Journal for the Semiotics of Law. 1998;11:49-56.
75. From entrepreneurial orientation to "family orientation": Generational differences in the management of family businesses Frontiers of entrepreneurship research: Proceedings of the 23rd annual Entrepreneurship Research Conference. Babson Park, MA: Babson College; 2003:309-321.
76. Founding family controlled firms: Performance, risk, and value.Journal of Small Business Management. 2001;39:31-49.
77. Validity of annual report assertions about innovativeness: An empirical investigation.Journal of Business Research. 2001;53:151-161.
78. Organizational strategy, structure, and process. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978:.
79. The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms.Management Science. 1983;29:770-791.
80. Managing for the long run: Lessons in competitive advantage from great family businesses. Boston: Harvard Business School Press; 2005:.
81. Are more resources always better for growth? Resource stickiness in market and product expansion.Strategic Management Journal. 2004;25:1179-1197.
82. Inherited wealth, corporate control, and economic growth: The Canadian disease Concentrated corporate ownership. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2000:319-369.
83. Agency problems in large family business groups.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2003;27:367-382.
84. Corporate entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial development inside organizations. Dallas, TX: Harcourt Publishers; 2002:.
85. The concept of entrepreneurial intensity: Implications for company performance.Journal of Business Research. 1996;36:5-13.
86. Computerized content analysis in management research: A demonstration of advantages & limitations.Journal of Management. 1994;20:903-931.
87. Entrepreneurial orientation, risk taking, and performance in family firms.Family Business Review. 2007;20:33-58.
88. An evolutionary theory of economic theory and capabilities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1982:.
89. The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2002:.
90. The influence of ownership on performance: An empirical study.Strategic Management Journal. 1991;12:321-326.
91. The theory of the growth of the firm. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1959:.
92. Industry mindsets: Exploring the cultures of two macro-organizational settings.Organizational Science. 1994;5:384-402.
93. Industry categories and the politics of the comparable firm in CEO compensation.Administrative Science Quarterly. 1999;44:112-144.
94. Rethinking validity and reliability in content analysis.Journal of Applied Communication Research. 1999;27:258-284.
95. Structured conflict and consensus outcomes in group decision making.Journal of Management. 1995;21:691-710.
96. The synonym finder. Emmaus, PA: Rodale Press; 1978:.
97. Publishing from a reviewer's perspective Publishing in the organizational sciences. 1995). Publishing from a reviewer's perspective. In L. L. Cummings & P. J. Frost (Eds.), Publishing in the organizational sciences (2nd ed., pp. 151-163). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1995:151-163.
98. Toward a theory of agency and altruism in family firms.Journal of Business Venturing. 2003;18:473-490.
99. Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. New York: Harper & Brothers; 1942:.
100. Myths and realities: Family busnesses' contribution to the U.S. economy.Family Business Review. 1996;9:107-123.
101. Strategic management of family business: Past research and future challenges.Family Business Review. 1997;10:1-35.
102. Organizational performance referents: An empirical examination of their content and influences.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 2003;90:209-224.
103. The application of DICTION to content analysis research in strategic management.Organizational Research Methods. 2008;11:727-752.
104. Research on configurations: Past accomplishments and future challenges.Journal of Management. 2008;34:1053-1079.
105. The relationship between overconfidence and the introduction of risky products: Evidence from a field study.Academy of Management Journal. 2003;46:139-149.
106. Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management and wealth creation in family firms.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2003;27:339-358.
107. King of the hill: Dethroning the industry leader.Academy of Management Executive. 2001;15:59-70.
108. The art of war (J. Clavell, Ed.). New York: Dell; 1983:.
109. Bivalent attributes of the family firm.Family Business Review. 1996;9:199-208.
110. Strategic orientation of business enterprises: The construct, dimensionality, and measurement.Management Science. 1989;35:942-962.
111. Basic content analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1990:.
112. The development of family companies: Management and ownership imperatives.Family Business Review. 2001;14:369-385.
113. Entrepreneuial orientation and small business performance: A configurational approach.Journal of Business Venturing. 2005;20:71-91.
114. Entrepreneurial risk taking in family firms.Family Business Review. 2005;18:23-40.
115. Entrepreneurship in family vs. non-family firms: A resource based analysis of the effect of organizational culture.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2004;28:363-381.