Family firm resource management: Commentary and extensions

Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 313-319

  Kellermanns, Franz W ^a  

^a MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 27844597866     PISSN: 10422587     EISSN: 15406520     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00085.x     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. Alvarez, S.A. & Barney, J.B. (2004). Organizing rent generation and appropriation: Toward a theory of the entrepreneurial firm. Journal of Business Venturing, 19, 621-635.
2. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 77(1), 99-120.
3. Baron, R.A. (1998). Cognitive mechanisms in entrepreneurship: Why and when entrepreneurs think differently than other persons. Journal of Business Venturing, 13, 275-294.
4. Chrisman, J.J., Chua, J.H., & Steier, L.P. (2002). The influence of national culture and family involvement on entrepreneurial perceptions and performance at the state level. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26(4), 113-130.
5. Chua, J.H., Chrisman, J.J., & Sharma, P. (1999). Defining the family business by behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(4), 19-39.
6. Cyert, R.M. & March, J.G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm (2nd. ed.). Maiden, MA: Blackwell Publishers Inc.
7. Dierickx, I. & Cool, K. (1989). Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science, 35(12), 1504-1514.
8. Gallo, M.A. & Sveen, J. (1991). Internationalizing the family business: Facilitating and restraining factors. Family Business Review, 4(2), 181-190.
9. Gersick, K.E., Davis, J.A., Hampton, M.M., & Lansberg, I. (1997). Generation to generation: Life cycles of the family business. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
10. Habbershon, T.G. & Williams, M. (1999). A resource-based framework for assessing the strategic advantage of family firms. Family Business Review, 12, 1-25.
11. Habbershon, T.G., Williams, M., & MacMillan, I.C. (2003). A unified systems perspective of family firm performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 451-465.
12. Harvey, M. & Evans, R.E. (1994). Family business and multiple levels of conflict. Family Business Review, 7(4), 331-348.
13. Hofstede, G. (2001). Cultures consequences: Comparing values, behavior, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
14. Kellermanns, F.W. & Eddleston, K. (2004). Feuding families: When conflict does a family firm good. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(3), 209-228.
15. Kellermanns, F.W. & Floyd, S.W. (2005). Strategic consensus and constructive confrontation: Unifying forces in the resource accumulation process. In S.W. Floyd, J. Ross, C. Jacobs, & F.W. Kellermanns (Eds), Innovating strategy process, 149-162, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
16. Kelly, L.M., Athanassiou, N., & Grillenden, W.F. (2000). Founder cenlralily and strategic behavior in the family-owned firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(2), 27-42.
17. Kets de Vries, M.F.R. (1993). The dynamics of family controlled firms: The good and Ihe bad news. Organizational Dynamics, 21(3), 59-71.
18. King, A.W. & Zeilhaml, C.P. (2001). Competencies and firm performance: Examining the causal ambiguity paradox. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 75-99.
19. Makadok, R. (2001). Toward a synthesis of the resource-based and dynamic-capability view of rent creation. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 387-401.
20. Post, J.E. (1993). The greening of the Boston Park Plaza Hotel. Family Business Review, 6(2), 131-148.
21. Priem, R.L. & Butler, J.E. (2001). Is the resource-based view a useful perspective for strategic management research? Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 22-40.
22. Reed, R. & DeFillippi, R. (1990). Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and sustainable competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 15, 88-102.
23. Schulze, W.S., Lubatkin, M.H., & Dino, R.N. (2003). Exploring the agency consequences of ownership dispersion among inside directors at family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 46(2), 179-194.
24. Sharma, P. & Chrisman, J.J. (1999). Toward a reconciliation of the definitional issues in the field of corporate entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(3), 11-27.
25. Sharma, P., Chrisman, J.J., & Chua, J.H. (2003). Predictors of satisfaction with the succession process in family firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 667-687.
26. Sharma, P. & Manikutty, S. (2005). Strategic divestment in family firms: Role of family structure and community culture. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(3), 293-311.
27. Shepherd, D.A. & Zacharakis, A. (2000). Structuring family business succession: An analysis of the future leader's decision making. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 24(4), 25-39.
28. Sirmon, D.G. & Hitt, M.A. (2003). Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management, and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(4), 339-358.
29. Tagiuri, R. & Davis, J.A. (1992). On the goals of successful family companies. Family Business Review, 5(1), 43-62.
30. Todd, E. (1985). The explanation of ideology, family structures, and social systems. Oxford, U.K.: Basil Blackwell.
31. Veiga, J.F., Floyd, S., & Dechant, K. (2001). Towards modeling the effects of national culture on IT implementation and acceptance. Journal of Information Technology, 26(3), 3-12.