Effects of menu structure and touch screen scrolling style on the variability of glance durations during in-vehicle visual search tasks

Ergonomics

Volumn 54, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 716-732

  Kujala, Tuomo ^a   Saariluoma, Pertti ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

Author keywords

Display; Distraction; In vehicle information system; Interrupted visual search; Resumability; Visual sampling strategy

Indexed keywords

DISPLAY; DISTRACTION; IN-VEHICLE INFORMATION SYSTEM; RESUMABILITY; VISUAL SAMPLING STRATEGY; VISUAL SEARCH;

AUTOMOBILE DRIVERS; DISPLAY DEVICES; RESEARCH; USER INTERFACES;

VEHICLES;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CAR DRIVING; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PHYSIOLOGY;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; AUTOMOBILE DRIVING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA DISPLAY; FEMALE; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; HUMANS; MALE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80051725911     PISSN: 00140139     EISSN: 13665847     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2011.592601     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Ahn, J.-W. and Lleras, A., 2007. Spatial working memory loads can reduce search efficiency but not the rates of rapid resumption in interrupted visual search tasks. Journal of Vision, 7 (9), article 685.
2. Bayly, M., Young, K.L., and Regan, M.A., 2008. Sources of distraction inside the vehicle and their effects on driving performance. In: M.A. Regan, J.D. Lee, and K.L. Young, eds. Driver distraction: Theory, effects, and mitigation. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 191-214.
3. Brumby, D.P., Salvucci, D.D., and Howes, A., 2009. Focus on driving: how cognitive constraints shape the adaptation of strategy when dialing while driving. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI'09. New York: ACM Press, 1629-1638.
4. Collet, C., Guillot, A., and Petit, C., 2010. Phoning while driving. I: a review of epidemiological, psychological, behavioural and physiological studies. Ergonomics, 53, 589-601.
5. Cowan, N., 2005. Working memory capacity. New York: Psychology Press.
6. Drews, F.A., et al., 2009. Text messaging during simulated driving [online]. Human Factors, available from: http://hfs.sagepub.com/content/early/2009/12/16/0018720809353319 [Accessed 9 February 2011].
7. Enns, J.T. and Lleras, A., 2008. What's next? New evidence for prediction in human vision. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12 (9), 327-333.
8. Foulsham, T. and Underwood, G., 2009. Does conspicuity enhance distraction? Saliency and eye landing position when searching for objects. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1088-1098.
9. Friedman, A., 1979. Framing pictures: the role of knowledge in automatized encoding and memory for gist. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 316-355.
10. Goldberg, J.H. and Kotval, X.P., 1999. Computer interface evaluation using eye movements: methods and constructs. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 24, 631-645.
11. Green, P., 1999. Visual and task demands of driver information systems. Report No. UMTRIl98-16. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute.
12. Hoffman, J.D., et al., 2005. Visual sampling of in-vehicle text messages: effects of number of lines, page presentation, and message control. Transportation Research Record, 1937, 22-30.
13. Horrey, W.J. and Wickens, C.D., 2007. In-vehicle glance duration: distributions, tails, and model of crash risk. Transportation Research Record, 2018, 22-28.
14. International Organization for Standardization, 2007. ISO 16673. Road vehicles -Ergonomic aspects of transport information and control systems - occlusion method to assess visual demand due to the use of in-vehicle systems.
15. Jahn, G., et al., 2005. Peripheral detection as a workload measure in driving: effects of traffic complexity and route guidance system use in a driving study. Transportation Research Part F, 8, 255-275.
16. Klauer, S.G., et al., 2006. The Impact of driver inattention on near-crash/crash risk: An analysis using the 100-car naturalistic driving study data. DOT HS Rep. 810 594. Washington DC: US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
17. Kujala, T., 2009. Occlusion technique - valid metrics for testing visual distraction? In: Proceedings of the European conference on cognitive ergonomics 2009. Otaniemi, FI: VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, 341-348.
18. Lee, J.D., Regan, M.A., and Young, K.L., 2008. What drives distraction? Distraction as a breakdown of multilevel control. In: M.A. Regan, J.D. Lee, and K.L. Young, eds. Driver distraction: Theory, effects, and mitigation. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 41-56.
19. Lenneman, J.K. and Backs, R.W., 2009. Cardiac autonomic control during simulated driving with a concurrent verbal working memory task. Human Factors, 51, 404-418.
20. Lleras, A., Rensink, R.A., and Enns, J.T., 2005. Rapid resumption of interrupted visual search: new insights on the interaction between vision and memory. Psychological Science, 16 (9), 684-688.
21. Logan, G.D., 1988. Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492-527.
22. Monk, C.A. and Kidd, D.G., 2007. R we fooling ourselves: does the occlusion technique shortchange R estimates? In: Proceedings of the fourth international driving symposiumon human factors in driver assessment, training and vehicle design. Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa PublicPolicy Center, 2-8.
23. Moran, T.P., 1981. Guest editor's introduction: an applied psychology of the user. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 13 (1), 1-11.
24. Oulasvirta, A. and Saariluoma, P., 2004. Long-term working memory and interrupting messages in human-computer interaction. Behaviour and Information Technology, 23, 53-64.
25. Oulasvirta, A. and Saariluoma, P., 2006. Surviving task interruptions: investigating the implications of long-term working memory theory. International Journal of Human- Computer Studies, 64 (10), 941-961.
26. Rabbitt, P.M.A., 1984. The control of attention in visual search. In: R. Parasuraman and D.R. Davies, eds. Varieties of attention. Orlando, FL: Academic Press, 273-291.
27. Rasmussen, J., 1990. The role of error in organizing behaviour. Ergonomics, 33, 1185-1199.
28. Ratwani, R.M. and Trafton, J.G., 2008. Spatial memory guides task resumption. Visual Cognition, 16 (8), 1001-1010.
29. Ratwani, R.J., et al., 2007. Using peripheral processing and spatial memory to facilitate task resumption. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting Proceedings, 51, 244-248.
30. Recarte, M.A. and Nunes, L., 2002. Mental load and loss of control over speed in real driving. Towards a theory of attentional speed control. Transportation Research Part F, 5, 111-122.
31. Rockwell, T.H., 1988. Spare visual capacity in driving - revisited: new empirical results for an old idea. In: M.H. Freeman, C.M. Haslegrave, P. Smith, S.P. Taylor, and A.G. Gale, eds. Vision in vehicles II. Amsterdam, NED: Elsevier Science Publishers BV, 317-324.
32. Saariluoma, P. and Oulasvirta, A., 2010. User psychology: reassessing the boundaries of a discipline. Psychology, 1 (5), 317-328.
33. Schneider, W. and Shiffrin, R.M., 1977. Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84 (1), 1-66.
34. Shen, Y.J. and Jiang, Y.V., 2006. Interrupted visual searches reveal volatile search memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32 (5), 1208-1220.
35. Shiffrin, R.M. and Schneider, W., 1977. Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84 (2), 127-190.
36. Society of Automotive Engineers, 2000. SAE J2396. Surface vehicle recommended practice, definitions and experimental measures related to the specification of driver visual behavior using video based techniques. Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers.
37. Stevens, A., Burnett, G., and Horberry, T., 2010. A reference level for assessing the acceptable visual demand of in-vehicle information systems. Behavior and Information Technology, 29 (5), 527-540.
38. Underwood, G. and Everatt, J., 1992. The role of eye movements in reading: some limitations of the eye-mind assumption. In: E. Chekaluk and K.R. Llewellyn, eds. The role of eye movements in perception. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 111-169.
39. Underwood, G., Foulsham, T., and Humphrey, K., 2009. Saliency and scan patterns in the inspection of real-world scenes: eye movements during encoding and recognition. Visual Cognition, 17, 812-834.
40. Victor, T.W., Engström, J., and Harbluk, J.L., 2008. Distraction assessment methods based on visual behavior and event detection. In: M.A. Regan, J.D. Lee, and K.L. Young, eds. Driver distraction: Theory, effects, and mitigation. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 135-165.
41. Victor, T.W., Harbluk, J.L., and Engström, J.A., 2005. Sensitivity of eye-movement measures to in-vehicle task difficulty. Transportation Research Part F, 8, 167-190.
42. Wang, Y., et al., 2010. The validity of driving simulation for assessing differences between in-vehicle informational interfaces: a comparison with field testing. Ergonomics, 53, 404-420.
43. Wierwille, W.W., 1993. An initial model of visual sampling of in-car displays and controls. In: A.G. Gale, I.D. Brown, C.M. Haslegrave, H.W. Kruysse, and S.P. Taylor, eds. Vision in vehicles IV. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 271-279.
44. Wierwille, W.W., et al., 1988. Visual attentional demand of an in-car navigation display system. In: A.G. Gale, I.D. Brown, C.M. Haslegrave, H.W. Kruysse, and S.P. Taylor, eds. Vision in vehicles II. Amsterdam, NL: North-Holland Press, 307-316.
45. Wikman, A.S., Nieminen, T., and Summala, H., 1998. Driving experience and time-sharing during in-car tasks on roads of different width. Ergonomics, 41, 358-372.
46. Wikman, A.S. and Summala, H., 2005. Aging and time-sharing in highway driving. Optometry and Vision Science, 82, 716-723.
47. Zwahlen, H.T., Adams, C.C., and DeBald, D.P., 1988. Safety aspects of CRT touch panel controls in automobiles. In: M.H. Freeman, C.M. Haslegrave, P. Smith, S.P. Taylor, and A.G. Gale, eds. Vision in vehicles II. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers BV, 335-344.