On reconstruction of task context after interruption

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn 1, Issue , 2010, Pages 89-92

  Salvucci, Dario D ^a  

^a Drexel University   (United States)

Author keywords

attention; interruption; multitasking; problem state

Indexed keywords

ATTENTION; COMPLEX RELATIONSHIPS; COMPUTATIONAL FRAMEWORK; COMPUTATIONAL MODEL; MOTOR PROCESS; RE-ENCODING; RECONSTRUCTION PROCESS; TASK DOMAIN;

HUMAN ENGINEERING; MULTITASKING;

REPAIR;

EID: 77953975972     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1753326.1753341     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Adamczyk, P. D., & Bailey, B. P. (2004). If not now, when? The effects of interruptions at different moments within task execution. Proc. CHI 2004, 271-278.
2. Altmann, E.M., & Trafton, J.G. (2002). Memory for goals: An activation-based model. Cognitive Science, 26, 39-83.
3. Anderson, J. R. (2007). How can the human mind occur in the physical universe? New York: Oxford University Press.
4. Bailey, B. P., & Iqbal, S. T. (2008). Understanding changes in mental workload during execution of goal-directed tasks and its application for interruption management. ACM Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, 14, 1-28.
5. Borst, J. P., & Taatgen, N. A. (2007). The costs of multitasking in threaded cognition. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Cognitive Modelling, 133-138.
6. Cutrell, E. B., Czerwinski, M., & Horvitz, E. (2000). Effects of instant messaging interruptions on computing tasks. Proc. CHI 2000, Extended Abstracts, 99-100.
7. Czerwinski, M., Cutrell, E., & Horvitz, E. (2000). Instant messaging: Effects of relevance and timing. People and Computers XIV: Proc. HCI 2000, 71-76.
8. Dismukes, R. K., & Nowinski, J. (2007). Prospective memory, concurrent task management, and pilot error. In A. Kramer, D. Wiegmann, & A. Kirlik (Eds.) Attention: From Theory to Practice. New York: Oxford.
9. Hodgetts, H. M., & Jones, D. M. (2006). Interruption of the tower of London task: Support for a goal-activation approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 103-115.
10. Iqbal, S.T., & Bailey, B.P. (2005). Investigating the effectiveness of mental workload as a predictor of opportune moments for interruption. Proc. CHI 2005, 1489-1492.
11. Iqbal, S.T., et al. (2005). Towards an index of opportunity: Understanding changes in mental workload during task execution. Proc. CHI 2005, 311-320.
12. Mark, G., Gonzalez, V. M., & Harris, J. (2005). No task left behind? Examining the nature of fragmented work. Proc. CHI 2005, 321-330.
13. Monk, C. A., Boehm-Davis, D. A. & Trafton, J. G. (2004). Recovering from interruptions: Implications for driver distraction research. Human Factors, 46, 650-663.
14. Monk, C. A., Trafton, J. G., & Boehm-Davis, D. A. (2008). The effect of interruption duration and demand on resuming suspended goals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 14, 299-313.
15. Salvucci, D. D., & Taatgen, N. A. (2008). Threaded cognition: An integrated theory of concurrent multitasking. Psychological Review, 115, 101-130.
16. Salvucci, D. D., & Taatgen, N. A. (2010). The Multitasking Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
17. Salvucci, D. D., Taatgen, N. A., & Borst, J. P. (2009). Toward a unified theory of the multitasking continuum: From concurrent performance to task switching, interruption, and resumption. Proc. CHI 2009, 1819-1828.
18. Trafton, J. G., Altmann, E. M., Brock, D. P., & Mintz, F. E. (2003). Preparing to resume an interrupted task: Effects of prospective goal encoding and retrospective rehearsal. IJHCS, 58, 583-603.