Joint estimation using revealed and stated preference data: An application using a national forest

Journal of Forest Economics

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 249-266

  Simões, Paula ^a,b   Barata, Eduardo ^b   Cruz, Luís ^b  

^a POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE OF LEIRIA   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COIMBRA   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Contingent behaviour; Count data; Forest recreation demand; Joint estimation; Quality change; Travel cost method

Indexed keywords

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DEFORESTATION; DETERIORATION;

CONTINGENT BEHAVIOUR; COUNT DATUM; FOREST RECREATION DEMAND; JOINT ESTIMATION; QUALITY CHANGE; TRAVEL COST METHOD;

COST ESTIMATING;

DATA SET; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ESTIMATION METHOD; FOREST MANAGEMENT; PREFERENCE BEHAVIOR; RECREATIONAL FACILITY; STRATEGIC APPROACH; TRAVEL DEMAND;

COSTS; DATA PROCESSING; DEFORESTATION; FORESTS;

EID: 84883233620     PISSN: 11046899     EISSN: 16181530     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfe.2013.03.001     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Alberini A., Zanatta V., Rosato P. Combining actual and contingent behaviour to estimate the value of sports fishing in the Lagoon of Venice. Ecological Economics 2007, 61(2-3):530-541.
2. Amoako-Tuffour J., Martínez-Espiñeira R. Leisure and the net opportunity cost of travel time in recreation demand analysis: an application to Gros Morne National Park. Journal of Applied Economics 2012, 15(1):25-49.
3. Aparício A. Incêndios Rurais/Florestais na Rede Nacional de Áreas Protegidas 2010 2011, Instituto de Conservação da Natureza e da Biodiversidade, Lisboa.
4. Arrow K., Solow R., Portney P., Leamer E., Radner R., Schuman W. Report of the national oceanic and atmospheric administration panel on contingent valuation. Federal Register 1993, 58(10):4602-4614.
5. Azevedo C., Herriges J., Kling C. Combining revealed and stated preferences: consistency tests and their interpretations. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 2003, 85(3):525-537.
6. Beal D. A travel cost analysis of the value of Carnarvon Gorge National Park for recreational use. Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics 1995, 63(2):292-303.
7. Bergstrom J., Dorfman J., Loomis J. Estuary management and recreational fishing benefits. Coastal Management 2004, 32(4):417-432.
8. Betz C., Bergstrom J., Bowker J. A contingent trip model for estimating rail-trail demand. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 2003, 46(1):79-96.
9. Bhat M. Application of non-market valuation to the Florida keys marine reserve management. Journal of Environmental Management 2003, 67(4):315-325.
10. Bockstael N., Strand I. The effect of common sources of regression error on benefit estimates. Land Economics 1987, 63(1):11-20.
11. Bowker J., English D., Donovan J. Toward a value for guided rafting on Southern Rivers. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 1996, 28(2):423-432.
12. Cameron A., Trivedi P. Microeconometrics Using Stata 2010, Stata Press, College Station, TX.
13. Cameron T. Combining contingent valuation and travel cost data for the valuation of nonmarket goods. Land Economics 1992, 68(3):302-317.
14. Chase L., Lee D., Schulze W., Anderson D. Ecotourism demand and differential pricing of National Park Access in Costa Rica. Land Economics 1998, 74(4):466-482.
15. Christie M., Hanley N., Hynes S. Valuing enhancements to forest recreation using choice experiment and behaviour methods. Journal of Forest Economics 2007, 13(2-3):75-102.
16. Egan K., Herriges J. Multivariate count data regression models with individual panel data from an on-site sample. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2006, 52(2):567-581.
17. Englin J., Cameron T. Augmenting travel cost models with contingent behavior data. Poisson regression analysis with individual panel data. Environmental and Resource Economics 1996, 7(2):133-147.
18. Englin J., Loomis J., González-Cabán A. The dynamic path of recreational values following a forest fire: a comparative analysis of states in the Intermountain West. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 2001, 31(10):1837-1844.
19. Englin J., Shonkwiler J. Estimating social welfare using count data models: an application to long-run recreation demand under conditions of endogenous stratification and truncation. The Review of Economics and Statistics 1995, 77(1):104-112.
20. Fleming C., Cook A. The recreational value of Lake McKenzie Island: an application of the travel cost method. Tourism Management 2008, 29(6):1197-1205.
21. Gintis H. Beyond Homo economicus: evidence from experimental economics. Ecological Economics 2000, 35(3):311-322.
22. González J., Loomis J., González-Caban A. A joint estimation method to combine dichotomous choice CVM models with count data models corrected for truncation and endogenous stratification. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 2008, 40(2):681-695.
23. Grijalva T., Berrens R., Bohara A., Shaw W. Testing the validity of contingent behavior trip responses. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 2002, 84(2):401-414.
24. Grossmann M. Impacts of boating trip limitations on the recreational value of the Spreewald wetland: a pooled revealed/contingent behaviour application of the travel cost method. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 2011, 54(2):211-226.
25. Hanley N. Valuing non-market goods using contingent valuation. Journal of Economic Surveys 1989, 3(3):235-252.
26. Hanley N., Bell D., Alvarez-Farizo B. Valuing the benefits of coastal water quality improvements using contingent and real behaviour. Environmental and Resource Economics 2003, 24(3):273-285.
27. Haspel A., Johnson F. Multiple destination trip bias in recreation benefit estimation. Land Economics 1982, 58(3):364-372.
28. Hausman J., Hall B., Griliches Z. Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents - R&D relationship. Econometrica 1984, 52(4):909-938.
29. Heberling M., Templeton J. Estimating the economic value of national parks with count data models using on-site. Secondary data: the case of the Great Sand Dunes National Park and preserve. Environmental Management 2009, 43(4):619-627.
30. Hellerstein D., Mendelsohn R. A theoretical foundation for count data models. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 1993, 75(3):604-611.
31. Hesseln H., Loomis J., González-Cabán A. Comparing the economic effects of fire on hiking demand in Montana and Colorado. Journal of Forest Economics 2004, 10(1):21-35.
32. Huang J.-C., Haab T., Whitehead J. Willingness to pay for quality improvements: should revealed and stated preference data be combined?. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 1997, 34(3):240-255.
33. Jeon Y., Herriges J. Convergent validity of contingent behavior responses in models of recreation demand. Environmental and Resource Economics 2010, 45(2):223-250.
34. Landry C., Liu H. A semi-parametric estimator for revealed and stated preference data-An application to recreational beach visitation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2009, 57(2):205-218.
35. Layman R., Boyce J., Criddle K. Economic valuation of the Chinook Salmon Sport Fishery of the Gulkana River, Alaska, under current and alternate management plans. Land Economics 1996, 72(1):113-128.
36. Lienhoop N., Ansmann T. Valuing water level changes in reservoirs using two stated preference approaches: an exploration of validity. Ecological Economics 2011, 70(7):1250-1258.
37. Loomis J. An investigation into the reliability of intended visitation behavior. Environmental and Resource Economics 1993, 3(1):183-191.
38. Loomis J. Panel estimators to combine revealed and stated preference dichotomous choice data. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 1997, 22(2):233-245.
39. Loomis J., Yorizane S., Larson D. Testing significance of multi-destination and multi-purposetrip effects in a travel cost method demand model for whale watching trips. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 2000, 29(2):183-191.
40. Martínez-Espiñeira R., Amoako-Tuffour J. Recreation demand analysis under truncation, overdispersion and endogenous stratification: an application to Gros Morne National Park. Journal of Environmental Management 2008, 88(4):1320-1332.
41. Martínez-Espiñeira R., Amoako-Tuffour J. Multi-destination and multi-purpose trip effects in the analysis of the demand for trips to a remote recreational site. Environmental Management 2009, 43(6):1146-1161.
42. Mendes I., Proença I. Measuring the social recreation per-day net benefit of the wildlife amenities of a National Park: a count-data travel-cost approach. Environmental Management 2011, 48(5):920-932.
43. Mogas J., Riera P., Bennett J. A comparison of contingent valuation and choice modelling with second-order interactions. Journal of Forest Economics 2006, 12(1):5-30.
44. Nakatani T., Sato K. Truncation and endogenous stratification in various count data models for recreation demand analysis. Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics 2010, 2(1):293-303.
45. Ovaskainen V., Neuvonen M., Pouta E. Modelling recreation demand with respondent-reported driving cost and stated cost of travel time: a Finnish case. Journal of Forest Economics 2012, 18(4):303-317.
46. Palmquist R., Phaneuf D., Smith V. Short run constraints and the increasing marginal value of time in recreation. Environmental and Resource Economics 2010, 46(1):19-41.
47. Parsons G., Kang A., Leggett C., Boyle K. Valuing beach closures on the Padre Island National Seashore. Marine Resource Economics 2009, 24(2):213-235.
48. Rausch M., Boxall P., Verbyla A. The development of fire-induced damage functions for forest recreation activity in Alberta, Canada. International Journal of Wildland Fire 2010, 19(1):63-74.
49. Ribaudo M., Epp D. The importance of sample discrimination in using travel cost method to estimate the benefits of improved water quality. Land Economics 1984, 60(1):398-403.
50. Riera P., Signorello G., Thiene M., Mahieu P.-A., Navrud S., Kaval P., Rulleau B., Mavsar R., Madureira L., Meyerhoff J., Elsasser P., Notaro S., De Salvo M., Giergiczny M., Dragoi S. Non-market valuation of forest goods and services: good practice guidelines. Journal of Forest Economics 2012, 18(4):259-270.
51. Rosenberger R., Loomis J. The value of ranch open space to tourists: combining observed and contingent behavior data. Growth and Change 1999, 30(3):366-383.
52. Shaw D. On-site samples' regression, problems of non-negative integers, truncation, and endogenous stratification. Journal of Econometrics 1988, 37(2):211-223.
53. Shrestha R., Seidl A., Moraes A. Value of recreational fishing in Brazilian Pantanal: a travel cost analysis using count data models. Ecological Economics 2002, 42(1-2):289-299.
54. Simões, P., Cruz, L., Barata, E., 2012. Non-market recreational value of a national forest: survey design and results. Discussion Paper 09-2012. GEMF, FEUC.
55. Smith V., Kaoru Y. Signals or noise? Explaining the variation in recreation benefit estimates. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 1990, 72(2):419-433.
56. Statacorp Stata Longitudinal-Data/Panel-Data Reference Manual 2009, Stata Corp LP, College Station, TX.
57. Vaux, H., Gardner, P., Mills, T., 1984. Methods for assessing the impact of fire on forest recreation. In: Station, P.S.F.R.E. (Ed.), United States Department of Agriculture, Berkeley.
58. Ward F. Economics of water allocation to instream uses in a fully appropriated River Basin: evidence from a New Mexico Wild River. Water Resources Research 1987, 23:381-392.
59. Ward F., Beal D. Valuing Nature With Travel Cost Models: A Manual 2000, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, Massachusetts, USA.
60. Whitehead J., Haab T., Huang J.-C. Measuring recreation benefits of quality improvements with revealed and stated behavior data. Resource and Energy Economics 2000, 22(4):339-354.
61. Whitehead J., Pattanayak S., Houtven G., Gelso B. Combining revealed and stated preference data to estimate the nonmarket value of ecological services: an assessement of the state of the science. Journal of Economic Surveys 2008, 22(5):872-908.
62. Whitehead J., Phaneuf D., Dumas C., Herstine J., Hill J., Buerger B. Convergent validity of revealed and stated recreation behavior with quality change: a comparison of multiple and single site demands. Environmental and Resource Economics 2010, 45(1):91-112.
63. Yeh C.-Y, Haab T., Sohngen B. Modeling multiple-objective recreation trips with choices over trip duration and alternative sites. Environmental and Resource Economics 2006, 34(2):189-218.
64. Zandersen, M., 2005. Valuing forest recreation in europe: time and spatial considerations. Doctor Ph.D. Thesis, Hamburg University and International Max Planck Research School on Earth System Modelling.
65. Zandersen M., Tol R. A meta-analysis of forest recreational values in Europe. Journal of Forest Economics 2009, 15(1-2):109-130.