Impacts of boating trip limitations on the recreational value of the spreewald wetland: A pooled revealed/contingent behaviour application of the travel cost method

Journal of Environmental Planning and Management

Volumn 54, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 211-226

  Grossmann, Malte ^a  

^a TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Count data model; Recreational boating; Spree River Basin; Water based recreation; Wetlands; Zonal travel cost method

Indexed keywords

BOATING; CONTINGENT VALUATION; ECOTOURISM; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; RECREATIONAL MANAGEMENT; TOURISM MANAGEMENT; TRAVEL DEMAND; WATER AVAILABILITY; WETLAND MANAGEMENT;

BRANDENBURG; GERMANY; SPREE RIVER; SPREEWALD;

EID: 78951477706     PISSN: 09640568     EISSN: 13600559     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2010.505827     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Cooper, J. and Loomis, J., 1993. Testing whether waterfowl hunting benefits increase with greater water deliveries to wetlands. Environmental and resource economics, 3, 545-561.
2. Cordell, K. and Bergstrom, J., 1993. Comparison of recreation use values among alternative reservoir level management scenarios. Water resources research, 29 (2), 247-258.
3. Creel, M. and Loomis, J., 1992. Recreation value of water to wetlands in the San Joaquim Valley; linked multinominal logit and count data trip frequency models. Water resources research, 28 (10), 2597-2606.
4. Dietrich, O., Redetzky, M., and Schwarzel, K., 2007. Wetlands with controlled drainage and subirrigation systems - modelling of the water balance. Hydrological processes, 21 (14), 1814-1828.
5. Eiswerth, M., et al., 2000. The value of water levels in water based recreation: a pooled revealed preference/contingent behaviour model. Water resources research 36 (4), 1079-1086.
6. Englin, J. and Cameron, T.A., 1996. Augmenting travel cost models with contingent behaviour data. Environmental and resource economics, 7, 133-147.
7. English, D. and Bowker, J., 1996. Sensitivity of whitewater rafting consumer surplus estimates to pecuniary travel cost specifications. Journal of environmental management, 47, 79-91.
8. Fadali, E. and Shaw, D., 1998. Can recreation values for a lake constitute a market for banked agricultural water? Contemporary economic policy, 16, 433-441.
9. Haab, T. and McConnell, K., 2002. Valuing environmental and natural resources. The econometrics of non-market valuation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
10. Hellerstein, D., 1991. Using count data models in travel cost analysis with aggregate data. American journal of agricultural economics, 73, 861-866.
11. Hellerstein, D., 1993. Intertemporal data and travel cost analysis. Environmental and resource economics, 3, 193-207.
12. Hellerstein, D., 1995. Welfare estimation using aggregate and individual observation models: a comparison using Monte-Carlo techniques. American journal of agricultural economics, 77, 620-630.
13. Hellerstein, D. and Mendelsohn, R., 1993. A theoretical foundation for count data models. American journal of agricultural economics, 75, 604-611.
14. Hynes, S. and Hanley, N., 2006. Preservation versus development on Irish rivers: whitewater kayaking and hydro-power in Ireland. Land use policy, 23, 170-180.
15. Hynes, S., Hanley, N., and O'Donoghue, C., 2009. Alternative treatments of the cost of time in recreational demand models: an application to whitewater kayaking in Ireland. Journal of environmental management, 90 (2), 1014-1021.
16. Koch, H., et al., 2006. Adaptation strategies to global change for water resources management in the Spree River Catchment, Germany. International journal of river basin management, 4(4),273-281.
17. Lienhoop, N. and Messner, F., 2009. The economic value of allocating water to post-mining lakes in East Germany. Water resource management, 23 (5), 965-980.
18. Lovett, A., Brainard, J., and Bateman, I., 1997. Improving benefit transfer functions: a GIS approach. Journal of environmental management, 51, 373-389.
19. Moeltner, K., 2003. Addressing aggregation bias in zonal recreation models. Journal of environmental economics and management, 45 (1), 128-144.
20. Statistisches Bundesamt Deutschland - StaBu, 2003. Statistik Regional 2003. Wiesbaden.
21. Statistisches Bundesamt Deutschland - StaBu, 2003. Statistik Lokal 2003. Wiesbaden.
22. Ward, F., 1987. Economics of water allocation to in-stream uses in a fully appropriated river basin: evidence from a New Mexico wild river. Water resources research, 23, 381-392.
23. Ward, F., Roach, B., and Henderson, J., 1996. The economic value of water in recreation: evidence from the California drought. Water resources research, 32 (4), 1075-1081.
24. Whitehead, J., et al., 2008. Combining revealed and stated preference data to estimate the nonmarket value of ecological services: an assessment of the state of the science. Journal of economic surveys, 22 (5), 872-908.
25. Willis, K. and Garrod, G., 1991. Valuing open access recreation on inland waterways: on-site recreation surveys and selection effects. Regional studies, 25 (6), 511-524.
26. Willis, K. and Garrod, G., 1999. Angling and recreation values of low-flow alleviation in rivers. Journal of environmental management, 57, 71-83.