Augmenting travel cost models with contingent behavior data Poisson Regression Analyses with Individual Panel Data

Environmental and Resource Economics

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 133-147

  Englin, Jeffrey ^a   Cameron, Trudy Ann ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

Author keywords

Contingent behavior surveys; Fixed effects models; Nonmarket valuation; Panel data methods; Poisson regression; Recreational demand modelling; Travel cost method

Indexed keywords

METHODOLOGICAL EVALUATION; MODELLING APPROACH; RECREATION DEMAND; TRAVEL COST MODEL;

EID: 0029729486     PISSN: 09246460     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF00699288     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Adamowicz, W., J. Louviere and M. Williams (1994), 'Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Methods for Valuing Environmental Amenities', Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 26(3), 215-234.
2. Allen, P. G., T. H. Stevens and S. A. Barrett (1981), 'The Effects of Variable Omission in the Travel Cost Technique', Land Economics 57(2), 173-180.
3. Bockstael, N., W. M. Hanemann and I. Strand (1984), Measuring the Benefits of Water Quality Improvements Using Recreational Demand Models. Volume II of Benefit Analysis Using Indirect or Imputed Market Methods, EPA Contract No. CR-811043-01-0 (1984).
4. Cameron, T. A. (1992), 'Combining Contingent Valuation and Travel Cost Data for the Valuation of Nonmarket Goods', Land Economics 68(3), 302-317.
5. Caulkins, P. P., R. C. Bishop and N. W. Bouwes (1985), 'Omitted Cross-Price Variable Biases in the Linear Travel Cost Model: Correcting Common Misperceptions', Land Economics 61(2), 181-187.
6. Cummings, R., D. Brookshire and W. Schulze (1986), Valuing Environmental Goods: A State of the Arts Assessment of the Contingent Valuation Method, Rowman and Allanheld, Totowa, N.J.
7. Dickie, M., A. Fisher and S. Gerking (1987), 'Market Transactions and Hypothetical Demand: A Comparative Study', Journal of the American Statistical Association 82, 67-75.
8. Gourieroux, C., A. Monfort and A. Trognon (1984), 'Pseudo Maximum Likelihood Methods: Applications to Poisson Models', Econometrica 52(3), 701-720.
9. Hall, B., Z. Griliches and J. Hausman (1986), 'Patents and R&D: Is There a Lag?', International Economic Review 27(2), 265-284.
10. Hausman, J., B. Hall and Z. Griliches (1984), 'Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R&D Relationship', Econometrica 52(4), 909-938.
11. Hellerstein, D. (1991), 'Using Count Data Models in Travel Cost Analysis with Aggregate Data', American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73(3), 860-867.
12. Hellerstein, D. (1992), 'The Treatment of Nonparticipants in Travel Cost Analysis and Other Demand Models', Water Resources Research 28(8), 1999-2004.
13. Hellerstein, D. (1993), 'Intertemporal Data and Travel Cost Analysis', Environmental and Resource Economics 3(2), 193-207.
14. Kling, C. L. (1989), 'A Note on the Welfare Effects of Omitting Substitute Prices and Qualities from Travel Cost Models', Land Economics 65(3): 290-296.
15. McKean, J. R. and C. F. Revier (1990), 'Omitted Cross-Price Variable Biases in the Linear Travel Cost Model: Correcting Common Misperceptions: An Extension', Land Economics 66(4), 430-436.
16. Mitchell, R. and R. Carson (1989), Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.
17. Randall, A. (1994), 'A Difficulty with the Travel Cost Method', Land Economics 70(1), 88-96.
18. Wilman, E. A. and J. Perras (1989), 'The Substitute Price Variable in the Travel Cost Equation', Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 37(2), 249-261.