Short run constraints and the increasing marginal value of time in recreation

Environmental and Resource Economics

Volumn 46, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 19-41

  Palmquist, Raymond B ^a   Phaneuf, Daniel J ^a   Smith, V Kerry ^b,c,d  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c RESOURCES FOR THE FUTURE   (United States)

^d NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Choice margins; Local recreation outings; Opportunity cost of time; Time allocation

Indexed keywords

CHOICE MARGINS; HOUSEHOLD TIME ALLOCATION; LEISURE ACTIVITIES; LOCAL RECREATION OUTINGS; MARGINAL VALUE OF TIME; OPPORTUNITY COSTS; STATED PREFERENCES; TIME ALLOCATION;

ECONOMICS;

ECONOMETRICS; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; LABOR MARKET; RECREATIONAL ACTIVITY; TIME ALLOCATION;

EID: 77950689389     PISSN: 09246460     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10640-009-9331-3     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Becker GS (1965) A theory of the allocation of time. Econ J 75: 493-517.
2. Bockstael N, Strand I, Hanemann WM (1987) Time and the recreational demand model. Am J Agric Econ 69(2): 293-302.
3. Carson RT, Hanemann WM, Wegge T (1989) A nested logit model of recreation demand in Alaska. Working paper, University of California, San Diego.
4. Cesario FJ (1976) Value of time in recreation benefit studies. Land Econ 52: 32-41.
5. Chetty R, Szeidl A (2007) Consumption commitments and risk preferences. Q J Econ 122: 831-877.
6. DeSerpa A (1971) A theory of the economics of time. Econ J 81(324): 828-846.
7. Dillman DR (1978) Mail and telephone surveys: the total design method. Wiley, New York.
8. Feather PM, Shaw WD (1999) Estimating the cost of leisure time for recreation demand models. J Environ Econ Manag 38(1): 49-65.
9. Frazis H, Stewart J (2007) Where does time go? Concepts and measurement in the American time use survey. In: Berndt ER, Hulten CM(eds) Hard-to-measure goods and services: essays in memory of Zvi Griliches. University of Chicago Press for the National Bureau of Economic Research, Chicago.
10. Hall RE (2009) Reconciling cyclical movements in the marginal value of time and the marginal product of labor. J Polit Econ 117(2): 281-323.
11. Hamermesh DS (2005) Routine. In: Hamermesh DS, Pfann GA(eds) The economics of time use. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
12. Heckman J (1974) Shadow prices, market wages, and labor supply. Econometrica 42(4): 679-694.
13. Holbrook AL, Krosnick JA, Pfent A (2005) The causes and consequences of response rates in surveys by the news media and government contract survey research firms. Discussion paper.
14. Huber PJ (1967) The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under non-standard conditions. In: Proceedings of the fifth symposium on mathematical statistics and probability. University of California Press, Berkeley.
15. Johnson MB (1966) Travel time and the price of leisure. West Econ J 4: 135-145.
16. Kahneman D, Krueger AB, Schkade DA, Schwarz N, Stone AA (2004) A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: the day reconstruction method. Science 306: 1776-1780.
17. Keeter S, Miller C, Kohut A, Groves RM, Presser S (2000) Consequences of reducing nonresponse in a national telephone survey. Public Opin Q 64: 125-148.
18. Landefeld JS, McCulla SH (2000) Accounting for non-market household production within a national accounts framework. Rev Income Wealth 46(3): 289-307.
19. Larson DM, Shaikh SL (2001) Empirical specification requirements for two-constraint models of recreation choice. Am J Agric Econ 83(2): 428-440.
20. Lew DK, Larson DM (2005) Accounting for stochastic shadow values of time in discrete-choice recreation demand models. J Environ Econ Manag 50(2): 341-361.
21. McConnell KE, Strand I (1981) Measuring the cost of time in recreation demand analysis: an application to sportfishing. Am J Agric Econ 63: 153-156.
22. Nordhaus WD (2006) Principles of national accounting for non-market accounts. In: Jorgenson DW, Landefeld JS, Nordhaus WD(eds) A new architecture for the US national accounts. University of Chicago Press for National Bureau of Economic Research, Chicago.
23. Shaikh SL, Larson DM (2003) A two-constraint almost ideal demand model of recreation and donations. Rev Econ Stat 85(4): 953-961.
24. Smith VK, Desvousges W, McGivney M (1983) The opportunity cost of travel time in recreation demand models. Land Econ 59: 259-278.
25. Vereshchagina G (2007) Preference for risk in a dynamic model with consumption commitments. Unpublished paper, Department of Economics, Arizona State University.