Potential diagnostic role of the MRI-derived internal magnetic field gradient in calcaneus cancellous bone for evaluating postmenopausal osteoporosis at 3T

Bone

Volumn 57, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 155-163

  Rebuzzi, Mauro ^a,b   Vinicola, Vincenzo ^b   Taggi, Franco ^c   Sabatini, Umberto ^b   Wehrli, Felix W ^d   Capuani, Silvia ^a  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^b IRCCS FONDAZIONE SANTA LUCIA   (Italy)

^c ISTITUTO SUPERIORE DI SANITÀ   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cancellous bone; Internal magnetic field gradient; Magnetic susceptibility; Osteoporosis; T2; Water diffusion

Indexed keywords

WATER;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; BONE MARROW; CALCANEUS; CAVUM CALCANEUS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIFFUSION; DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; ELECTRON SPIN RESONANCE; FAT CONTENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERNAL MAGNETIC FIELD GRADIENT; MAGNETIC FIELD; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OSTEOPENIA; POSTMENOPAUSE OSTEOPOROSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY; SUBTALAR JOINT; TRABECULAR BONE; TUBER CALCANEUS; WATER DIFFUSION;

CANCELLOUS BONE; INTERNAL MAGNETIC FIELD GRADIENT; MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; OSTEOPOROSIS; T2*; WATER DIFFUSION;

AGED; CALCANEUS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOPOROSIS, POSTMENOPAUSAL;

EID: 84883224687     PISSN: 87563282     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2013.07.027     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. WHO Technical Report Series 921 Prevention and management of osteoporosis. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 2000, 921.
2. Kanis J.A. Diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk. Lancet 2002, 359:1929-1936.
3. Wehrli F.W., Hilaire L., Fernández-Seara M., Gomberg B.R., Song H.K., Zemel B., et al. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging in the calcaneus and femur of women with varying degrees of osteopenia and vertebral deformity status. J Bone Miner Res 2002, 17:2265-2273.
4. Schick F. Bone marrow NMR in vivo. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc 1996, 29:169-227.
5. Sheu Y., Cauley J.A. The role of bone marrow and visceral fat on bone metabolism. Curr Osteoporos Rep 2011, 9:67-75.
6. Chung H., Wehrli F.W., Williams J.L., Kugelmass S.D. Relationship between NMR transverse relaxation, trabecular bone architecture, and strength. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1993, 90:10250-10254.
7. Wehrli F.W., Ford J.C., Attie M., Kressel H.Y., Kaplan F.S. Trabecular structure: preliminary application of MR interferometry. Radiology 1991, 179:615-621.
8. 2* decay characteristics at MR imaging. Radiology 1998, 209:531-536.
9. Yeung D.K., Griffith J.F., Antonio G.E., Lee F.K., Woo J., Leung P.C. Osteoporosis is associated with increased marrow fat content and decreased marrow fat unsaturation: a proton MR spectroscopic study. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005, 22:279-285.
10. Wehrli F.W., Hopkins J.A., Hwang S.N., Song H.K., Snyder P.J., Haddad J.G. Cross-sectional study of osteopenia with quantitative MR imaging and bone densitometry. Radiology 2000, 217:527-538.
11. Schellinger D., Lin C.S., Lim J., Hatipoglu H.G., Pezzullo J.C., Singer A.J. Bone marrow fat and bone mineral density on proton MR spectroscopy and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: their ratio as a new indicator of bone weakening. Am J Roentgenol 2004, 183:1761-1765.
12. Griffith J.F., Yeung D.K., Antonio G.E., Wong S.Y., Kwok T.C., Woo J., et al. Vertebral marrow fat content and diffusion and perfusion indexes in women with varying bone density: MR evaluation. Radiology 2006, 241:831-838.
13. Liney G.P., Bernard C.P., Manton D.J., Turnbull L.W., Langton C.M. Age, gender and skeletal variation in bone marrow composition: a preliminary study at 3.0Tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007, 26:787-793.
14. Schellinger D., Lin C.S., Hatipoglu H.G., Fertikh D. Potential value of vertebral proton MR spectroscopy in determining bone weakness. Am J Neuroradiol 2001, 22:1620-1627.
15. Yeung D.K., Wong S.Y., Griffith J.F., Lau E.M. Bone marrow diffusion in osteoporosis: evaluation with quantitative MR diffusion imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004, 19:222-228.
16. Griffith J.F., Yeung D.K., Antonio G.E., Lee F.K., Hong A.W., Wong S.Y., et al. Vertebral bone mineral density, marrow perfusion, and fat content in healthy men and men with osteoporosis: dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and MR spectroscopy. Radiology 2005, 236:945-951.
17. Hatipoglu H.G., Selvi A., Ciliz D., Yuksel E. Quantitative and diffusion MR imaging as a new method to assess osteoporosis. Am J Neuroradiol 2007, 28:1934-1937.
18. Ueda Y., Miyati T., Ohno N., Motono Y., Hara M., Shibamoto Y., et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient and fractional anisotropy in the vertebral bone marrow. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010, 31:632-635.
19. Manenti G., Capuani S., Fanucci E., Parfait E.A., Masala S., Sorge R., et al. Diffusion tensor imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopy assessment of cancellous bone quality in femoral neck of healthy, osteopenic and osteoporotic subjects at 3T: preliminary experience. Bone 2013, 55:7-15.
20. Capuani S. Water diffusion in cancellous bone. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 2013, 178:34-38.
21. Capuani S., Rossi C., Alesiani M., Maraviglia B. Diffusion tensor imaging to study anisotropy in a particular porous system: the trabecular bone network. Solid State Nucl Magn Reson 2005, 28:266-272.
22. Sigmund E.E., Cho H., Song Y.-Q. High-resolution MRI of internal field diffusion-weighting in trabecular bone. NMR Biomed 2009, 22:436-448.
23. De Santis S., Rebuzzi M., Di Pietro G., Fasano F., Maraviglia B., Capuani S. In vitro and in vivo MR evaluation of internal gradient to assess trabecular bone density. Phys Med Biol 2010, 55:5767-5785.
24. Sigmund E.E., Cho H., Chen P., Byrnes S., Song Y.-Q., Guo X.E., et al. Diffusion-based MR methods for bone structure and evolution. Magn Reson Med 2008, 59:28-39.
25. Capuani S., Curzi F., Alessandri F.M., Maraviglia B., Bifone A. Characterization of trabecular bone by dipolar demagnetizing field MRI. Magn Reson Med 2001, 46:683-689.
26. Capuani S., Alessandri F.M., Bifone A., Maraviglia B. Multiple spin echoes for the evaluation of trabecular bone quality. MAGMA 2002, 14:3-9.
27. Wehrli F.W. Magnetic resonance of calcified tissues. J Magn Reson 2013, 229:35-48.
28. Netter F.H., Woodburne R.T., Crelin E.S., Kaplan F. Musculoskeletal system, part 1: anatomy, physiology, and metabolic disorders. Netter collection of medical illustrations October 1987, 8. CIBA-GEIGY Corporation (Ed.).
29. Watson A.T., Chang C.T.P. Characterizing porous media with NMR methods. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc 1997, 31:343-386.
30. Wilson R.C., Hurlimann Relationship between susceptibility induced field inhomogeneities, restricted diffusion, and relaxation in sedimentary rocks. J Magn Reson 2006, 183:1-12.
31. Hwang S.N., Wehrli F.W. The calculation of the susceptibility-induced magnetic field from 3D NMR images with applications to trabecular bone. J Magn Reson 1995, 109:126-145.
32. Yablonskiy D.A., Haacke E.M. Theory of NMR signal behavior in magnetically inhomogeneous tissues: the static dephasing regime. Magn Reson Med 1994, 32:749-763.
33. Hopkins J.A., Wehrli F.W. Magnetic susceptibility measurement of insoluble solids by NMR: magnetic susceptibility of bone. Magn Reson Med 1997, 37:494-500.
34. Majumdar S., Gore J.C. Studies of diffusion in random fields produced by variations in susceptibility. J Magn Reson 1988, 78:41-55.
35. Carr H.Y., Purcell E.M. Effects of diffusion on free precession in nuclear magnetic resonance experiments. Phys Rev 1954, 94:630-638.
36. Callaghan P.T. Principles of nuclear magnetic resonance microscopy 1995, Oxford Science Publications.
37. Engelke K., Adams J.E., Armbrecht G., Augat P., Bogado C.E., Bouxsein M.L., et al. Clinical use of quantitative computed tomography and peripheral quantitative computed tomography in the management of osteoporosis in adults: the 2007 ISCD Official Positions. J Clin Densitom 2008, 11:123-162.
38. Provencher S.W. Estimation of metabolite concentrations from localized in vivo proton NMR spectra. Magn Reson Med 1993, 30:672-679.
39. Lin J.C., Amling M., Newitt D.C., Selby K., Srivastav S.K., Delling G., et al. Heterogeneity of trabecular bone structure in the calcaneus using magnetic resonance imaging. Osteoporos Int 1998, 8:16-24.
40. Athavale S.A., Joshi S.D., Joshi S.S. Internal architecture of calcaneus: correlations with mechanics and pathoanatomy of calcaneal fractures. Surg Radiol Anat 2010, 32:115-122.
41. Song H.K., Wehrli F.W., Ma J. Field strength and angle dependence of trabecular bone marrow transverse relaxation in the calcaneus. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997, 7:382-388.
42. Dooms G.C., Fisher M.R., Hricak H., Richardson M., Crooks L.E., Genant H.K. Bone marrow imaging: magnetic resonance studies related to age and sex. Radiology 1985, 155:429-432.