Apparent diffusion coefficient and fractional anisotropy in the vertebral bone marrow

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 632-635

  Ueda, Yu ^a   Miyati, Tosiaki ^b   Ohno, Naoki ^c   Motono, Yuko ^a   Hara, Masaki ^d   Shibamoto, Yuta ^d   Kasai, Harumasa ^d   Kawamitsu, Hideaki ^a   Matsubara, Kosuke ^b  

^a KOBE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^b KANAZAWA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c KANAZAWA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^d NAGOYA CITY UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC); Bone mineral density (BMD); Fat fraction (FF); Fractional anisotropy (FA); Lumbar vertebral bone marrow; Trabecular bone

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANISOTROPY; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; BONE MARROW; CANCELLOUS BONE; CHILD; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; DUAL ENERGY X RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; ECHO PLANAR IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMAN; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCHOOL CHILD; VERTEBRA BODY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANISOTROPY; BONE MARROW; CHILD; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77649229103     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22073     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. NIH Consensus Development Panel on Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis, and Therapy. Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. JAMA 2001;285:785-795.
2. Kanis JA, Delmas P, Burckhardt P, Cooper C, Torgerson D. Guidelines for diagnosis and management of osteoporosis. The European foundation for osteoporosis and bone disease. Osteoporos Int 1997;7:390-406.
3. Guglielmi G, Grimston SK, Fischer KC, Pacifici R. Osteoporosis: diagnosis with lateral and posteroanterior dual x-ray absorptiometry compared with quantitative CT. Radiology 1994;192: 845-850.
4. Kang C, Paley M, Ordidge R, Speller R. In vivo MRI measurements of bone quality in the calcaneus: a comparison with DXA and ultrasound. Osteoporos Int 1999;9:65-74.
5. WHO scienti.c group on the assessment of osteoporosis at primary health care level. Summary meeting report. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2004.
6. Camozzi V, Luisetto G, Zangari M, Lumachi F. Quantitative ultrasound technology in evaluating bone status and osteoporosis in patients with Cushing's syndrome. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2007;1117: 352-356.
7. Mcbroom RJ, Hayes WC, Edwards WT, Goldberg RP, White AA 3rd. Prediction of vertebral body compressive fracture using quantitative computed tomography. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1985;67:1206-1214.
8. Link TM. High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging to assess trabecular bone structure in patients after transplantation: a review. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2002;13:365-375.
9. Wehrli FW, Ford JC, Haddad JG. Osteoporosis: clinical assessment with quantitative MR imaging in diagnosis. Radiology 1995; 196:631-641.
10. 2* decay characteristics at MR imaging. Radiology 1998;209:531-536.
11. Schellinger D, Lin CS, Lim J, Hatipoglu HG, Pezzullo JC, Singer AJ. Bone marrow fat and bone mineral density on proton MR spectroscopy and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: their ratio as a new indicator of bone weakening. Am J Roentgenol 2004; 183:1761-1765.
12. Griffith JF, Yeung DK, Antonio GE, et al. Vertebral marrow fat content and diffusion and perfusion indexes in women with varying bone density: MR evaluation. Radiology 2006;241:831-838.
13. Hatipoglu HG, Selvi A, Ciliz D, Yuksel E. Quantitative and diffusion MR imaging as a new method to assess osteoporosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1934-1937.
14. Nonomura Y, Yasumoto M, Yoshimura R, et al. Relationship between bone marrow cellularity and apparent diffusion coefficient. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;13:757-760.
15. Yeung DK, Wong SY, Griffith JF, Lau EM. Bone marrow diffusion in osteoporosis: Evaluation with quantitative MR diffusion imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;19:222-228.
16. Vande Berg BC, Malghem J, Lecouvet FE, Maldague B. Magnetic resonance imaging of the normal bone marrow. Skeletal Radiol 1998;27:471-483.
17. 2 weighted echo planar magnetic resonance imaging. NMR Biomed 2000;13:321-328.
18. Sigmund EE, Cho H, Chen P, et al. Diffusion-based MR methods for bone structure and evolution. Magn Reson Med 2008;59: 28-39.
19. Damon BM. Effects of image noise in muscle diffusion tensor (DT)-MRI assessed using numerical simulations. Magn Reson Med 2008;60:934-44.