Incidental findings on sonography of the breast: Clinical significance and diagnostic workup

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 173, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 921-927

  Buchberger, Wolfgang ^a   DeKoekkoek Doll, Petra ^a   Springer, Peter ^a   Obrist, Peter ^b   Dünser, Martina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL INNSBRUCK   (Austria)

^b UNIVERSITY OF INNSBRUCK   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ASPIRATION BIOPSY; BENIGN TUMOR; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER INCIDENCE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALIGNANT NEOPLASTIC DISEASE; MAMMOGRAPHY; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0032842902     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.173.4.10511149     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bassett LW, Kimme-Smith C, Sutherland LK, Gold RH, Sarti D, King W. Automated and hand-held breast US: effect on patient management. Radiology 1987;165:103-108
2. Sickles EA, Filly RA, Callen PW. Breast cancer detection with sonography and mammography: comparison using state-of-the-art equipment. AJR 1983;140:843-845
3. Kopans DB, Meyer JE, Lindfors KK. Whole-breast US imaging: four-year follow-up. Radiology 1985;157:505-507
4. Cole-Beuglet C, Soriano RZ, Kurtz AB, Goldberg BB. Ultrasound analysis of 104 primary breast carcinomas classified according to histopathologic type. Radiology 1983;147:191-196
5. Egan RL, Egan KL. Detection of breast carcinoma: comparison of automated water-path whole breast sonography, mammography, and physical examination. AJR 1984;143:493-497
6. Jackson VP. Present and future role of ultrasound in breast imaging. In: Haus AG, Yaffe MJ, eds. Syllabus: a categorical course in physics - technical aspects of breast imaging. Oak Brook, IL: Radiological Society of North America, 1993:241-247
7. Kopans DB. Priorities for improved breast cancer imaging. In: Haus AG, Yaffe MJ, eds. Syllabus: a categorical course in physics - technical aspects of breast imaging. Oak Brook. IL: Radiological Society of North America, 1993:299-303
8. Gordon PB, Goldenberg SL, Chan NHL. Solid breast lesions: diagnosis with US-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Radiology 1993;189:573-580
9. Parker SH, Jobe WE, Dennis MA, et al. US-guided automated large core breast biopsy. Radiology 1993;187:507-511
10. Gordon PB, Goldenberg SL. Malignant breast masses detected only by ultrasound. Cancer 1995; 76:626-630
11. Weinstein BJ, Phillips G, Kumari-Subaiya S, Fogel SR. Ultrasound detection of non-palpable non-mammographically visible breast cancer (abstr). J Ultrasound Med 1996;15[suppl]:117
12. KoIb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Occult cancer in women with dense breasts: detection with screening US - diagnostic yield and tumor characteristics. Radiology 1998;207:191-199
13. American College of Radiology. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS), 2nd ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 1995
14. Stavros TA, Thickman D, Rapp CL, Dennis MA, Parker SH, Sisney GA. Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology 1995;196:123-134
15. Fajardo L, Hillman BJ, Frey C. Correlation between breast parenchymal patterns and mammographic certainty of diagnosis. Invest Radiol 1988;23:505-508
16. Jackson VP, Hendrick RE, Feig SA, Kopans DB. Imaging of the radiographically dense breast. Radiology 1993;188:297-301
17. Bird RE, Wallace TW, Yanaskas BC. Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. Radiology 1992;184:613-617
18. Ma L, Fishell E, Wright B, Hanna W, Allan S, Boyd NF. Case control study of factors associated with failure to detect breast cancer by mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst 1992;84:781-785
19. Schmidt J, Silen W, Sadowsky NI, Connolly JH, Harris JR. Ductal carcinoma of the breast. N Engl J Med 1988;318:898-903
20. Verbeek ALM, Hendriks JHCL, Holland R, et al. Reduction of breast cancer mortality through mass screening with modern mammography: first results of the Nijmegen Project, 1975-1981. Lancet 1984;1:1222-1224
21. Stomper PC, Margolin FR. Ductal carcinoma in situ: the mammographer's perspective. AJR 1994; 162:585-591
22. Nishimura S, Matsue S, Koizumi S, Maetani S. Optimal combination of diagnostic items in breast ultrasonography. In: Madjar H, Teubner J, Hackelöer BJ, eds. Breast ultrasound update. Basel: Karger, 1994:75-82
23. Mundinger A, Hirschmann I, Madjar H. Scoring of sonographic and mammographic findings: a new tool for characterization of breast lesions. In: Madjar H, Teubner J, Hackelöer BJ, eds. Breast ultrasound update. Basel: Karger, 1994:83-90
24. Rizzato G, Chersevani R, Solbiati L, et al. High-resolution sonography of breast ducts (abstr). Radiology 1992;185(P):378
25. Kamio T, Kameoka S, Hamano K. Ductal echography: classification of ducts. In: Madjar H, Teubner J, Hackelöer BJ, eds. Breast ultrasound update. Basel: Karger, 1994:174-182
26. Rizzato G, Chersevani R, Abbona M, Lombardo VL, Macorig D. High-resolution sonography of breast carcinoma. Eur J Radiol 1997;24:11-19
27. Buchberger W, Unsinn K, Springer P, Stoeger A, Dessl A, Chemelli A. Evaluation of intraductal breast lesions with high-resolution sonography: comparison with galactography (abstr). Radiology 1996;201(P):444-445
28. Fornage BD, Sneige N, Singletary SE. Masses in breasts with implants: diagnosis with US-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Radiology 1994; 191:339-342
29. Sickles EA, Filly RA, Callen PW. Benign breast lesions: ultrasound detection and diagnosis. Radiology 1984;151:467-507
30. Bassett L, Kimme-Smith C. Breast sonography. AJR 1991;156:449-455
31. Stevens K, Burrell HC, Evans AJ, Sibbering DM. The ultrasound appearance of galactoceles. Br J Radiol 1997;70:239-241
32. Leucht WJ, Rabe DR, Humbert KD. Diagnostic value of different interpretative criteria in realtime sonography of the breast. Ultrasound Med Biol 1988;14[suppll]:59-73
33. 3. J Ultrasound Med 1990;9:559-560