Sonographically depicted breast clustered microcysts: Is follow-up appropriate?

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 185, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 952-959

  Berg, Wendie A ^a  

^a Johns Hopkins Green Spring   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; APOCRINE CARCINOMA; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER SIZE; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FIBROCYSTIC BREAST DISEASE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERVENTION STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TUMOR BIOPSY; BREAST TUMOR; ECHOGRAPHY; FIBROADENOMA; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; FIBROADENOMA; FIBROCYSTIC BREAST DISEASE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 32944469060     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.04.0929     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Berg W, Campassi C, Ioffe O. Cystic lesions of the breast: sonographic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 2003; 227:183-191
2. Hilton SV, Leopold GR, Olson LK, Willson SA. Real-time breast sonography: application in 300 consecutive patients. AJR 1986; 147:479-486
3. American College of Radiology. Illustrated breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS): ultrasound, 1st ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 2003
4. Warner JK, Kumar D, Berg WA. Apocrine metaplasia: mammographic and sonographic appearances. AJR 1998; 170:1375-1379
5. Jackson VP. The current role of ultrasonography in breast imaging. Radiol Clin North Am 1995; 33:1161-1170
6. Bassett LW. Imaging of breast masses. Radiol Clin North Am 2000; 38:669-691
7. Parker SH, Jobe WE, Dennis MA, et al. US-guided automated large-core breast biopsy. Radiology 1993; 187:507-511
8. Berg W, Gutierrez L, Nessaiver MS, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology 2004; 233:830-849
9. Moon WK, Noh DY, Im JG. Multifocal, multicentric, and contralateral breast cancers: bilateral whole-breast US in the preoperative evaluation of patients. Radiology 2002; 224:569-576
10. Hlawatsch A, Teifke A, Schmidt M, Thelen M. Preoperative assessment of breast cancer: sonography versus MR imaging. AJR 2002; 179:1493-1501
11. Gordon PB, Goldenberg SL. Malignant breast masses detected only by ultrasound: a retrospective review. Cancer 1995; 76:626-630
12. Buchberger W, Niehoff A, Obrist P, DeKoekkoek-Doll P, Dunser M. Clinically and mammographically occult breast lesions: detection and classification with high-resolution sonography. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2000; 21:325-336
13. Kaplan SS. Clinical utility of bilateral whole-breast US in the evaluation of women with dense breast tissue. Radiology 2001; 221:641-649
14. Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology 2002; 225:165-175
15. Crystal P, Strano SD, Shcharynski S, Koretz MJ. Using sonography to screen women with mammographically dense breasts. AJR 2003; 181:177-182
16. Leconte I, Feger C, Galant C, et al. Mammography and subsequent whole-breast sonography of nonpalpable breast cancers: the importance of radiologic breast density. AJR 2003; 180:1675-1679
17. Berg WA. Supplemental screening sonography in dense breasts. Radiol Clin North Am 2004; 42:845-851
18. American College of Radiology. Illustrated breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS): mammography, 4th ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 2003
19. Sickles EA. Management of probably benign lesions of the breast. Radiology 1994; 193:582-583
20. Sickles EA. Periodic mammographic follow-up of probably benign lesions: results in 3184 consecutive cases. Radiology 1991; 179:463-468
21. Sickles EA. Nonpalpable, circumscribed, noncalcified solid breast masses: likelihood of malignancy based on lesion size and age of patient. Radiology 1994; 192:439-442
22. Varas X, Leborgne F, Leborgne JH. Nonpalpable, probably benign lesions: role of follow-up mammography. Radiology 1992; 184:409-414
23. Varas X, Leborgne JH, Leborgne F, Mezzera J, Jaumandreu S, Leborgne F. Revisiting the mammographic follow-up of BI-RADS category 3 lesions. AJR 2002; 179:691-695
24. Vizcaino I, Gadea L, Andreo L, et al. Short-term follow-up results in 795 nonpalpable probably benign lesions detected at screening mammography. Radiology 2001; 219:475-483
25. Sickles E. Breast calcifications: mammographic evaluation. Radiology 1986; 160:289-293
26. Berg WA. Breast ultrasonography: cystic lesions and probably benign findings. In: Berg WA, Javitt MC, eds. Women's imaging: strategies for clinical practice-categorical course syllabus. Leesburg, VA: American Roentgen Ray Society, 2004:95-102
27. Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, Dennis MA, Parker SH, Sisney GA. Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology 1995; 196:123-134
28. Rahbar G, Sie AC, Hansen GC, et al. Benign versus malignant solid breast masses: US differentiation. Radiology 1999; 213:889-894
29. Hong AS, Rosen EL, Soo MS, Baker JA. BI-RADS for sonography: positive and negative predictive values of sonographic features. AJR 2005; 184:1260-1265
30. Graf O, Helbich TH, Fuchsjaeger MH, et al. Follow-up of palpable circumscribed noncalcified solid breast masses at mammography and US: can biopsy be averted? Radiology 2004; 223:850-856
31. Mendelson EB, Berg WA, Merritt CR. Toward a standardized breast ultrasound lexicon, BI-RADS: ultrasound. Semin Roentgenol 2001; 36:217-225
32. Venta LA, Kim JP, Pelloski CE, Morrow M. Management of complex breast cysts. AJR 1999; 173:1331-1336
33. Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Occult cancer in women with dense breasts: detection with screening US-diagnostic yield and tumor characteristics. Radiology 1998; 207:191-199
34. Buchberger W, DeKoekkoek-Doll P, Springer P, Obrist P, Dunser M. Incidental findings on sonography of the breast: clinical significance and diagnostic workup. AJR 1999; 173:921-927
35. Parker SH. Burbank F, Jackman RJ, et al. Percutaneous large-core breast biopsy: a multi-institutional study. Radiology 1994; 193:359-364
36. Pal S, Ikeda DM, Birdwell RL. Compliance with recommended follow-up after fine-needle aspiration biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: a retrospective study. Radiology 1996; 201:71-74
37. Goodman KA, Birdwell RL, Ikeda DM. Compliance with recommended follow-up after percutaneous breast core biopsy. AJR 1998; 170:89-92
38. Brenner RJ, Jackman RJ, Parker SH, et al. Percutaneous core needle biopsy of radial scars of the breast: when is excision necessary? AJR 2002; 179:1179-1184
39. Fajardo LL, Pisano ED, Caudry DJ, et al. Stereotactic and sonographic large-core biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: results of the Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group V stady. Acad Radiol 2004; 11:293-308
40. Huber S, Wagner M, Medl M, Czembirek H. Real-time spatial compound imaging in breast ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 2002; 28:155-163
41. Seo BK, Oh YW, Kim HR, et al. Sonographic evaluation of breast nodules: comparison of conventional, real-time compound, and pulse-inversion harmonic images. Korean J Radiol 2002; 3:38-44
42. Merritt C, Piccoli C, Forsberg F, Wilkes A, Cavanaugh B, Lee S. Real-time spatial compound imaging of the breast: clinical evaluation of masses, (abstr) Radiology 2000; 217(P):491-492
43. Szopinski KT, Pajk AM, Wysocki M, Amy D, Szopinska M, Jakubowski W. Tissue harmonic imaging: utility in breast sonography. J Ultrasound Med 2003; 22:479-487
44. Wellings SR, Jensen HM, Marcum RG. An atlas of subgross pathology of the human breast with special reference to possible precancerous lesions. J Natl Cancer Inst 1975; 55:231-273
45. Kushwaha AC, O'Toole M, Sneige N, Stelling CB, Dryden MJ. Mammographic-pathologic correlation of apocrine metaplasia diagnosed using vacuum-assisted stereotactic core-needle biopsy: our 4-year experience. AJR 2003; 180:795-798
46. Berg WA. Rationale for a trial of screening breast ultrasound: American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN) 6666. AJR 2003; 180:1225-1228