Magnetic resonance imaging screening of the contralateral breast in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis of incremental cancer detection and impact on surgical management

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Volumn 27, Issue 33, 2009, Pages 5640-5649

  Brennan, Meagan Elizabeth ^a   Houssami, Nehmat ^a   Lord, Sarah ^a   Macaskill, Petra ^a   Irwig, Les ^a   Dixon, J Michael ^a   Warren, Ruth M L ^a   Ciatto, Stefano ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER INVASION; CANCER SCREENING; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURGERY; CLINICAL TRIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; MASTECTOMY; META ANALYSIS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; BREAST; BREAST TUMOR; COHORT ANALYSIS; INCIDENCE; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; MASS SCREENING; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; PATHOLOGY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; PREOPERATIVE CARE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SECOND CANCER; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL MODEL; SURVIVAL;

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COHORT STUDIES; FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; LOGISTIC MODELS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MASS SCREENING; MASTECTOMY; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; NEOPLASMS, SECOND PRIMARY; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREOPERATIVE CARE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 73949112876     PISSN: 0732183X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.5756     Document Type: Review

References (47)

1. Carmichael AR, Bendall S, Lockerbie L, et al: The long-term outcome of synchronous bilateral breast cancer is worse than metachronous or unilateral tumours. Eur J Surg Oncol 28:388-391, 2002
2. Kollias J, Ellis IO, Elston CW, et al: Prognostic significance of synchronous and metachronous bilateral breast cancer. World J Surg 25:1117-1124, 2001
3. Takahashi H, Watanabe K, Takahashi M, et al: The impact of bilateral breast cancer on the prognosis of breast cancer: A comparative study with unilateral breast cancer. Breast Cancer 12:196-202, 2005
4. Houssami N, Ciatto S, Macaskill P, et al: Accuracy and surgical impact of MRI in breast cancer staging: Systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:3248-3258, 2008
5. Solin LJ, Orel SG, Hwang W-T, et al: Relationship of breast magnetic resonance imaging to outcome after breast-conservation treatment with radiation for women with early-stage invasive breast carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ. J Clin Oncol 26:386-391, 2008
6. Turnbull L: Magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer: Results of the COMICE trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat 10:10, 2008 (suppl 3)
7. Lehman CD, Gatsonis C, Kuhl CK, et al: MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. N Engl J Med 356:1295-1303, 2007
8. Siva N: Using MRI to detect contralateral breast cancer. Lancet Oncol 8:377, 2007
9. Lee SG, Orel SG, Woo IJ, et al: MR imaging screening of the contralateral breast in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer: Preliminary results. Radiology 226:773-778, 2003
10. Buxant F, Scuotto F, Hottat N, et al: Does preoperative magnetic resonance imaging modify breast cancer surgery? Acta Chir Belg 107:288-291, 2007
11. Pediconi F, Catalano C, Roselli A, et al: Contrast-enhanced MR mammography for evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with diagnosed unilateral breast cancer or high-risk lesions. Radiology 243:670-680, 2007
12. Lehman CD, Blume JD, Thickman D, et al: Added cancer yield of MRI in screening the contralateral breast of women recently diagnosed with breast cancer: Results from the International Breast Magnetic Resonance Consortium (IBMC) trial. J Surg Oncol 92:9-15, 2005; discussion 16
13. Lee JM, Orel SG, Czerniecki BJ, et al: MRI before reexcision surgery in patients with breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182:473-480, 2004
14. Liberman L, Morris EA, Kim CM, et al: MR imaging findings in the contralateral breast of women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180:333-341, 2003
15. Bilimoria KY, Cambic A, Hansen NM, et al: Evaluating the impact of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging on the surgical management of newly diagnosed breast cancers. Arch Surg 142:441-445, 2007; discussion 445-447
16. Hollingsworth AB, Stough RG: Preoperative breast MRI for locoregional staging. J Okla State Med Assoc 99:505-515, 2006
17. Rieber A, Schirrmeister H, Gabelmann A, et al: Pre-operative staging of invasive breast cancer with MR mammography and/or PET: Boon or bunk? Br J Radiol 75:789-798, 2002
18. Slanetz PJ, Edmister WB, Yeh ED, et al: Occult contralateral breast carcinoma incidentally detected by breast magnetic resonance imaging. Breast J 8:145-148, 2002
19. Bagley FH: The role of magnetic resonance imaging mammography in the surgical management of the index breast cancer. Arch Surg 139:380-383, 2004
20. Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS, et al: Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology 233:830-849, 2004
21. Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E: Breast carcinoma: Effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology 213:881-888, 1999
22. Rieber A, Merkle E, Bohm W, et al: MRI of histologically confirmed mammary carcinoma: Clinical relevance of diagnostic procedures for detection of multifocal or contralateral secondary carcinoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 21:773-779, 1997
23. Deurloo E, Peterse J, Rutgers E, et al: Additional breast lesions in patients eligible for breastconserving therapy by MRI: Impact on preoperative management and potential benefit of computerised analysis. Eur J Cancer 41:1393-1401, 2005
24. Hlawatsch A, Teifke A, Schmidt M, et al: Preoperative assessment of breast cancer: Sonography versus MR Imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:1493-1501, 2002
25. Schelfout K, VanGoethem M, Kersschot E, et al: Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of breast lesions and effect on treatment. Eur J Surg Oncol 30:501-507, 2004
26. Kepple J, Layeeque R, Klimberg VS, et al: Correlation of magnetic resonance imaging and pathologic size of infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast. Am J Surg 190:623-627, 2005
27. Munot K, Dall B, Achuthan R, et al: Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis and single-stage surgical resection of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast. Br J Surg 89:1296-1301, 2002
28. Quan ML, Sclafani L, Heerdt AS, et al: Magnetic resonance imaging detects unsuspected disease in patients with invasive lobular cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 10:1048-1053, 2003
29. Yeh ED, Slanetz PJ, Edmister WB, et al: Invasive lobular carcinoma: Spectrum of enhancement and morphology on magnetic resonance imaging. Breast J 9:13-18, 2003
30. SAS Institute: SAS/STAT User's Guide. Cary, NC, SAS Institute, 1999
31. Liberman L, Morris EA, Dershaw DD, et al: MR imaging of the ipsilateral breast in women with percutaneously proven breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180:901-910, 2003
32. Houssami N, Ciatto S, Bilous M, et al: Borderline breast core needle histology: Predictive values for malignancy in lesions of uncertain malignant potential (B3). Br J Cancer 96:1253-1257, 2007
33. Tsikitis VL, Chung MA: Biology of ductal carcinoma in situ classification based on biologic potential. Am J Clin Oncol 29:305-310, 2006
34. Schaapveld M, Visser O, Louwman WJ, et al: The impact of adjuvant therapy on contralateral breast cancer risk and the prognostic significance of contralateral breast cancer: A population based study in the Netherlands. Breast Cancer Res Treat 110:189-197, 2008
35. Montgomery DA, Krupa K, Jack WJL, et al: Changing pattern of the detection of locoregional relapse in breast cancer: The Edinburgh experience. Br J Cancer 96:1802-1807, 2007
36. Hayes DF: Clinical practice: Follow-up of patients with early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 356:2505-2513, 2007
37. Drew PJ, Harvey I, Hanby A, et al: The UK NIHR multicentre randomised COMICE trial of MRI planning for breast conserving treatment for breast cancer. San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, San Antonio, TX, December 10-14, 2008 (abstr 51)
38. Viehweg P, Rotter K, Laniado M, et al: MR imaging of the contralateral breast in patients after breast-conserving therapy. Eur Radiol 14:402-408, 2004
39. Van Goethem M, Tjalma W, Schelfout K, et al: Magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 32:901-910, 2006
40. Wiener JI, Schilling KJ, Adami C, et al: Assessment of suspected breast cancer by MRI: A prospective clinical trial using a combined kinetic and morphologic analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:878-886, 2005
41. Ozaki STM, Fukuma E, Kawano N, et al: Bilateral breast MR imaging: Is it superior to conventional methods for the detection of contralateral breast cancer? Breast Cancer 15:169-174, 2008
42. Echevarria JJ, Martin M, Saiz A, et al: Overall breast density in MR mammography: Diagnostic and therapeutic implications in breast cancer. J Comput Assist Tomogr 30:140-147, 2006
43. Pediconi F, Catalano C, Padula S, et al: Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance mammography: Does it affect surgical decision-making in patients with breast cancer? Breast Cancer Res Treat 106:65-74, 2007
44. Pediconi F, Venditti F, Padula S, et al: CE-magnetic resonance mammography for the evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with diagnosed breast cancer. Radiol Med (Torino) 110:61-68, 2005
45. Schelfout K, Van Goethem M, Kersschot E, et al: Preoperative breast MRI in patients with invasive lobular breast cancer. Eur Radiol 14:1209-1216, 2004
46. Van Goethem M, Schelfout K, Dijckmans L, et al: MR mammography in the pre-operative staging of breast cancer in patients with dense breast tissue: Comparison with mammography and ultrasound. Eur Radiol 14:809-816, 2004
47. National Health and Medical Research Council: How to Review the Evidence: Systematic Identification and Review of the Scientific Literature. Canberra, Australia, Commonwealth of Australia, 2000, pp 62-63