Scaling up from greenhouse resistance to fitness in the field for a host of an emerging forest disease

Evolutionary Applications

Volumn 6, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 970-982

  Hayden, Katherine J ^a   Garbelotto, Matteo ^a   Dodd, Richard ^a   Wright, Jessica W ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b PACIFIC SOUTHWEST RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Forest management; Generalized linear mixed models; Host parasite interactions; Invasive species; Natural selection and contemporary evolution; Quantitative genetics; Sudden oak death; Survival analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 84882984005     PISSN: 17524563     EISSN: 17524571     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/eva.12080     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Agrios, G. N. 2005. Plant Pathology. Elsevier Academic Press, Amsterdam.
2. Allison, P. 1995. Survival Analysis Using the SAS System: A Practical Guide. SAS Publications, Cary, NC.
3. Anacker, B., N. Rank, D. Hüberli, M. Garbelotto, S. Gordon, T. Harnik, R. Whitkus et al. 2008. Susceptibility to Phytophthora ramorum in a key infectious host: landscape variation in host genotype, host phenotype, and environmental factors. New Phytologist 177:756-766.
4. Anagnostakis, S. L. 1987. Chestnut Blight: the classical problem of an introduced pathogen. Mycologia 79:23-37.
5. Anderson, P., A. Cunningham, N. Patel, F. Morales, P. Epstein, and P. Daszak 2004. Emerging infectious diseases of plants: pathogen pollution, climate change and agrotechnology drivers. Trends In Ecology and Evolution 19:535-544.
6. Antia, R., R. R. Regoes, J. C. Koella, and C. T. Bergstrom 2003. The role of evolution in the emergence of infectious diseases. Nature 426:658-661.
7. Baker, K. F. 1957. The U.C. System for Producing Healthy Container-Grown Plants Through the Use of Clean Soil, Clean Stock, and Sanitation. University of California, Division of Agricultural Sciences, Agricultural Experiment Station, Extension Service, Oakland, CA.
8. Bates, D., Maechler, M., and Bolker, M. 2011. Lme4: Linear Mixed-effects Models Using S4 Classes. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4
9. Bent, A. F., and D. Mackey 2007. Elicitors, effectors, and R genes: The new paradigm and a lifetime supply of questions. Annual Review of Phytopathology 45:399-436.
10. Bergemann, S. E., and M. Garbelotto 2006. High diversity of fungi recovered from the roots of mature tanoak (Lithocarpus densiflorus) in northern California. Canadian Journal of Botany 84:1380-1394.
11. Bowcutt, F. 2011. Tanoak target: the rise and fall of herbicide use on a common native tree. Environmental History 16:197-225.
12. Brasier, C. 2008. The biosecurity threat to the UK and global environment from international trade in plants. Plant Pathology 57:792-808.
13. Burdon, J. J. 1987. Diseases and Plant Population Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
14. Cappa, E. P., P. S. Pathauer, and G. A. Lopez 2010. Provenance variation and genetic parameters of Eucalyptus viminalis in Argentina. Tree Genetics and Genomes 6:981-994.
15. Carson, S. D., and M. J. Carson. 1989. Breeding for resistance in forest trees: a quantitative genetics approach. Annual Review of Phytopathology 27:373-395.
16. Cobb, R., R. Meentemeyer, and D. Rizzo 2010. Apparent competition in canopy trees determined by pathogen transmission rather than susceptibility. Ecology 91:327-333.
17. Cobb, R. C., J. A. N. Filipe, R. K. Meentemeyer, C. A. Gilligan, and D. M. Rizzo 2012. Ecosystem transformation by emerging infectious disease: loss of large tanoak from California forests. Journal of Ecology 100:712-722.
18. Conner, J. K., R. Franks, and C. Stewart 2003. Expression of additive genetic variances and covariances for wild radish floral traits: comparison between field and greenhouse environments. Evolution 57:487.
19. Cornelius, J. 1994. Heritabilities and additive genetic coefficients of variation in forest trees. Canadian Journal Of Forest Research-Revue Canadienne De Recherche Forestiere 24:372-379.
20. Davidson, J., S. Werres, M. Garbelotto, E. Hansen, and D. Rizzo 2003. Sudden Oak Death and associated diseases caused by Phytophthora ramorum. Plant Health Progress 23:372-379. doi:10.1094/PHP-2003-0707-01-DG.
21. Davidson, J. M., A. C. Wickland, H. A. Patterson, K. R. Falk, and D. M. Rizzo 2005. Transmission of Phytophthora ramorum in mixed-evergreen forest in California. Phytopathology 95:587-596.
22. Davis, F., M. Borchert, R. Meentemeyer, A. Flint, and D. M. Rizzo 2010. Pre-impact forest composition and ongoing tree mortality associated with sudden oak death in the Big Sur region; California. Forest Ecology and Management 259:2342-2354.
23. Desprez-Loustau, M., C. Robin, M. Buee, R. Courtecuisse, J. Garbaye, F. Suffert, I. Sache et al. 2007. The fungal dimension of biological invasions. Trends In Ecology and Evolution 22:472-480.
24. Dickerson, G. E. 1969. Techniques for research in quantitative animal genetics, pp .36-79. In Techniques and procedures in animal science research. American Society of Animal Science, Albany, New York.
25. Dieters, M. J., T. L. White, R. C. Littell, and G. R. Hodge 1995. Application of approximate variances of variance components and their ratios in genetic tests. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 91:15-24.
26. Dodd, R., D. Hüberli, W. Mayer, T. Harnik, Z. Afzal-Rafii, and M. Garbelotto 2008. Evidence for the role of synchronicity between host phenology and pathogen activity in the distribution of sudden oak death canker disease. New Phytologist 179:505-514.
27. Elliott, M., G. Sumampong, A. Varga, S. F. Shamoun, D. James, S. Masri, and N. J. Grünwald 2011. Phenotypic differences among three clonal lineages of Phytophthora ramorum. Forest Pathology 41:7-14.
28. Falconer, D. S. 1989. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Longman Scientific and Technical, Essex.
29. Fisher, R. 1918. The correlation between relatives on the supposition of Mendelian inheritance. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 52:399-433.
30. Fraedrich, S. W., T. C. Harrington, R. J. Rabaglia, M. D. Ulyshen, A. E. Mayfield, J. L. Hanula, J. M. Eickwort et al. 2008. A fungal symbiont of the Redbay Ambrosia Beetle causes a lethal wilt in Redbay and other Lauraceae in the Southeastern United States. Plant Disease 92:215-224.
31. Garbelotto, M., and K. J. Hayden 2012. Sudden oak death: interactions of the exotic oomycete Phytophthora ramorum with naïve North American hosts. Eukaryotic Cell 11:1313-1323.
32. Geospatial Innovation Facility and Kelly Research and Outreach Lab. 2011. Oakmapper Web GIS, www.oakmapper.org, accessed October 2011.
33. Gupta, A. P., and R. C. Lewontin 1982. A study of reaction norms in natural populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Evolution 36:934-948.
34. Hansen, E., J. Parke, and W. Sutton 2005. Susceptibility of Oregon forest trees and shrubs to Phytophthora ramorum: a comparison of artificial inoculation and natural infection. Plant Disease 89:63-70.
35. Hansen, E., A. Kanaskie, S. Prospero, M. McWilliams, E. Goheen, N. Osterbauer, P. Reeser et al. 2008. Epidemiology of Phytophthora ramorum in Oregon tanoak forests. Canadian Journal Of Forest Research-Revue Canadienne De Recherche Forestiere 38:1133-1143.
36. Hansen, T. F., C. Pelabon, and D. Houle 2011. Heritability is not evolvability. Evolutionary Biology 38:258-277.
37. Hayden, K. J., D. M. Rizzo, J. Tse, and M. Garbelotto 2004. Detection and quantification of Phytophthora ramorum from California forests using a real-time polymerase chain reaction assay. Phytopathology 94:1075-1083.
38. Hayden, K. J., K. Ivors, C. Wilkinson, and M. Garbelotto 2006. TaqMan chemistry for Phytophthora ramorum detection and quantification, with a comparison of diagnostic methods. Phytopathology 96:846-854.
39. Hayden, K. J., Alex. Lundquist, D. J. Schmidt, R. A. Sniezko, S. J. Frankel, and M. Garbelotto 2010. Tanoak resistance: can it be used to sustain populations? In S. J. Frankel, J. T. Kliejunas, and K. M. Palmieri, eds. Proceedings of the Sudden Oak Death Fourth Science Symposium, pp. 183-188. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany, CA.
40. Hayden, K. J., A. Nettel, R. S. Dodd, and M. Garbelotto 2011. Will all the trees fall? Variable resistance to an introduced forest disease in a highly susceptible host. Forest Ecology and Management 261:1781-1791.
41. Hickman, J. C., ed. 1993. The Jepson Manual: Higher Plants of California. University of California Press, Berkeley.
42. Houle, D. 1992. Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits. Genetics 130:195-204.
43. Hüberli, D., and M. Garbelotto 2011. Phytophthora ramorum is a generalist plant pathogen with differences in virulence between isolates from infectious and dead-end hosts. Forest Pathology 42:8-13.
44. Hüberli, D., K. J. Hayden, M. Calver, and M. Garbelotto 2011. Intraspecific variation in host susceptibility and climatic factors mediate epidemics of sudden oak death in western US forests. Plant Pathology 61:579-592.
45. Isik, F., H. V. Amerson, R. W. Whetten, S. A. Garcia, B. Li, and S. E. McKeand 2008. Resistance of Pinus taeda families under artificial inoculations with diverse fusiform rust pathogen populations and comparison with field trials. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 38:2687-2696.
46. Ivors, K., M. Garbelotto, I. D. Vries, C. Ruyter-Spira, B. Te Hekkert, N. Rosenzweig and P. Bonants 2006. Microsatellite markers identify three lineages of Phytophthora ramorum in US nurseries, yet single lineages in US forest and European nursery populations. Molecular Ecology 15:1493-1505.
47. Kasuga, T., M. Kozanitas, M. Bui, D. Hüberli, D. M. Rizzo, and M. Garbelotto 2012. Phenotypic diversification is associated with host-induced transposon derepression in the Sudden Oak Death pathogen Phytophthora ramorum. PLoS ONE 7:e34728. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0034728.
48. Kinloch, B., D. Davis, and D. Burton 2008. Resistance and virulence interactions between two white pine species and blister rust in a 30-year field trial. Tree Genetics and Genomes 4:65-74.
49. Kjaer, E. D., L. V. McKinney, L. R. Nielsen, L. N. Hansen, and J. K. Hansen 2012. Adaptive potential of ash (Fraxinus excelsior) populations against the novel emerging pathogen Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus. Evolutionary Applications 5:219-228.
50. Kowalski, T. 2006. Chalara fraxinea sp. nov. associated with dieback of ash (Fraxinus excelsior) in Poland. Forest Pathology 36:264-270.
51. Laine, A. 2011. Context-dependent effects of induced resistance under co-infection in a plant-pathogen interaction. Evolutionary Applications 4:696-707.
52. Lake, J. A., and R. N. Wade 2009. Plant-pathogen interactions and elevated CO2: morphological changes in favour of pathogens. Journal of Experimental Botany 60:3123-3131.
53. Lankau, R., P. S. Jørgensen, D. J. Harris, and A. Sih. 2011. incorporating evolutionary principles into environmental management and policy. Evolutionary Applications 4:315-325.
54. Loo, J. 2009. Ecological impacts of non-indigenous invasive fungi as forest pathogens. Biological Invasions 11:81-96.
55. Marron, N., S. Y. Dillen, and R. Ceulemans 2007. Evaluation of leaf traits for indirect selection of high yielding poplar hybrids. Environmental and Experimental Botany 61:103-116.
56. Mascheretti, S., P. Croucher, A. Vettraino, S. Prospero, and M. Garbelotto 2008. Reconstruction of the Sudden Oak Death epidemic in California through microsatellite analysis of the pathogen Phytophthora ramorum. Molecular Ecology 17:2755-2768.
57. Mascheretti, S., P. J. P. Croucher, M. Kozanitas, L. Baker, and M. Garbelotto 2009. Genetic epidemiology of the Sudden Oak Death pathogen Phytophthora ramorum in California. Molecular Ecology 18:4577-4590.
58. McPherson, B., S. Mori, D. Wood, M. Kelly, A. Storer, P. Svihra, and R. Standiford 2010. Responses of oaks and tanoaks to the sudden oak death pathogen after 8y of monitoring in two coastal California forests. Forest Ecology and Management 259:2248-2255.
59. Meentemeyer, R., N. Rank, D. Shoemaker, C. Oneal, A. Wickland, K. Frangioso, and D. Rizzo 2008. Impact of sudden oak death on tree mortality in the Big Sur ecoregion of California. Biological Invasions 10:1243-1255.
60. Monier, J.-M., and S. E. Lindow 2004. Frequency, size, and localization of bacterial aggregates on bean leaf surfaces. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 70:346-355.
61. Nettel, A., R. Dodd, and Z. Afzal-Rafii 2009. Genetic diversity, structure, and demographic change in tanoak, Lithocarpus densiflorus (Fagaceae), the most susceptible species to sudden oak death in California. American Journal of Botany 96:2224-2233.
62. Ortiz, B. R. 2006. Contemporary California Indians, oaks, and sudden oak death (Phytophthora ramorum). In A. Merenleder, D. McCreary, and K. L. Purcell, eds. Proceedings of the Sixth Symposium on Oak Woodlands: Today's Challenges, Tomorrow's Opportunities, pp 39-56. PSW-GTR-217 USDA-Forest Service, Albany, CA.
63. Powers Jr, H. R. ., and E. G. Kuhlman. 1987. Resistance of Loblolly Pine Sources to Fusiform Rust in Field Progeny Tests. Res. Pap. SE-268. USDA-Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, Asheville, NC.
64. R Development Core Team 2011. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
65. Ramage, B. S., K. L. O'Hara, and A. B. Forrestel 2011. Forest transformation resulting from an exotic pathogen: regeneration and tanoak mortality in coast redwood stands affected by sudden oak death. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 41:763-772.
66. Riska, B., T. Prout, and M. Turelli 1989. Laboratory estimates of heritabilities and genetic correlations in nature. Genetics 123:865-871.
67. Rizzo, D., and M. Garbelotto 2003. Sudden oak death: endangering California and Oregon forest ecosystems. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 1:197-204.
68. ® 9.2 User's Guide. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC.
69. Schoettle, A. W., and R. A. Sniezko 2007. Proactive intervention to sustain high-elevation pine ecosystems threatened by White Pine Blister Rust. Journal of Forest Research 12:327-336.
70. Scotti, I., L. Calvo-Vialettes, C. Scotti-Saintagne, M. Citterio, B. Degen, and D. Bonal 2010. Genetic variation for growth, morphological, and physiological traits in a wild population of the Neotropical shade-tolerant rainforest tree Sextonia Rubra (Mez) Van Der Werff (Lauraceae). Tree Genetics and Genomes 6:19-329.
71. Sniezko, R. 2006. Resistance breeding against nonnative pathogens in forest trees - current successes in North America. Canadian Journal Of Plant Pathology-Revue Canadienne De Phytopathologie 28:S270-S279.
72. Sokal, R. R., and F. J. Rohlf 1995. Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York.
73. Squillace, A. E. 1974. Average genetic correlations among offspring from open-pollinated forest trees. Silvae Genetica 23:149-156.
74. Stockwell, C. A., A. P. Hendry, and M. T. Kinnison 2003. Contemporary evolution meets conservation Biology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18:94-101.
75. Stukely, M., C. Crane, J. McComb, and I. Bennett 2007. Field survival and growth of clonal, micropropagated Eucalyptus marginata selected for resistance to Phytophthora cinnamomi. Forest Ecology and Management 238:330-334.
76. Wright, S. 1921. Correlation and causation. Journal of Agricultural Research 20:557-585.