Reasoning about 'irrational' actions: When intentional movements cannot be explained, the movements themselves are seen as the goal

Cognition

Volumn 129, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 309-327

  Schachner, Adena ^a   Carey, Susan ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Action understanding; Bayesian inference; Dance; Explanation; Imitation; Ritual

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DANCING; ENVIRONMENT; EXERCISE; HUMAN; MOTIVATION; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ACTION UNDERSTANDING; BAYESIAN INFERENCE; DANCE; EXPLANATION; IMITATION; RITUAL;

ADULT; BAYES THEOREM; COGNITION; DANCING; GOALS; HUMANS; INTENTION; LOGIC; MOVEMENT; SOCIAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 84882795411     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: 18737838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.07.006     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Adolph K.E., Berger S.E. Physical and motor development. Developmental science: An advanced textbook 2011, 241-302. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ. 6th ed. M.H. Bornstein, M.E. Lamb (Eds.).
2. Baker C.L., Saxe R., Tenenbaum J.B. Action understanding as inverse planning. Cognition 2009, 113:329-349.
3. Baldwin D., Baird Discerning intentions in dynamic human action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2001, 5:171-178.
4. Baldwin D., Baird J., Saylor M., Clark M.A. Infants parse dynamic action. Child Development 2001, 72:708-717.
5. Bekkering H., Wohlschlager A., Gattis M. Imitation of gestures in children is goal-directed. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2000, 53A(1):153-164.
6. Berinsky A.J., Huber G.A., Lenz G.S. Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com's mechanical turk. Political Analysis 2012, 20(3):351-368.
7. Brugger A., Lariviere L., Mumme D., Bushnell E. Doing the right thing: Infants' selection of actions to imitate from observed event sequences. Child Development 2007, 78(3):806-824.
8. Buresh J.S., Woodward A.L. Infants track action goals within and across agents. Cognition 2007, 104(2):287-314.
9. Carpenter M., Akhtar N., Tomasello M. Fourteen- to 18-month-old infants differentially imitate intentional and accidental actions. Infant Behavior and Development 1998, 21:315-330.
10. Carpenter M., Call J., Tomasello M. Twelve- and 18-month-olds copy actions in terms of goals. Developmental Science 2005, 8(1):F13-F20.
11. Csibra G. Teleological and referential understanding of action in infancy. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 2003, 358(1431):447.
12. Dennett D. The intentional stance 1987, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
13. Gattis M., Bekkering H., Wohlschläger A. Goal-directed imitation. The imitative mind 2002, 183-205. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. A. Meltzoff, W. Prinz (Eds.).
14. Gelman R., Durgin F., Kaufman L. Distinguishing between animates and inanimates: Not by motion alone. Causal cognition 1995, 150-184. Clarendon Press. D. Sperber, D. Premack, A.J. Premack (Eds.).
15. Gergely G., Bekkering H., Király I. Developmental psychology: Rational imitation in preverbal infants. Nature 2002, 415(6873):755.
16. Gergely G., Csibra G. Teleological reasoning in infancy: The infant's naive theory of rational action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2003, 7(7):287-292.
17. Gergely G., Nádasdy Z., Csibra G., Bíró S. Taking the intentional stance at 12 months of age. Cognition 1995, 56:165-193.
18. Gerson, S. A., & Woodward, A. L. (2013). Learning from their own actions: The unique effect of producing actions on infants' action understanding. Child Development. [Epub ahead of print]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12115.
19. Gleissner B., Meltzoff A.N., Bekkering H. Children's coding of human action: cognitive factors influencing imitation in 3-year-olds. Developmental Science 2000, 3(4):405-414.
20. Goodman, J. K., Cryder, C. E., & Cheema, A. (2012). Data collection in a flat world: The strengths and weaknesses of mechanical turk samples. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. <>. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2016308.
21. Hamlin J.K., Wynn K., Bloom P. Social evaluation by preverbal infants. Nature 2007, 450(7169):557-559.
22. Johnson S.C., Slaughter V., Carey S. Whose gaze will infants follow? The elicitation of gaze-following in 12-month-olds. Developmental Science 1998, 1:233-238.
23. Király I., Jovanovic B., Prinz W., Aschersleben G., Gergely G. The early origins of goal attribution in infancy. Consciousness and Cognition 2003, 12:752-769.
24. Legare, C. H. & Whitehouse, H. (2011). How is ritualistic behavior acquired and conceptualized across development? In Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Montreal, QC.
25. Lombrozo T. Causal-explanatory pluralism: How intentions, functions, and mechanisms influence causal ascriptions. Cognitive Psychology 2010, 1-30.
26. Lyons D.E., Young A.G., Keil F.C. The hidden structure of overimitation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2007, 104:19751-19756.
27. MacKay D.J.C. Bayesian interpolation. Neural Computation 1992, 4(3):415-447.
28. MacKay D.J.C. Information theory, inference, and learning algorithms 2003, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
29. Mason W., Suri S. Conducting behavioral research on Amazon's Mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods 2011, 44(1):1-23.
30. McGuigan N., Makinson J., Whiten A. From over-imitation to super-copying: Adults imitate causally irrelevant aspects of tool use with higher fidelity than young children. British Journal of Psychology 2011, 102:1-18.
31. Meltzoff A. Understanding the intentions of others: Re-enactment of intended acts by 18-month-old children. Developmental Psychology 1995, 31(5):838-850.
32. Meltzoff A.N., Williamson R.A. The importance of imitation for theories of social-cognitive development. Handbook of infant development 2010, 345-364. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford. 2nd ed. G. Bremner, T. Wachs (Eds.).
33. Nettl B. The study of ethnomusicology 1983, University of Illinois Press, Chicago.
34. Newman, Keil F., Kuhlmeier V., Wynn K. Early understandings of the link between agents and order. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2010, 107(40):17140-17145.
35. Nielsen M., Tomaselli K. Overimitation in Kalahari Bushman children and the origins of human cultural cognition. Psychological Science 2010, 21(5):729-736.
36. Olofson E.L., Baldwin D. Infants recognize similar goals across dissimilar actions involving object manipulation. Cognition 2011, 118:258-264.
37. Prasada S., Ferenz K., Haskell T. Conceiving of entities as objects and as stuff. Cognition 2002, 83(2):141-165.
38. Royce A.P. The anthropology of dance 2002, Princeton Book Company, Hightstown, NJ.
39. Saxe R., Carey S., Kanwisher N. Understanding other minds: Linking developmental psychology and functional neuroimaging. Annual Review of Psychology 2004, 55(1):87-124.
40. Schachner, A., & Carey, S. (2011). Spontaneous goal inference without clear external goals: Dance is defined in terms of goals, not by features of the movement. In Talk presented at the meeting of the Society for Music Perception and Cognition, Rochester, NY.
41. Schachner, A. & Carey, S. (in preparation). The essence of our concepts of dance, exercise and ritual: The rational inference that the movements are the goal.
42. Sommerville J., Woodward A., Needham A. Action experience alters 3-month-old infants' perception of others' actions. Cognition 2005, 96:B1-B11.
43. Southgate V., Johnson M.H., Csibra G. Infants attribute goals even to biomechanically impossible actions. Cognition 2008, 107(3):1059-1069.
44. Tenenbaum J.B., Griffiths T.L. Generalization, similarity, and Bayesian inference. The Behavioral and brain sciences 2001, 24(4):629-640.
45. Tremoulet P., Feldman J. Perception of animacy from the motion of a single object. Perception 2000, 29(8):943-952.
46. Tremoulet P., Feldman J. The influence of spatial context and the role of intentionality in the interpretation of animacy from motion. Perception and Psychophysics 2006, 68(6):1047.
47. Want S., Harris P. How do children ape? Applying concepts from the study of non-human primates to the developmental study of "imitation" in children. Developmental Science 2002, 5(1):1-41.
48. Whiten A., McGuigan N., Marshall-Pescini S., Hopper L.M. Emulation, imitation, over-imitation and the scope of culture for child and chimpanzee. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 2009, 364:2417-2428.
49. Williamson R.A., Markman E.M. Precision of imitation as a function of preschoolers' understanding of the goal of the demonstration. Developmental Psychology 2006, 42(4):723-731.
50. Wohlschlager A., Gattis M., Bekkering H. Action generation and action perception in imitation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 2003, 358:501-515.
51. Woodward A. Infants selectively encode the goal object of an actor's reach. Cognition 1998, 69(1):1-34.
52. Xu F., Tenenbaum J.B. Word learning as Bayesian inference. Psychological Review 2007, 114(2):245-272.
53. Zacks J., Tversky B., Iyer G. Perceiving, remembering, and communicating structure in events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2001, 130:29-58.