Review: Understanding the chromatin remodeling code

Plant Science

Volumn 211, Issue , 2013, Pages 137-145

  Ha, Misook ^a  

^a SAMSUNG Electronics   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Chromatin modifications; Chromatin remodeling; Computational analysis; Epigenomics

Indexed keywords

CHROMATIN; HISTONE; NUCLEOSOME; PROTEIN BINDING; SMALL INTERFERING RNA;

CHROMATIN; CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY; DNA METHYLATION; ENVIRONMENT; GENETIC EPIGENESIS; GENETICS; NUCLEOSOME; PLANT; PLANT GENOME; CHIP-SEQ; CHROMATIN IMMUNOPRECIPITATION AND SEQUENCING; CHROMATIN MODIFICATIONS; COMPUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; EPIGENETICS; H3K4ME3; PROTEIN BINDING; REVIEW; SMALL INTERFERENCE RNA; TRI-METHYLATIONS AT HISTONE H3 LYSINE 4;

CHROMATIN; CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY; DNA METHYLATION; ENVIRONMENT; EPIGENESIS, GENETIC; GENOME, PLANT; HISTONES; NUCLEOSOMES; PLANTS; PROTEIN BINDING;

CHIP-SEQ; CHROMATIN IMMUNOPRECIPITATION AND SEQUENCING; CHROMATIN MODIFICATIONS; CHROMATIN REMODELING; COMPUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; EPIGENOMICS; H3K4ME3; SIRNA; SMALL INTERFERENCE RNA; TRI-METHYLATIONS AT HISTONE H3 LYSINE 4;

EID: 84882687965     PISSN: 01689452     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2013.07.006     Document Type: Review

References (82)

1. Feng S., Jacobsen S.E., Reik W. Epigenetic reprogramming in plant and animal development. Science 2010, 330:622-627.
2. Talbert P.B., Henikoff S. Histone variants-ancient wrap artists of the epigenome, Nature reviews. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010, 11:264-275.
3. Deal R.B., Henikoff S. Histone variants and modifications in plant gene regulation. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2011, 14:116-122.
4. Clapier C.R., Cairns B.R. The biology of chromatin remodeling complexes. Annu. Rev. Biochem 2009, 78:273-304.
5. Knizewski L., Ginalski K., Jerzmanowski A. Snf2 proteins in plants: gene silencing and beyond. Trends Plant Sci. 2008, 13:557-565.
6. Baulcombe D. RNA silencing in plants. Nature 2004, 431:356-363.
7. Henderson I.R., Jacobsen S.E. Epigenetic inheritance in plants. Nature 2007, 447:418-424.
8. Waddington C.H. The epigenotype. Endeavour 1942, 1:18-20.
9. Berger S.L., Kouzarides T., Shiekhattar R., Shilatifard A. An operational definition of epigenetics. Genes & Development 2009, 23:781-783.
10. Roth S.Y., Denu J.M., Allis C.D. Histone acetyltransferases. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2001, 70:81-120.
11. Pandey R., et al. Analysis of histone acetyltransferase and histone deacetylase families of Arabidopsis thaliana suggests functional diversification of chromatin modification among multicellular eukaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30:5036-5055.
12. Brownell J.E., Allis C.D. Special HATs for special occasions: linking histone acetylation to chromatin assembly and gene activation. Current opinion in genetics & development 1996, 6:176-184.
13. Wittkopp P.J., Haerum B.K., Clark A.G. Evolutionary changes in cis and trans gene regulation. Nature 2004, 430:85-88.
14. Shi X., et al. Cis- and trans-regulatory divergence between progenitor species determines gene-expression novelty in Arabidopsis allopolyploids. Nat. Commun. 2012, 3:950.
15. Dowen R.H., et al. Widespread dynamic DNA methylation in response to biotic stress. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2012, 109:E2183-E2191.
16. Dennis E.S., Peacock W.J. Epigenetic regulation of flowering. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2007, 10:520-527.
17. Sung S., Amasino R.M. Vernalization in Arabidopsis thaliana is mediated by the PHD finger protein VIN3. Nature 2004, 427:159-164.
18. Bastow R., et al. Vernalization requires epigenetic silencing of FLC by histone methylation. Nature 2004, 427:164-167.
19. Dolinoy D.C., Huang D., Jirtle R.L. Maternal nutrient supplementation counteracts bisphenol A-induced DNA hypomethylation in early development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2007, 104:13056-13061.
20. Jirtle R.L., Skinner M.K. Environmental epigenomics and disease susceptibility. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2007, 8:253-262.
21. Hsieh T.F., et al. Genome-wide demethylation of Arabidopsis endosperm. Science 2009, 324:1451-1454.
22. Gehring M., Bubb K.L., Henikoff S. Extensive demethylation of repetitive elements during seed development underlies gene imprinting. Science 2009, 324:1447-1451.
23. Huh J.H., Bauer M.J., Hsieh T.F., Fischer R.L. Cellular programming of plant gene imprinting. Cell 2008, 132:735-744.
24. Kankel M.W., et al. Arabidopsis MET1 cytosine methyltransferase mutants. Genetics 2003, 163:1109-1122.
25. Lindroth A.M., et al. Requirement of CHROMOMETHYLASE3 for maintenance of CpXpG methylation. Science 2001, 292:2077-2080.
26. Saze H., Mittelsten Scheid O., Paszkowski J. Maintenance of CpG methylation is essential for epigenetic inheritance during plant gametogenesis. Nat. Genet. 2003, 34:65-69.
27. McClintock B. The significance of responses of the genome to challenge. Science 1984, 226:792-801.
28. Vrana P.B., et al. Genetic and epigenetic incompatibilities underlie hybrid dysgenesis in Peromyscus. Nat. Genet. 2000, 25:120-124.
29. Ha M., et al. Small RNAs serve as a genetic buffer against genomic shock in Arabidopsis interspecific hybrids and allopolyploids. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2009, 106:17835-17840.
30. Mosher R.A., et al. Uniparental expression of PolIV-dependent siRNAs in developing endosperm of Arabidopsis. Nature 2009, 460:283-286.
31. Moissiard G., et al. MORC family ATPases required for heterochromatin condensation and gene silencing. Science 2012, 336:1448-1451.
32. Zilberman D., Gehring M., Tran R.K., Ballinger T., Henikoff S. Genome-wide analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana DNA methylation uncovers an interdependence between methylation and transcription. Nat. Genet. 2007, 39:61-69.
33. Costas C., et al. Genome-wide mapping of Arabidopsis thaliana origins of DNA replication and their associated epigenetic marks. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2011, 18:395-400.
34. Jacob Y., et al. ATXR5 and ATXR6 are H3K27 monomethyltransferases required for chromatin structure and gene silencing. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2009, 16:763-768.
35. Ha M., Ng D.W., Li W.H., Chen Z.J. Coordinated histone modifications are associated with gene expression variation within and between species. Genome Res. 2011, 21:590-598.
36. Strahl B.D., Allis C.D. The language of covalent histone modifications. Nature 2000, 403:41-45.
37. Jenuwein T., Allis C.D. Translating the histone code. Science 2001, 293:1074-1080.
38. Zang C., et al. clustering approach for identification of enriched domains from histone modification ChIP-Seq data. Bioinformatics 2009, 25:1952-1958.
39. Bintu L. The elongation rate of RNA polymerase determines the fate of transcribed nucleosomes. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2011.
40. Li B., Carey M., Workman J.L. The role of chromatin during transcription. Cell 2007, 128:707-719.
41. Zhang W., Zhang T., Wu Y., Jiang J. Genome-Wide identification of regulatory DNA elements and protein-binding footprints using signatures of open chromatin in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2012, 24:2719-2731.
42. Roudier F., et al. Integrative epigenomic mapping defines four main chromatin states in Arabidopsis. EMBO J. 2011, 30:1928-1938.
43. Jacob Y., et al. Regulation of heterochromatic DNA replication by histone H3 lysine 27 methyltransferases. Nature 2010, 466:987-991.
44. Zhang X., Bernatavichute Y.V., Cokus S., Pellegrini M., Jacobsen S.E. Genome-wide analysis of mono-, di- and trimethylation of histone H3 lysine 4 in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genome Biol. 2009, 10:R62.
45. Xu L., et al. Di- and Tri- but not monomethylation on Histone H3 Lysine 36 marks active transcription of genes involved in flowering time regulation and other processes in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2008, 28:1348-1360.
46. Bratzel F., Lopez-Torrejon G., Koch M., Del Pozo J.C., Calonje M. Keeping cell identity in Arabidopsis requires PRC1 RING-finger homologs that catalyze H2A monoubiquitination. Curr. Biol. 2010, 20:1853-1859.
47. Molnar A., et al. Small silencing RNAs in plants are mobile and direct epigenetic modification in recipient cells. Science 2010, 328:872-875.
48. Wang Z., et al. Combinatorial patterns of histone acetylations and methylations in the human genome. Nat. Genet. 2008, 40:897-903.
49. Wang Z., et al. Genome-wide mapping of HATs and HDACs reveals distinct functions in active and inactive genes. Cell 2009, 138:1019-1031.
50. Matzke M., Kanno T., Daxinger L., Huettel B., Matzke A.J. RNA-mediated chromatin-based silencing in plants. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2009, 21:367-376.
51. He X.J., et al. An effector of RNA-directed DNA methylation in arabidopsis is an ARGONAUTE 4- and RNA-binding protein. Cell 2009, 137:498-508.
52. Wierzbicki A.T., Ream T.S., Haag J.R., Pikaard C.S. RNA polymerase V transcription guides ARGONAUTE4 to chromatin. Nat. Genet. 2009, 41:630-634.
53. Chodavarapu R.K., et al. Relationship between nucleosome positioning and DNA methylation. Nature 2010, 466:388-392.
54. Conerly M.L., et al. Changes in H2A.Z occupancy and DNA methylation during B-cell lymphomagenesis. Genome Res. 2010, 20:1383-1390.
55. Zilberman D., Coleman-Derr D., Ballinger T., Henikoff S. Histone H2A.Z and DNA methylation are mutually antagonistic chromatin marks. Nature 2008, 456:125-129.
56. Jin C., et al. H3.3/H2A.Z double variant-containing nucleosomes mark 'nucleosome-free regions' of active promoters and other regulatory regions. Nat. Genet. 2009, 41:941-945.
57. Veiseth S.V., et al. The SUVR4 histone lysine methyltransferase binds ubiquitin and converts H3K9me1 to H3K9me3 on transposon chromatin in Arabidopsis. PLoS. Genet 2011, 7:e1001325.
58. Shahbazian M.D., Zhang K., Grunstein M. Histone H2B ubiquitylation controls processive methylation but not monomethylation by Dot1 and Set1. Mol. Cell 2005, 19:271-277.
59. Shilatifard A. Chromatin modifications by methylation and ubiquitination: implications in the regulation of gene expression. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2006, 75:243-269.
60. Dion M.F., Kaplan T., Kim M., Buratowski S., Friedman N., Rando O.J. Dynamics of replication-independent histone turnover in budding yeast. Science 2007, 315:1405-1408.
61. Deal R.B., Henikoff J.G., Henikoff S. Genome-wide kinetics of nucleosome turnover determined by metabolic labeling of histones. Science 2010, 328:1161-1164.
62. Ernst J., et al. Mapping and analysis of chromatin state dynamics in nine human cell types. Nature 2011, 473:43-49.
63. Lien W.-H., et al. Genome-wide maps of histone modifications unwind in vivo chromatin states of the hair follicle lineage. Cell Stem Cell 2011, 9:219-232.
64. Heintzman N.D., et al. Histone modifications at human enhancers reflect global cell-type-specific gene expression. Nature 2009, 459:108-112.
65. He H.H., et al. Nucleosome dynamics define transcriptional enhancers. Nat. Genet. 2010, 42:343-347.
66. Creyghton M.P., et al. Histone H3K27ac separates active from poised enhancers and predicts developmental state. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci 2010, 107:21931-21936.
67. Yelina N.E., et al. Epigenetic remodeling of meiotic crossover frequency in Arabidopsis thaliana DNA methyltransferase mutants. PLoS. Genet. 2012, 8:e1002844.
68. Smagulova F., et al. Genome-wide analysis reveals novel molecular features of mouse recombination hotspots. Nature 2011, 472:375-378.
69. Maunakea A.K., et al. Conserved role of intragenic DNA methylation in regulating alternative promoters. Nature 2010, 466:253-257.
70. Wang J., Tian L., Lee H.S., Chen Z.J. Nonadditive regulation of FRI and FLC loci mediates flowering-time variation in Arabidopsis allopolyploids. Genetics 2006, 173:965-974.
71. Ni Z., et al. Altered circadian rhythms regulate growth vigour in hybrids and allopolyploids. Nature 2009, 457:327-331.
72. Tan M., et al. Identification of 67 histone marks and histone lysine crotonylation as a new type of histone modification. Cell 2011, 146:1016-1028.
73. Vafabakhsh R., Ha T. Extreme bendability of DNA less than 100 base pairs long revealed by single-molecule cyclization. Science 2012, 337:1097-1101.
74. Segal E., et al. A genomic code for nucleosome positioning. Nature 2006, 442:772-778.
75. Struhl K. Naturally occurring poly(dA-dT) sequences are upstream promoter elements for constitutive transcription in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1985, 82:8419-8423.
76. Thomson J.P., et al. CpG islands influence chromatin structure via the CpG-binding protein Cfp1. Nature 2010, 464:1082-1086.
77. Baudat F., et al. PRDM9 is a major determinant of meiotic recombination hotspots in humans and mice. Science 2010, 327:836-840.
78. Myers S., Bottolo L., Freeman C., McVean G., Donnelly P. A fine-scale map of recombination rates and hotspots across the human genome. Science 2005, 310:321-324.
79. Parvanov E.D., Petkov P.M., Paigen K. Prdm9 controls activation of mammalian recombination hotspots. Science 2010, 327:835.
80. Zentner G.E., Henikoff S. Regulation of nucleosome dynamics by histone modifications. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2013, 20:259-266.
81. Ha M., Hong S., Li W.H. Predicting the probability of H3K4me3 occupation at a base pair from the genome sequence context. Bioinformatics 2013.
82. Eichler E.E., et al. Missing heritability and strategies for finding the underlying causes of complex disease. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2010, 11:446-450.