ITRAQ proteome analysis reflects a progressed differentiation state of epiblast derived versus inner cell mass derived murine embryonic stem cells

Journal of Proteomics

Volumn 90, Issue , 2013, Pages 38-51

  Fröhlich, Thomas ^a   Kösters, Miwako ^a   Graf, Alexander ^a   Wolf, Eckhard ^a   Kobolak, Julianna ^b   Brochard, Vincent ^e   Dinnyés, András ^b,c,d   Jouneau, Alice ^e   Arnold, Georg J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b BIOTALENTUM LTD   (Hungary)

^c SZENT ISTVÁN UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

^d UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^e INRA Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique   (France)

Author keywords

Embryonic stem cells; Epiblast stem cells; ITRAQ; Mass spectrometry; Pluripotency

Indexed keywords

ALPHA TROPOMYOSIN; CYTOSKELETON PROTEIN; DNA (CYTOSINE 5) METHYLTRANSFERASE; FILAMIN A; INTERMEDIATE FILAMENT PROTEIN; MYOSIN; MYOSIN HEAVY CHAIN; NESTIN; OCTAMER TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR 4; PROTEIN MSH2; PROTEIN MSH6; VIMENTIN; VINCULIN; DNA BINDING PROTEIN; DNMT3L PROTEIN, MOUSE; HOMEODOMAIN PROTEIN; MSH2 PROTEIN, MOUSE; MSH6 PROTEIN, MOUSE; NANOG PROTEIN, MOUSE; NUCLEAR PROTEIN; POU5F1 PROTEIN, MOUSE; PROTEOME; REPRESSOR PROTEIN; TRIM28 PROTEIN, MOUSE;

ACTIN FILAMENT; ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL DEDIFFERENTIATION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL NUCLEUS TRANSPLANTATION; COLLISIONALLY ACTIVATED DISSOCIATION; CYTOLYSIS; DEVELOPMENTAL STAGE; DNA METHYLATION; DNA REPAIR; ECTODERM; ELECTROSPRAY; EMBRYO; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; EPITHELIAL MESENCHYMAL TRANSITION; FEEDER CELL; FERTILIZATION; FOCAL ADHESION; INNER CELL MASS; INTERMEDIATE FILAMENT; INTRACELLULAR TRANSPORT; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MISMATCH REPAIR; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SOMATIC CELL; ANIMAL; CELL LINE; CYTOLOGY; GERM LAYER; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; PROTEOMICS;

MURINAE;

ANIMALS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL LINE; DNA (CYTOSINE-5-)-METHYLTRANSFERASE; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS; GERM LAYERS; HOMEODOMAIN PROTEINS; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MICE; MUTS HOMOLOG 2 PROTEIN; NUCLEAR PROTEINS; OCTAMER TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR-3; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELLS; PROTEOME; PROTEOMICS; REPRESSOR PROTEINS;

EID: 84882656342     PISSN: 18743919     EISSN: 18767737     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2013.03.015     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Evans M.J., Kaufman M.H. Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos. Nature 1981, 292:154-156.
2. Martin G.R. Isolation of a pluripotent cell line from early mouse embryos cultured in medium conditioned by teratocarcinoma stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1981, 78:7634-7638.
3. Thomson J.A., Itskovitz-Eldor J., Shapiro S.S., Waknitz M.A., Swiergiel J.J., Marshall V.S., et al. Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science 1998, 282:1145-1147.
4. Brons I.G., Smithers L.E., Trotter M.W., Rugg-Gunn P., Sun B., Chuva de Sousa Lopes S.M., et al. Derivation of pluripotent epiblast stem cells from mammalian embryos. Nature 2007, 448:191-195.
5. Tesar P.J., Chenoweth J.G., Brook F.A., Davies T.J., Evans E.P., Mack D.L., et al. New cell lines from mouse epiblast share defining features with human embryonic stem cells. Nature 2007, 448:196-199.
6. Huang Y., Osorno R., Tsakiridis A., Wilson V. In Vivo differentiation potential of epiblast stem cells revealed by chimeric embryo formation. Cell Rep 2012, 2:1571-1578.
7. Pauklin S., Pedersen R.A., Vallier L. Mouse pluripotent stem cells at a glance. J Cell Sci 2011, 124:3727-3732.
8. Nichols J., Smith A. Naive and primed pluripotent states. Cell Stem Cell 2009, 4:487-492.
9. Rugg-Gunn P.J., Cox B.J., Lanner F., Sharma P., Ignatchenko V., McDonald A.C., et al. Cell-surface proteomics identifies lineage-specific markers of embryo-derived stem cells. Dev Cell 2012, 22:887-901.
10. Song J., Saha S., Gokulrangan G., Tesar P.J., Ewing R.M. DNA and chromatin modification networks distinguish stem cell pluripotent ground States. Mol Cell Proteomics 2012, 11:1036-1047.
11. Muller F.J., Laurent L.C., Kostka D., Ulitsky I., Williams R., Lu C., et al. Regulatory networks define phenotypic classes of human stem cell lines. Nature 2008, 455:401-405.
12. Som A., Harder C., Greber B., Siatkowski M., Paudel Y., Warsow G., et al. The PluriNetWork: an electronic representation of the network underlying pluripotency in mouse, and its applications. PLoS One 2010, 5:e15165.
13. Brambrink T., Hochedlinger K., Bell G., Jaenisch R. ES cells derived from cloned and fertilized blastocysts are transcriptionally and functionally indistinguishable. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006, 103:933-938.
14. Wakayama S., Jakt M.L., Suzuki M., Araki R., Hikichi T., Kishigami S., et al. Equivalency of nuclear transfer-derived embryonic stem cells to those derived from fertilized mouse blastocysts. Stem Cells 2006, 24:2023-2033.
15. Ding J., Guo Y., Liu S., Yan Y., Chang G., Kou Z., et al. Embryonic stem cells derived from somatic cloned and fertilized blastocysts are post-transcriptionally indistinguishable: a microRNA and protein profile comparison. Proteomics 2009, 9:2711-2721.
16. Maruotti J., Dai X.P., Brochard V., Jouneau L., Liu J., Bonnet-Garnier A., et al. Nuclear transfer-derived epiblast stem cells are transcriptionally and epigenetically distinguishable from their fertilized-derived counterparts. Stem Cells 2010, 28:743-752.
17. Kobolak J., Bodo S., Rungsiwiwut R., Meng Q., Adorjan M., Virutamasen P., et al. Generation of mouse embryonic stem cell lines from zona-free nuclear transfer embryos. Cell Reprogram 2010, 12:105-113.
18. Bradford M.M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 1976, 72:248-254.
19. Huang da W., Sherman B.T., Lempicki R.A. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc 2009, 4:44-57.
20. Bindea G., Mlecnik B., Hackl H., Charoentong P., Tosolini M., Kirilovsky A., et al. ClueGO: a Cytoscape plug-in to decipher functionally grouped gene ontology and pathway annotation networks. Bioinformatics 2009, 25:1091-1093.
21. Ross P.L., Huang Y.N., Marchese J.N., Williamson B., Parker K., Hattan S., et al. Multiplexed protein quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using amine-reactive isobaric tagging reagents. Mol Cell Proteomics 2004, 3:1154-1169.
22. Elias J.E., Haas W., Faherty B.K., Gygi S.P. Comparative evaluation of mass spectrometry platforms used in large-scale proteomics investigations. Nat Methods 2005, 2:667-675.
23. Keller A., Nesvizhskii A.I., Kolker E., Aebersold R. Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search. Anal Chem 2002, 74:5383-5392.
24. Lu R., Markowetz F., Unwin R.D., Leek J.T., Airoldi E.M., MacArthur B.D., et al. Systems-level dynamic analyses of fate change in murine embryonic stem cells. Nature 2009, 462:358-362.
25. Chenau J., Michelland S., Sidibe J., Seve M. Peptides OFFGEL electrophoresis: a suitable pre-analytical step for complex eukaryotic samples fractionation compatible with quantitative iTRAQ labeling. Proteome Sci 2008, 6:9.
26. Gowher H., Liebert K., Hermann A., Xu G., Jeltsch A. Mechanism of stimulation of catalytic activity of Dnmt3A and Dnmt3B DNA-(cytosine-C5)-methyltransferases by Dnmt3L. J Biol Chem 2005, 280:13341-13348.
27. Suetake I., Shinozaki F., Miyagawa J., Takeshima H., Tajima S. DNMT3L stimulates the DNA methylation activity of Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b through a direct interaction. J Biol Chem 2004, 279:27816-27823.
28. Chedin F., Lieber M.R., Hsieh C.L. The DNA methyltransferase-like protein DNMT3L stimulates de novo methylation by Dnmt3a. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002, 99:16916-16921.
29. Li J.Y., Pu M.T., Hirasawa R., Li B.Z., Huang Y.N., Zeng R., et al. Synergistic function of DNA methyltransferases Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b in the methylation of Oct4 and Nanog. Mol Cell Biol 2007, 27:8748-8759.
30. Kellner S., Kikyo N. Transcriptional regulation of the Oct4 gene, a master gene for pluripotency. Histol Histopathol 2010, 25:405-412.
31. Hu Y.-G., Hirasawa R., Hu J.-L., Hata K., Li C.-L., Jin Y., et al. Regulation of DNA methylation activity through Dnmt3L promoter methylation by Dnmt3 enzymes in embryonic development. Hum Mol Genet 2008, 17:2654-2664.
32. Senner C.E., Krueger F., Oxley D., Andrews S., Hemberger M. DNA methylation profiles define stem cell identity and reveal a tight embryonic-extraembryonic lineage boundary. Stem Cells 2012, 30:2732-2745.
33. Niwa H. How is pluripotency determined and maintained?. Development 2007, 134:635-646.
34. Boiani M., Scholer H.R. Regulatory networks in embryo-derived pluripotent stem cells. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2005, 6:872-884.
35. Pesce M., Scholer H.R. Oct-4: gatekeeper in the beginnings of mammalian development. Stem Cells 2001, 19:271-278.
36. Niwa H., Miyazaki J., Smith A.G. Quantitative expression of Oct-3/4 defines differentiation, dedifferentiation or self-renewal of ES cells. Nat Genet 2000, 24:372-376.
37. Descalzo S.M., Rue P., Garcia-Ojalvo J., Arias A.M. Correlations between the levels of Oct4 and Nanog as a signature for naive pluripotency in mouse ES cells. Stem Cells 2012, 30:2683-2691.
38. Adams I.R., McLaren A. Identification and characterisation of mRif1: a mouse telomere-associated protein highly expressed in germ cells and embryo-derived pluripotent stem cells. Dev Dyn 2004, 229:733-744.
39. Wang J., Rao S., Chu J., Shen X., Levasseur D.N., Theunissen T.W., et al. A protein interaction network for pluripotency of embryonic stem cells. Nature 2006, 444:364-368.
40. Loh Y.H., Wu Q., Chew J.L., Vega V.B., Zhang W., Chen X., et al. The Oct4 and Nanog transcription network regulates pluripotency in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nat Genet 2006, 38:431-440.
41. Cornacchia D., Dileep V., Quivy J.-P., Foti R., Tili F., Santarella-Mellwig R., et al. Mouse Rif1 is a key regulator of the replication-timing programme in mammalian cells. EMBO J 2012, 31:3678-3690.
42. Seki Y., Kurisaki A., Watanabe-Susaki K., Nakajima Y., Nakanishi M., Arai Y., et al. TIF1beta regulates the pluripotency of embryonic stem cells in a phosphorylation-dependent manner. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010, 107:10926-10931.
43. Cervantes R.B., Stringer J.R., Shao C., Tischfield J.A., Stambrook P.J. Embryonic stem cells and somatic cells differ in mutation frequency and type. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002, 99:3586-3590.
44. Tichy E.D., Liang L., Deng L., Tischfield J., Schwemberger S., Babcock G., et al. Mismatch and base excision repair proficiency in murine embryonic stem cells. DNA Repair 2011, 10:445-451.
45. Coll J.L., Ben-Ze'ev A., Ezzell R.M., Rodriguez Fernandez J.L., Baribault H., Oshima R.G., et al. Targeted disruption of vinculin genes in F9 and embryonic stem cells changes cell morphology, adhesion, and locomotion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1995, 92:9161-9165.
46. Zhou A.X., Hartwig J.H., Akyurek L.M. Filamins in cell signaling, transcription and organ development. Trends Cell Biol 2010, 20:113-123.
47. van der Flier A., Sonnenberg A. Structural and functional aspects of filamins. Biochim Biophys Acta 2001, 1538:99-117.
48. Gunning P., O'Neill G., Hardeman E. Tropomyosin-based regulation of the actin cytoskeleton in time and space. Physiol Rev 2008, 88:1-35.
49. Ohgushi M., Sasai Y. Lonely death dance of human pluripotent stem cells: ROCKing between metastable cell states. Trends Cell Biol 2011, 21:274-282.
50. Watanabe K., Ueno M., Kamiya D., Nishiyama A., Matsumura M., Wataya T., et al. A ROCK inhibitor permits survival of dissociated human embryonic stem cells. Nat Biotechnol 2007, 25:681-686.
51. Park D., Xiang A.P., Mao F.F., Zhang L., Di C.G., Liu X.M., et al. Nestin is required for the proper self-renewal of neural stem cells. Stem Cells 2010, 28:2162-2171.
52. Wiese C., Rolletschek A., Kania G., Blyszczuk P., Tarasov K.V., Tarasova Y., et al. Nestin expression - a property of multi-lineage progenitor cells?. Cell Mol Life Sci 2004, 61:2510-2522.
53. Arnold S.J., Robertson E.J. Making a commitment: cell lineage allocation and axis patterning in the early mouse embryo. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2009, 10:91-103.
54. Camus A., Perea-Gomez A., Moreau A., Collignon J. Absence of Nodal signaling promotes precocious neural differentiation in the mouse embryo. Dev Biol 2006, 295:743-755.
55. Kobolak J., Horsch M., Geissler S., Mamo S., Beckers J., Dinnyes A. Comparative analysis of nuclear transfer embryo-derived mouse embryonic stem cells. Part II: gene regulation. Cell Reprogram 2012, 14:68-78.
56. Kobolak J., Mamo S., Rungsiwiwut R., Ujhelly O., Csonka E., Hadlaczky G., et al. Comparative analysis of nuclear transfer embryo-derived mouse embryonic stem cells. Part I: cellular characterization. Cell Reprogram 2012, 14:56-67.