Appreciation of cleft lip and palate treatment outcome by professionals and laypeople

European Journal of Orthodontics

Volumn 34, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 553-560

  Papamanou, Despina A ^a   Gkantidis, Nikolaos ^b   Topouzelis, Nikolaos ^c   Christou, Panagiotis ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

^c ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CEPHALOMETRY; CLEFT LIP; CLEFT PALATE; ESTHETICS; FACE; FEMALE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; MALE; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PHOTOGRAPHY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CEPHALOMETRY; CLEFT LIP; CLEFT PALATE; ESTHETICS; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTOGRAPHY; QUESTIONNAIRES; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84866993964     PISSN: 01415387     EISSN: 14602210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjr073     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Aitken R C 1969 Measurement of feelings using visual analogue scales. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine 62: 989-993
2. Anderson S L, Adams G, Plaut V C 2008 The cultural grounding of personal relationship: the importance of attractiveness in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 95: 352-368
3. Asher-McDade C, Roberts C, Shaw W C, Gallager C 1991 Development of a method for rating nasolabial appearance in patients with clefts of the lip and palate. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal 28: 385-391
4. Broder H L, Smith F B, Strauss R P 1992 Habilitation of patients with clefts: parent and child ratings of satisfaction with appearance and speech. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal 29: 262-267
5. Broder H L, Smith F B, Strauss R P 1994 Effects of visible and invisible orofacial defects on self-perception and adjustment across developmental eras and gender. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal 31: 429-436 (Pubitemid 24367047)
6. De Smit A, Dermaut L 1984 Soft-tissue profile preference. American Journal of Orthodontics 86: 67-73
7. Fabré M, Mossaz C, Christou P, Kiliaridis S 2010 Professionals' and laypersons' appreciation of various options for Class III surgical correction. European Journal of Orthodontics 32: 395-402
8. Friede H, Katsaros C 1998 Current knowledge in cleft lip and palate treatment from an orthodontist's point of view. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics 59: 313-330
9. Friedman M 1940 A comparison of alternative tests of significance for the problem of m rankings. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 11: 86-92
10. Grant S et al. 1999 A comparison of the reproducibility and the sensitivity to change of visual analogue scales, Borg scales, and Likert scales in normal subjects during submaximal exercise. Chest 116: 1208-1217 (Pubitemid 29535970)
11. Grossman S A, Sheidler V R, McGuire D B, Geer C, Santor D, Piantadosi S 1992 A comparison of the Hopkins Pain Rating Instrument with standard visual analogue and verbal descriptor scales in patients with cancer pain. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 7: 196-203
12. Houston W J B 1983 The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements. American Journal of Orthodontics 83: 382-390
13. Hunt O, Burden D, Hepper P, Stevenson M, Johnston C 2006 Self-reports of psychosocial functioning among children and young adults with cleft lip and palate. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal 43: 598-605 (Pubitemid 44413683)
14. Knutsson I, Rydström H, Reimer J, Nyberg P, Hagell P 2010 Interpretation of response categories in patient-reported rating scales: a controlled study among people with Parkinson's disease. Health and Quality Life Outcomes 8: 61
15. Lo L J, Wong F H, Mardini S, Chen Y R, Noordhoff M S 2002 Assessment of bilateral cleft lip nose deformity: a comparison of results as judged by cleft surgeons and laypersons. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 110: 733-738 (Pubitemid 34855933)
16. Marcusson A, Paulin G, Ostrup L 2002 Facial appearance in adults who had cleft lip and palate treated in childhood. Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery 36: 16-23 (Pubitemid 34203112)
17. Morrant D G, Shaw W C 1996 Use of standardised video recordings to assess cleft surgery outcome. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal 33: 134-142 (Pubitemid 26088250)
18. McLaughlin K, Ainslie M, Coderre S, Wright B, Violato C 2009 The effect of differential rater function over time (DRIFT) on objective structured clinical examination ratings. Medical Education 43: 989-992
19. Meyer-Marcotty P, Stellzig-Eisenhauer A 2009 Dentofacial self-perception and social perception of adults with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics 70: 224-236
20. Noor S N, Musa S 2007 Assessment of patients' level of satisfaction with cleft treatment using the Cleft Evaluation Profile. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal 44: 292-303 (Pubitemid 46744226)
21. Oosterkamp B C et al. 2007 Satisfaction with treatment outcome in bilateral cleft lip and palate patients. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 36: 890-895 (Pubitemid 47535111)
22. Peerlings R H, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Hoeksma J B 1995 Aphotographic scale to measure facial aesthetics. European Journal of Orthodontics 17: 101-109
23. Pitak-Arnnop P, Hemprich A, Dhanuthai K, Yildirim V, Pausch N C 2010 Panel and patient perceptions of nasal aesthetics after secondary cleft rhinoplasty with versus without columellar grafting. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery Sep 8: [Epub ahead of print]
24. Rhodes G 2006 The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annual Review of Psychology 57: 199-226 (Pubitemid 43237232)
25. Ritter K, Trotman C A, Phillips C 2002 Validity of subjective evaluations for the assessment of lip scarring and impairment. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal 39: 587-596 (Pubitemid 35285585)
26. Rumsey N, Bull R, Gahagan D 1986 A developmental study of children's stereotyping of facially deformed adults. British Journal of Psychology 77: 269-274
27. Russell K A, Orthod D, Tompson B, Orthod D, Paedo D 2009 Correlation between facial morphology and esthetics in patients with repaired complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal 46: 319-325
28. Schmitt N 1996 Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psychological Assessment 8: 350-353
29. Shaw W C 1981 Factors influencing the desire for orthodontic treatment. European Journal of Orthodontics 3: 151-162 (Pubitemid 11003383)
30. Sinko K, Jagsch R, Prechtl V, Watzinger F, Hollmann K, Baumann A 2005 Evaluation of esthetic, functional, and quality-of-life outcome in adult cleft lip and palate patients. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal 42: 355-361 (Pubitemid 40994527)
31. Strauss R P, Broder H, Helms R W 1988 Perceptions of appearance and speech by adolescent patients with cleft lip and palate and by their parents. The Cleft Palate Journal 25: 335-342
32. Svensson E 2000 Concordance between ratings using different scales for the same variable. Statistics in Medicine 19: 3483-3496 (Pubitemid 32056698)
33. Thomas PT, Turner S R, Rumsey N, Dowell T, Sandy J R 1997 Satisfaction with facial appearance among subjects affected by a cleft. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal 34: 226-231 (Pubitemid 27220842)
34. Tobiasen J M, Hiebert J M, Boraz R A 1991 Development of scales of severity of facial cleft impairment. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal 28: 419-424
35. Turner S R, Rumsey N, Sandy J R 1998 Psychological aspects of cleft lip and palate. European Journal of Orthodontics 20: 407-415 (Pubitemid 128491546)
36. Van der Linden F P G M, Boersma H 1987 Diagnostic aids. In: Van der Linden F P, Boersma H, Van der Linden F P G M. (eds). Diagnosis and treatment planning in dentofacial orthopaedics. Quintessence Publishing Co. Ltd., London, pp. 91-115
37. Wilcoxon F 1945 Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometrics 1: 80-83
38. Williamson A, Hoggart B 2005 Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales. Journal of Clinical Nursing 14: 798-804 (Pubitemid 41018435)