A comparison of providers' and consumers' perceptions of facial-profile attractiveness

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 128, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 690-696

  Maple, Jenny R ^a   Vig, Katherine W L ^a,b   Beck, F Michael ^a   Larsen, Peter E ^a   Shanker, Shiva ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Section of Restorative and Prosthetic Dentistry   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; DENTIST; ESTHETICS; FACE; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MEDICAL PHOTOGRAPHY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATIENT; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REPRODUCIBILITY; UNITED STATES;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BEAUTY; CEPHALOMETRY; DENTISTS; ESTHETICS, DENTAL; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS II; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS III; OBSERVER VARIATION; OHIO; PATIENTS; PERCEPTION; PHOTOGRAPHY, DENTAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 29144468318     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.09.030     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. N.H. Cox, F.P. van der Linden Facial harmony Am J Orthod 60 1971 175 183
2. E.J. Foster Profile preferences among diversified groups Angle Orthod 43 1973 34 40
3. K.L. Romani, F. Agahi, R. Nanda, J.H. Zernik Evaluation of horizontal and vertical differences in facial profiles by orthodontists and lay people Angle Orthod 63 1993 175 182
4. D.C. Baldwin Appearance and aesthetics in oral health Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 9 1980 244 256
5. P. Kilpelanien, C. Phillips, J.F.C. Tulloch Anterior tooth position and motivation for early treatment Angle Orthod 63 1993 171 174
6. D. Laufer, D. Glick, D. Gutman, A. Sharon Patient motivation and response to surgical correction of prognathism J Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 41 1976 309 313
7. A. Jacobson Psychological aspects of dentofacial esthetics and orthognathic surgery Angle Orthod 54 1984 18 35
8. C.M. Flanary, G.M. Barnwell, J.M. Alexander Patient perceptions of orthognathic surgery Am J Orthod 88 1985 137 145
9. K.H. Mayo, K.W.L. Dryland-Vig, P.S. Vig, C.J. Kowalski Attitude variables of dentofacial deformity patients demographic characteristics and associations J Oral Maxillofac Surg 49 1991 594 602
10. R.A. Riedel Esthetics and its relation to orthodontic therapy Angle Orthod 20 1950 168 178
11. H. Peck, S. Peck A concept of facial esthetics Angle Orthod 40 1970 284 317
12. W.R. Proffit, C. Phillips, N. Douvartzidis A comparison of outcomes of orthodontic and surgical-orthodontic treatment of Class II malocclusion in adults Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 101 1992 556 565
13. R.A. Riedel An analysis of dentofacial relationships Am J Orthod 43 1957 103 119
14. H.A. Dunlevy, R.P. White, W.R. Proffit, T.A. Turvey Professional and lay judgment of facial esthetic changes following orthognathic surgery Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 2 1987 151 158
15. W.J.S. Kerr, J.M. O'Donnell Panel perception of facial attractiveness Br J Orthod 17 1990 299 304
16. A.D. Shelly, T.E. Southard, K.A. Southard, J.S. Casko, J.R. Jakobsen, K.L. Fridrich Evaluation of profile esthetic change with mandibular advancement surgery Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 117 2000 630 637
17. P.A. Lines, R.R. Lines, C.A. Lines Profilemetrics and facial esthetics Am J Orthod 73 1978 648 657
18. B. Prahl-Andersen, H. Boersma, F.P.G.M. van der Linden, A.W. Moore Perceptions of dento-facial morphology by lay persons, general dentists, and orthodontists J Am Dent Assoc 98 1979 209 212
19. R. Bell, H.A. Kiyak, D.R. Joondeph, R.W. McNeill, T.R. Wallen Perceptions of facial profile and their influence on the decision to undergo orthognathic surgery Am J Orthod 88 1985 323 332
20. S.M. Cochrane, S.J. Cunningham, N.P. Hunt A comparison of the perception of facial profiles by the general public and 3 groups of clinicians Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 14 1999 291 295
21. A. DeSmit, L. Dermaut Soft-tissue profile preference Am J Orthod 86 1984 67 73
22. H.A. Kiyak, D.L. Zeitler Self-assessment of profile and body image among orthognathic surgery patients before and two years after surgery J Oral Maxillofac Surg 46 1988 365 371
23. M.C. Kinnebrew, D.R. Hoffman, D.M. Carlton Projecting the soft-tissue outcome of surgical and orthodontic manipulation of the maxillofacial skeleton Am J Orthod 84 1983 508 519
24. R.G. Burcal, D.M. Laskin, T.P. Sperry Recognition of profile changes after simulated orthognathic surgery J Oral Maxillofac Surg 45 1987 666 670
25. M. Raj The perception of facial profile attractiveness by providers and consumers 2002 Ohio State University Columbus [thesis]
26. D.J. Howells, W.C. Shaw The validity and reliability of ratings of dental and facial attractiveness for epidemiologic use Am J Orthod 88 1985 402 408
27. J.M. Tobiasen, J.M. Hiebert Reliability of esthetic ratings of cleft impairment Cleft Palate J 25 1988 313 317
28. K. O'Neill, M. Harkness, R. Knight Ratings of profile attractiveness in a sample of white women Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 9 1994 95 103
29. B.W. Baker, M.G. Woods The role of the divine proportion in the esthetic improvement of patients undergoing combined orthodontic/orthognathic surgical treatment Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 16 2001 108 120
30. R.C.B. Aitken Measurement of feelings using visual analogue scales Proc R Soc Med 62 1969 17 21
31. C. Phillips, T. Griffin, E. Bennett Perception of facial attractiveness by patients, peers, and professionals Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 10 1995 127 135
32. C. Phillips, C.J. Trentini, N. Douvartzidis The effect of treatment on facial attractiveness J Oral Maxillofac Surg 50 1992 590 594
33. C.J. Burstone The integumental contour and extension patterns Angle Orthod 29 1958 93 104
34. G.R. Kast Perception of facial profile esthetics by providers and consumers with incremental alterations to the mandible 1997 Ohio State University Columbus [thesis]
35. G. Michiels, A.H. Sather Determinants of facial attractiveness in a sample of white women Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 9 1994 95 103
36. S.M. Cochrane, S.J. Cunningham, N.P. Hunt Perceptions of facial appearance by orthodontists and the general public J Clin Orthod 31 1997 164 168
37. S.T. Czarnecki, R.S. Nanda, G.F. Currier Perceptions of a balanced facial profile Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 104 1993 180 187
38. M.N. Spyropoulos, D.J. Halazonetis Significance of soft tissue profile on facial esthetics Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 119 2001 464 471
39. J. Udry Structural correlates of feminine beauty preference in Britain and the U.S. a comparison Sociol Soc Res 49 1965 330 342
40. G.R. Adams, S.M. Crossman Physical attractiveness a cultural imperative 1978 Libra Roslyn Heights, NY
41. M. Ewing, R.B. Ross Soft tissue response to mandibular advancement and genioplasty Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 101 1992 550 555