Nasolabial appearance in adults with repaired unilateral cleft lip and palate: Relation between professional and lay rating and patients' satisfaction

Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery

Volumn 44, Issue 4-5, 2010, Pages 191-198

  Mani, Maria R ^a   Semb, Gunvor ^b   Andlin Sobocki, Anna ^c  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^c Craniofacial Team   (Sweden)

Author keywords

cleft lip and palate; evaluation; nasolabial appearance; panel judgement; patient satisfaction; Photography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; CLEFT LIP; CLEFT PALATE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; ESTHETICS; EVALUATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; JOB SATISFACTION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PLASTIC SURGERY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SATISFACTION; SELF EVALUATION; SEX DIFFERENCE; STATISTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CLEFT LIP; CLEFT PALATE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; ESTHETICS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; JOB SATISFACTION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERSONAL SATISFACTION; QUESTIONNAIRES; RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; SELF-ASSESSMENT; SEX FACTORS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79951777670     PISSN: 2000656X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/02844311.2010.499671     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Marcusson A, Paulin G, Ostrup L. Facial appearance in adults who had cleft lip and palate treated in childhood. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 2002;36:16-23. (Pubitemid 34203112)
2. Mani M, Morén S, Thorvardsson O, Jakobsson O, Skoog V, Holmström M. Objective assessment of the nasal airway in unilateral cleft lip and palate - a long-term study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2010;47:217-24.
3. Semb G, Brattstrom V, Molsted K, et al. The Eurocleft study: intercenter study of treatment outcome in patients with complete cleft lip and palate. Part 4: relationship among treatment outcome, patient/parent satisfaction, and the burden of care. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2005;42:83-92. (Pubitemid 40129741)
4. Chuo CB, Searle Y, Jeremy A, Richard BM, Sharp I, Slator R. The continuing multidisciplinary needs of adult patients with cleft lip and/or palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2008;45:633-8.
5. Tobiasen JM, Hiebert JM. Clefting and psychosocial adjustment. Influence of facial aesthetics. Clin Plast Surg 1993;20: 623-31. (Pubitemid 23317014)
6. Asher-McDade C, Roberts C, Shaw WC, Gallager C. Development of a method for rating nasolabial appearance in patients with clefts of the lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1991;28:385-91.
7. Al-Omari I, Millett DT, Ayoub AF. Methods of assessment of cleft-related facial deformity: a review. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2005;42:145-56. (Pubitemid 40354547)
8. Nollet PJ, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Chatzigianni A, et al. Nasolabial appearance in unilateral cleft lip, alveolus and palate: a comparison with Eurocleft. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2007; 35:278-86. (Pubitemid 47535116)
9. Fudalej P, Katsaros C, Bongaarts C, Dudkiewicz Z, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. Nasolabial esthetics in children with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate after 1- versus 3-stage treatment protocols. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;67: 1661-6.
10. Brattstrom V, Molsted K, Prahl-Andersen B, Semb G, Shaw WC. The Eurocleft study: intercenter study of treatment outcome in patients with complete cleft lip and palate. Part 2: craniofacial form and nasolabial appearance. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2005;42:69-77. (Pubitemid 40129739)
11. Asher-McDade C, Brattstrom V, Dahl E, et al. A six-center international study of treatment outcome in patients with clefts of the lip and palate: Part 4. Assessment of nasolabial appearance. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1992;29:409-12.
12. Farkas LG, Hajnis K, Posnick JC. Anthropometric and anthroposcopic findings of the nasal and facial region in cleft patients before and after primary lip and palate repair. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1993;30:1-12. (Pubitemid 23060692)
13. Al-Omari I, Millett DT, Ayoub A, et al. An appraisal of three methods of rating facial deformity in patients with repaired complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2003;40:530-7. (Pubitemid 37129473)
14. Williams AC, Bearn D, Mildinhall S, et al. Cleft lip and palate care in the United Kingdom - the Clinical Standards Advisory Group (CSAG) Study. Part 2: dentofacial outcomes and patient satisfaction. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2001;38:24-9. (Pubitemid 32436172)
15. Cussons PD, Murison MS, Fernandez AE, Pigott RW. A panel based assessment of early versus no nasal correction of the cleft lip nose. Br J Plast Surg 1993;46:7-12. (Pubitemid 23036342)
16. Roberts-Harry D, Stephens CD. Panel perception of facial attractiveness. Br J Orthod 1991;18:152-3.
17. Eliason MJ, Hardin MA, Olin WH. Factors that influence ratings of facial appearance for children with cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1991;28:190-4.
18. Shaw WC, Asher-McDade C, Brattstrom V, et al. A six- center international study of treatment outcome in patients with clefts of the lip and palate: Part 1. Principles and study design. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1992;29:393-7.
19. Skoog T. A design for the repair of unilateral cleft lips. Am J Surg 1958;95:223-6.
20. Jakobsson OP, Pontén B. Closure of the cleft palate in one or two stages: the surgical methods. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1990;24:149-55. (Pubitemid 20316204)
21. Thomas PT, Turner SR, Rumsey N, Dowell T, Sandy JR. Satisfaction with facial appearance among subjects affected by a cleft. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1997;34:226-31. (Pubitemid 27220842)
22. Noor SN, Musa S. Assessment of patients' level of satisfaction with cleft treatment using the Cleft Evaluation Profile. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2007;44:292-303. (Pubitemid 46744226)
23. Feragen KB, Borge AI, Rumsey N. Social experience in 10-year-old children born with a cleft: exploring psychosocial resilience. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2009;46:65-74.
24. Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman and Hall; 1991. p 611.