The Eurocleft study: Intercenter study of treatment outcome in patients with complete cleft lip and palate. Part 2: Craniofacial form and nasolabial appearance

Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 69-77

  Brattström, Viveca ^a   Mølsted, Kirsten ^b   Prahl Andersen, Birte ^c   Semb, Gunvor ^d,e,f   Shaw, William C ^f  

^a Eastman Dental Institute Stockholm   (Sweden)

^b Cleft Palate Department   (Denmark)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^d OSLO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^e UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^f UNIVERSITY DENTAL HOSPITAL OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cephalometrics; Cohort study; Complete unilateral cleft lip and palate; Longitudinal study; Nasolabial appearance

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; CLEFT LIP; CLEFT PALATE; COHORT ANALYSIS; EUROPE; FACIES; HUMAN; LIP; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NOSE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCHOOL CHILD; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADOLESCENT; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; CLEFT LIP; CLEFT PALATE; DENTAL OCCLUSION; EUROPE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LIP; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MAXILLOFACIAL DEVELOPMENT; NOSE; ODDS RATIO; ORAL SURGICAL PROCEDURES; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 12344258722     PISSN: 10556656     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1597/02-119.2.1     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Asher-McDade C, Brattström V, Dahl E, McWilliam J, Mølsted K, Plint DA, Prahl-Andersen B, Semb G, Shaw WC, The RPS. A six-center international study of treatment outcome in patients with clefts of the lip and palate: Part 4. Assessment of nasolabial appearance. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1992;29:409-412.
2. Asher-McDade C, Roberts CT, Shaw WC, Gallager C. Development of a method for rating nasolabial appearance in patients with clefts of the lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1991;28:385-391.
3. Becker M, Svensson H. Morphometry in digital photographs: a promising technique for assessing cleft lip and palate patients. Scand J Plast Reconstr Hand Surg. 1998;32:295-299.
4. Brattström V, McWilliam J, Larson O, Semb G. Craniofacial development in children with unilateral clefts of the lip, alveolus, and palate treated according to four different regimes. 1. Maxillary development. Scand J Plast Reconstr Hand Surg. 1991;25:259-267.
5. Coccaro PJ, Pruzansky S. Longitudinal study of skeletal and soft tissue profile in children with unilateral cleft lip and cleft palate. Cleft Palate J. 1965;2:1-12.
6. Dahlberg G. Statistical Methods for Medical and Biological Students. London: Georg Allen & Unwin Ltd; 1940.
7. Enemark H, Bolund S, Jørgensen I. Evaluation of unilateral cleft lip and palate treatment: long term results. Cleft Palate J. 1990;27:354-361.
8. Enemark H, Friede H, Paulin G, Semb G, Åbyholm F, Bolund S, Lilja J, Östrup L. Lip and nose morphology in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate from four Scandinavian centres. Scand J Plast Reconstr Hand Surg. 1993;27:41-47.
9. Friede H, Johanson B. A follow-up study of cleft children treated with primary bone grafting. 1. Orthodontic aspects. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1974;8:88-103.
10. Friede H, Johanson B. Adolescent facial morphology of early bone-grafted cleft lip and palate patients. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1982;16:41-53.
11. Friede H, Lilja J. Dentofacial morphology in adolescent or early adult patients with cleft lip and palate after a treatment regimen that included vomer flap surgery and pushback palatal repair. Scand J Plast Reconstr Hand Surg. 1994;28:113-121.
12. Friede H, Enemark H, Semb G, Paulin G, Åbyholm F, Bolund S, Lilja J, Östrup L. Craniofacial and occlusal characteristics in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients from four Scandinavian centres. Scand J Plast Reconstr Hand Surg. 1991;25:269-276.
13. Goldstein H. Multilevel Statistical Models. London: Arnold, 1995.
14. Grunwell P, Brønsted K, Henningson G, Jansonius K, Karling J, Meijer M, Ording U, Wyatt R, Vermeij-Zieverink E, Sell D. A six-center international study of the outcome of treatment in patients with clefts of the lip and palate: the results of a cross-linguistic investigation of cleft palate speech. Scand J Plast Reconstr Hand Surg. 2000;34:219-229.
15. Kerr WJS, Ford I. A comparison of facial form in three western European male groups. Eur J Orthod. 1986;8:106-111.
16. Kramer CY. Extension of multiple range test to group means with unequal numbers of replications. Biometrics. 1956;12:307-310.
17. Laitung JK, Coghlan BA, Pigott RW. A comparison of computer versus panel assessment of two groups of patients with cleft lip and palate. Br J Plast Surg. 1993;46:18-21.
18. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159-174.
19. Morrant DG, Shaw WC. Use of standardized video recordings to assess cleft surgery outcome. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1996;33:134-142.
20. Mølsted K, Asher-McDade C, Brattström V, Dahl E, Mars M, McWilliam J, Plint DA, Prahl-Andersen B, Semb G, Shaw WC, The RPS. A six-center international study of treatment outcome in patients with clefts of the lip and palate: Part 2. Craniofacial form and soft tissue profile. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1992;29:398-404.
21. Mølsted K, Brattström V, Prahl-Andersen B, Shaw WC, Semb G. The Eurocleft Study. Longitudinal follow-up of patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate: Part 3. Dental arch relationships. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2004;42:78-82.
22. Nordin K-E. Treatment of primary total cleft palate deformity. Preoperative orthopedic correction of the displaced components of the upper jaw in infants followed by bone grafting to the alveolar process clefts. Trans Europ Orthod Soc. 1957;333-339.
23. Palmer CR, Hamlen M, Ross RB, Lindsay WK. Cleft palate repair: comparison of the results of two surgical techniques. Can J Surg. 1969;12:32-39.
24. Paulin G, Thilander B. Dentofacial relations in young adults with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate. Scand J Plast Reconstr Hand Surg. 1991;25:63-72.
25. Ross RB. Treatment variables affecting facial growth in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate: Part 1. Treatment affecting growth. Cleft Palate J. 1987;24:5-23.
26. Semb G. A study of facial growth in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate treated by the Oslo CLP Team. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1991;28:1-21.
27. Semb G, Brattström V, Mølsted K, Prahl-Andersen B, Shaw WC. The Eurocleft Study: longitudinal follow-up of patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Part 1. Introduction and treatment experience. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2004;42:64-68.
28. Shaw WC, Brattström V, Mølsted K, Prahl-Andersen B, Semb G. The Eurocleft Study: longitudinal follow-up of patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Part 5. Discussion and conclusions. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2004;42:93-98.
29. Shaw WC, Dahl E, Asher-McDade C, Brattström V, Dahl E, Mars M, McWilliam J, Mølsted K, Plint DA, Prahl-Andersen B, Roberts C, Semb G, The RPS. A six-center international study of treatment outcome in patients with clefts of the lip and palate: Part 5. General discussion and conclusions. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1992;29:413-418.
30. Šmahel Z, Müllerová. Effects of primary periosteoplasty on facial growth in unilateral cleft lip and palate: 10-year follow-up. Cleft Palate J. 1988;25:356-361.
31. Šmahel Z, Müllerová, Nejedly A, Horak I. Changes in craniofacial development due to modifications of the treatment of unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1998;35:240-247.
32. Tobiasen JM. Scaling facial impairment. Cleft Palate J. 1989;26:249-254.
33. Trenouth MJ, Davies PH, Johnson JS. A statistical comparison of three sets of normative data from which to derive standards for craniofacial measurement. Eur J Orthod. 1985;7:193-200.