Tantalum cones for major osteolysis in revision knee replacement

Bone and Joint Journal

Volumn 95 B, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 1069-1074

  Rao, B M ^a   Kamal, T T ^a   Vafaye, J ^a   Moss, M ^a  

^a ST RICHARD S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE RADIOGRAPHY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; KNEE FUNCTION; KNEE PROSTHESIS; KNEE SOCIETY SCORE; MALE; OSTEOLYSIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OXFORD KNEE SCORE; PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTHESIS INFECTION; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; RANGE OF MOTION; TANTALUM CONE; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; WEIGHT BEARING;

EID: 84882593865     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20494408     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B8.29194     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Engh GA, Ammeen DJ. Bone loss with revision total knee arthroplasty: defect classification and alternatives for reconstruction. Instr Course Lect 1999;48:167-175.
2. Bradley GW. Revision total knee arthroplasty by impaction bone grafting. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2000;371:113-118.
3. Lotke PA, Carolan GF, Puri N. Impaction grafting for bone defects in revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006;446:99-103.
4. Suárez-Suárez MA, Murcia A, Maestro A. Filling of segmental bone defects in revision knee arthroplasty using morsellized bone grafts contained within a metal mesh. Acta Orthop Belg 2002;68:163-167.
5. Lonner JH, Lotke PA, Kim J, Nelson C. Impaction grafting and wire mesh for uncontained defects in revision knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002;404:145-151.
6. Toms AD, Barker RL, Jones RS, Kuiper JH. Impaction bone-grafting in revision joint replacement surgery. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2004;86-A:2050-2060.
7. Whiteside LA. Morsellized allografting in revision total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 1998;21:1041-1043.
8. Engh GA, Herzwurm PJ, Parks NL. Treatment of major defects of bone with bulk allografts and stemmed components during total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1997;79-A:1030-1039.
9. Tsahakis PJ, Beaver WB, Brick GW. Technique and results of allograft reconstruction in revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994;303:86-94.
10. Ghazavi MT, Stockley I, Yee G, Davis A, Gross AE. Reconstruction of massive bone defects with allograft in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1997;79-A:17-25.
11. Clatworthy MG, Ballance J, Brick GW, Chandler HP, Gross AE. The use of structural allograft for uncontained defects in revision total knee arthroplasty: a minimum five year review. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2001;83-A:404-411.
12. Backstein D, Safir O, Gross A. Management of bone loss: structural grafts in revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006;446:104-112.
13. Engh GA, Ammeen DJ. Use of structural allograft in revision total knee arthroplasty in knees with severe tibial bone loss. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2007;89-A:2640-2647.
14. Harris AI, Poddar S, Gitelis S, et al. Arthroplasty with a composite of an allograft and prosthesis for knees with severe deficiency of bone. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1995;77-A:373-386.
15. Dennis DA. The structural allograft composite in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2002;17(Suppl):90-93.
16. Jones RE, Skedros JG, Chan AJ, Beauchamp DH, Harkins PC. Total knee arthroplasty using the S-ROM mobile-bearing hinge prosthesis. J Arthroplasty 2001;16:279-287.
17. Haas SB, Insall JN, Montgomer W 3rd, Windsor RE. Revision total knee arthroplasty with use of modular components with stems inserted without cement. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1995;77-A:1700-1707.
18. Patel JV, Masonis JL, Guerin J, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH. The fate of augments to treat type-2 bone defects in revision knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2004;86-B:195-199.
19. Berend KR, Lombardi AV Jr. Distal femoral replacement in nontumor cases with severe bone loss and instability. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009;467:485-492.
20. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989;248:13-14.
21. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1998;80-B:63-69.
22. Peters CL, Erickson J, Kloepper RG, Mohr RA. Revision total knee arthroplasty with modular components inserted with metaphyseal cement and stems without cement. J Arthroplasty 2005;20:302-308.
23. Nadaud MC, Fehring TK, Fehring K. Underestimation of osteolysis in posterior stabilized total arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2004;19:110-115.
24. Rorabeck CH, Smith PN. Results of revision total knee arthroplasty in the face of significant bone deficiency. Orthop Clin North Am 1998;29:361-371.
25. Cuckler JM. Bone loss in total knee arthroplasty: graft augment and options. J Arthroplasty 2004;19(Suppl):56-58.
26. Laskin RS. Total knee arthroplasty in the presence of large bony defects of the tibia and marked knee instability. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989;248:66-70.
27. Dorr LD. Bone grafts for bone loss with total knee replacement. Orthop Clin North Am 1989;20:179-187.
28. Zatsepin ST, Burdygin VN. Replacement of the distal femur and proximal tibia with frozen allografts. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994;303:95-102.
29. Dorr LD, Ranawat CS, Sculco TA, McKaskill B, Orisek BS. Bone graft for tibial defects in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986;205:153-165.
30. Dennis DA. The structural allograft composite in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2002;17(Suppl):90-93.
31. Sutherland AG, Raafat A, Yates P, Hutchison JD. Infection associated with the use of allograft bone from the north east Scotland Bone Bank. J Hosp Infect 1997;35:215-222.
32. Tomford WW. Transmission of disease through transplantation of musculoskeletal allografts. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1995;77-A:1742-1754.
33. Bauman RD, Lewallen DG, Hanssen AD. Limitations of structural allograft in revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009;467:818-824.
34. Whiteside LA, Bicalho PS. Radiologic and histologic analysis of morselized allograft in revision total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998;357:149-156.
35. Toms AD, McClelland D, Chua L, et al. Mechanical testing of impaction bone grafting in the tibia: initial stability and design of the stem. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2005;87-B:656-663.
36. Brooks PJ, Walker PS, Scott RD. Tibial component fixation in deficient tibial bone stock. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1984;184:302-308.
37. Hockman DE, Ammeen D, Engh GA. Augments and allografts in revision total knee arthroplasty: usage and outcome using one modular revision prosthesis. J Arthroplasty 2005;20:35-41.
38. Takagi H, Iwata H, Ishiguro N, Kojima T, Oguchi T. Tibial wedge augmentation in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Rheumatol 2001;13:289-292.
39. Werle JR, Goodman SB, Imrie SN. Revision total knee arthroplasty using large distal femoral augments for severe metaphyseal bone deficiency: a preliminary study. Orthopedics 2002;25:325-327.
40. Gofton WT, Tsigaras H, Butler RA, et al. Revision total knee arthroplasty: fixation with modular stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002;404:158-168.
41. Poultsides LA, Sculco TP. Bone loss management in revision total knee replacement. Tech Orthop 2011;26:84.
42. Brand MG, Daley RJ, Ewald FC, Scott RD. Tibial tray augmentation with modular metal wedges for tibial bone stock deficiency. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989;248:71-79.
43. Tigani D, Sabbioni G, Raimondi A. Early aseptic loosening of a porous tantalum knee prosthesis. Chir Organi Mov 2009;93:187-191.
44. Bobyn JD, Stackpool GJ, Hacking SA, Tanzer M, Krygier JJ. Characteristics of bone ingrowth and interface mechanics of a new porous tantalum biomaterial. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1999;81-B:907-914.
45. Levine B, Sporer S, Della Valle CJ, Jacobs JJ, Paprosky W. Porous tantalum in reconstructive surgery of the knee: a review. J Knee Surg 2007; 20:185-194.
46. Maccauro G, Iommetti PR, Muratori F, et al. An overview about biomedical applications of micron and nano size tantalum. Recent Pat Biotechnol 2009;3:157-165.
47. Zardiackas LD, Parsell DE, Dillon LD, et al. Structure, metallurgy, and mechanical properties of a porous tantalum foam. J Biomed Mater Res 2001;58:180-187.
48. Levine BR, Sporer S, Poggie RA, Della Valle CJ, Jacobs JJ. Experimental and clinical performance of porous tantalum in orthopaedic surgery. Biomaterials 2006;27:4671-4681.
49. Schildhauer TA, Robie B, Muhr G, Köller M. Bacterial adherence to tantalum versus commonly used orthopaedic metallic implant materials. J Orthop Trauma 2006;20:476-484.
50. Jensen CL, Petersen MM, Schrøder HM, Flivik G, Lund B. Revision total knee arthroplasty with the use of trabecular metal cones: a randomized radiostereometric analysis with 2 years of follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2012;27:1820-1826.
51. Meneghini RM, Lewallen DG, Hanssen AD. Use of porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss during revision total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2008;90-A:78-84.
52. Howard JL, Kudera J, Lewallen DG, Hanssen AD. Early results of the use of tantalum femoral cones for revision total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2011;93-A:478-484.
53. Meneghini RM, Lewallen DG, Hanssen AD. Use of porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss during revision total knee replacement: surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2009;91-A(Suppl):131-138.
54. Lachiewicz PF, Bolognesi MP, Henderson RA, Soileau ES, Vail TP. Can tantalum cones provide fixation in complex revision knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012;470:199-204.
55. Long WJ, Scuderi GR. Porous tantalum cones for large metaphyseal tibial defects in revision total knee arthroplasty: a minimum 2-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2009;24:1086-1092.
56. Radnay CS, Scuderi GR. Management of bone loss: augments, cones, offset stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006;446:83-92.