Porous Tantalum in Reconstructive Surgery of the Knee

Journal of Knee Surgery

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 185-194

  Sporer, Scott ^a   Della Valle, Craig J ^a   Jacobs, Joshua J ^a   Paprosky, Wayne ^a   Levine, Brett ^b  

^a RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b Midwest Orthopaedic Center   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TANTALUM;

ANIMAL; BONE REGENERATION; CONNECTIVE TISSUE; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HUMAN; KNEE; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MATERIALS TESTING; POROSITY; PROSTHESIS; REVIEW;

ANIMALS; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; CONNECTIVE TISSUE; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MATERIALS TESTING; OSSEOINTEGRATION; POROSITY; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; TANTALUM;

EID: 34548611684     PISSN: 15388506     EISSN: 19382480     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1248041     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Back D.L., Cannon S.R., Hilton A., Bankes M.J., Briggs T.W. The Kinemax total knee arthroplasty. Nine years experience. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:359-363.
2. Barrere F., Van Cer Valk C.M., Dalmeijer R.A., Meijer G., Van Blitterswijk C.A., De Groot K., Layrolle P. Osteogenecity of octacalcium phosphate coatings applied on porous metal implants. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2003;66:779-788.
3. Barrere F., Van Der Valk C.M., Meijer G., Dalmeijer R.A., De Groot K., Layrolle P. Osteointegration of biomimetic apatite coating applied onto dense and porous metal implants in femurs of goats. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2003;67:655-665.
4. Berger R.A., Lyon J.H., Jacobs J.J., et al. Problems with ce-mentless total knee arthroplasty at 11 years follow-up. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;392:196-207.
5. Bermudez M.D., Carrion F.J., Martinez-Nicolas G., Lopez R. Erosion-corrosion of stainless steels, titanium, tantalum and zirconium. Wear. 2005;258:693-700.
6. Black J. Biological performance of tantalum. Clin Mater. 1994;16:167-173.
7. Bloebaum R.D., Bachus K.N., Jensen J.W., Hofmann A.A. Postmortem analysis of consecutively retrieved asymmetric porous-coated tibial components. J Arthroplasty. 1997;12:920-929.
8. Bobyn J.D., Hacking S.A., Krygier J.J., Harvey E.J., Little D.G., Tanzer M. Zoledronic acid causes enhancement of bone growth into porous implants. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:416-420.
9. Bobyn J.D., Pilliar R.M., Cameron H.U., Weatherly G.C. The optimum pore size for the fixation of porous-surfaced metal implants by the ingrowth of bone. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980;150:263-270.
10. Bobyn J.D., Poggie R.A., Krygier J.J., et al. Clinical validation of a structural porous tantalum biomaterial for adult reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:123-129.
11. Bobyn J.D., Stackpool G.J., Hacking S.A., Tanzer M., Krygier J.J. Characteristics of bone ingrowth and interface mechanics of a new porous tantalum biomaterial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;81:907-914.
12. Bobyn J.D., Toh K.K., Hacking S.A., Tanzer M., Krygier J.J. Tissue response to porous tantalum acetabular cups: a canine model. J Arthroplasty. 1999;14:347-354.
13. Bobyn J.D., Wilson G.J., MacGregor D.C., Pilliar R.M., Weatherly G.C. Effect of pore size on the peel strength of attachment of fibrous tissue to porous-surfaced implants. J Biomed Mater Res. 1982;16:571-584.
14. Bozic K.J., Kinder J., Meneghini R.M., Zurakowski D., Rosenberg A.G., Galante J.O. Implant survivorship and complication rates after total knee arthroplasty with a third-generation cemented system: 5 to 8 years followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;430:117-124.
15. Carlsson A., Bjorkman A., Besjakov J., Onsten I. Cemented tibial component fixation performs better than cementless fixation: a randomized radiostereometric study comparing porous-coated, hydroxyapatite-coated and cemented tibial components over 5 years. Acta Orthop. 2005;76:362-369.
16. Chalkin B., Minter J. Limb salvage and abductor reattachment using a custom prosthesis with porous tantalum components. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:127-130.
17. Cohen R. A porous tantalum trabecular metal: basic science. Am J Orthop. 2002;31:216-217.
18. Cross M.J., Parish E.N. A hydroxyapatite-coated total knee replacement: prospective analysis of 1000 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:1073-1076.
19. Gioe T.J., Killeen K.K., Grimm K., Mehle S., Scheltema K. Why are total knee replacements revised? Analysis of early revision in a community knee implant registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;428:100-106.
20. Gofton W.T., Tsigaras H., Butler R.A., Patterson J.J., Barrack R.L., Rorabeck C.H. Revision total knee arthroplas-ty: fixation with modular stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;404:158-168.
21. Goldberg V.M., Kraay M. The outcome of the cementless tibial component: a minimum 14-year clinical evaluation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;428:214-220.
22. Gordon W.J., Conzemius M.G., Birdsall E., et al. Chon-droconductive potential of tantalum trabecular metal. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2005;75:229-233.
23. Hacking S.A., Bobyn J.D., Toh K., Tanzer M., Krygier J.J. Fibrous tissue ingrowth and attachment to porous tantalum. J Biomed Mater Res. 2000;52:631-638.
24. Hofmann A.A., Evanich J.D., Ferguson R.P., Camargo M.P. Ten- to 14-year clinical follow-up of the cementless natural knee system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;388:85-94.
25. Hofmann A.A., Heithoff S.M., Camargo M. Cementless total knee arthroplasty in patients 50 years or younger. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;404:102-107.
26. Johansson C.B., Hansson H.A., Albrektsson T. Qualitative interfacial study between bone and tantalum, niobium or commercially pure titanium. Biomaterials. 1990;11:277-280.
27. Kato H., Nakamura T., Nishiguchi S., et al. Bonding of alkali- and heat-treated tantalum implants to bone. J Biomed Mater Res. 2000;53:28-35.
28. Kim H.M., Miyaji F., Kokubo T., Nakamura T. Preparation of bioactive Ti and its alloys via simple chemical surface treatment. J Biomed Mater Res. 1996;32:409-417.
29. Kokubo T. Bioactive glass ceramics: properties and applications. Biomaterials. 1991;12:155-163.
30. LaBerge M., Bobyn J.D., Rivard C.H., Drouin G., Duval P. Study of soft tissue ingrowth into canine porous coated femoral implants designed for osteosarcomas management. J Biomed Mater Res. 1990;24:959-971.
31. Landon G.C., Galante J.O., Maley M.M. Noncemented total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986;205:49-57.
32. Levi A.D., Choi W.G., Keller P.J., Heiserman J.E., Sonntag V.K., Dickman C.A. The radiographic and imaging characteristics of porous tantalum implants within the human cervical spine. Spine. 1998;23:1245-1251.
33. Mardones R.M., Reinholz G.G., Fitzsimmons J.S., et al. Development of a biologic prosthetic composite for cartilage repair. Tissue Eng. 2005;11:1368-1378.
34. Miyazaki T., Kim H.M., Kokubo T., Ohtsuki C., Kato H., Na-kamura T. Enhancement of bonding strength by graded structure at interface between apatite layer and bioactive tantalum metal. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2002;13:651-655.
35. Miyazaki T., Kim H.M., Kokubo T., Ohtsuki C., Kato H., Na-kamura T. Mechanism of bonelike apatite formation on bioactive tantalum metal in a simulated body fluid. Biomaterials. 2002;23:827-832.
36. Miyazaki T., Kim H.M., Miyaji F., Kokubo T., Kato H., Na-kamura T. Bioactive tantalum metal prepared by NaOH treatment. J Biomed Mater Res. 2000;50:35-42.
37. Nasser S., Poggie R.A. Revision and salvage patellar ar-throplasty using a porous tantalum implant. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:562-572.
38. Nelson C.L., Lonner J.H., Lahiji A., Kim J., Lotke P.A. Use of trabecular metal patella for marked patella bone loss during revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2003;18:37-41.
39. Neo M., Kotani S., Fujita Y., Nakamura T., et al. Differences in ceramic-bone interface between surface-active ceramics and resorbable ceramics: a study by scanning and transmission electron microscopy. J Biomed Mater Res. 1992;26:255-267.
40. Parker D.A., Rorabeck C.H., Bourne R.B. Long-term follow-up of cementless versus hybrid fixation for total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;388:68-76.
41. Schroder H.M. Cementless porous-coated total knee arthroplasty: 10-year results in a consecutive series. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:559-567.
42. Sidhu K.S., Prochnow T.D., Schmitt P., Fischgrund J., Weis-brode S., Herkowitz H.N. Anterior cervical interbody fusion with rhbmp-2 and tantalum in a goat model. Spine J. 2001;1:331-340.
43. Stiehl J.B. Trabecular metal in hip reconstructive surgery. Orthopedics. 2005;28:662-670.
44. Stulberg S.D. Bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty. Graft options and adjuncts. J Arthroplasty. 2003;18:48-50.
45. Sumner D.R., Kienapfel H., Jacobs J.J., Urban R.M., Turner T.M., Galante J.O. Bone ingrowth and wear debris in well-fixed cementless porous-coated tibial components removed from patients. J Arthroplasty. 1995;10:157-167.
46. Sumner D.R., Turner T.M., Dawson D., Rosenberg A.G., Urban R.M., Galante J.O. Effect of pegs and screws on bone ingrowth in cementless total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;309:150-155.
47. Tanzer M., Karabasz D., Krygier J.J., Cohen R., Bobyn J.D. The Otto Aufranc Award: bone augmentation around and within porous implants by local bisphosphonate elution. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;441:30-39.
48. Vigorita V.J., Minkowitz B., Dichiara J.F., Higham P.A. A histomorphometric and histologic analysis of the implant interface in five successful, autopsy-retrieved, noncemented porous-coated knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;293:211-218.
49. Whaley A.L., Trousdale R.T., Rand J.A., Hanssen A.D. Cemented long-stem revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2003;18:592-599.
50. Whiteside L.A. Choosing your implant: cementless, patella sparing, and posterior cruciate ligament retaining. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:10-11.
51. Whiteside L.A. Long-term follow-up of the bone ingrowth Ortholoc knee system without a metal-backed patella. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;388:77-84.
52. Zardiackas L.D., Parsell D.E., Dillon L.D., Mitchell D.W., Nunnery L.A., Poggie R. Structure, metallurgy, and mechanical properties of a porous tantalum foam. J Biomed Mater Res. 2001;58:180-187.
53. Zhang Y., Ahn P.B., Fitzpatrick D.C., Heiner A.D., Poggie R.A., Brown T.D. Interfacial frictional behavior: cancellous bone, cortical bone, and a novel porous tantalum biomaterial. J Musculoskeletal Res. 1999;3:245-251.