Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty With the Use of Trabecular Metal Cones. A Randomized Radiostereometric Analysis With 2 Years of Follow-Up

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 27, Issue 10, 2012, Pages

  Jensen, Claus L ^a   Petersen, Michael M ^a   Schrøder, Henrik M ^a   Flivik, Gunnar ^b   Lund, Bjarne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Bone loss; Randomized study; RSA; RTKA; Trabecular metal

Indexed keywords

TANTALUM;

ADULT; AGED; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; BONE DEFECT; BONE IMPLANT; BONE REGENERATION; BONE REMODELING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; ENDOPROSTHESIS LOOSENING; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MALE; MEASUREMENT; OSTEOLYSIS; RADIOSTEREOMETRIC ANALYSIS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; ROTATION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TIBIA; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TRABECULAR METAL CONE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84869086393     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.04.036     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Lewallen D.G., Fehring T.K., Dennis D.A., et al. Revision total knee arthroplasty: surgical techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009, 91(Suppl. 5):69.
2. Engh G.A., Ammeen D.J. Classification and preoperative radiographic evaluation: knee. Orthop Clin North Am 1998, 29:205.
3. Berend K.R., Lombardi A.V. Distal femoral replacement in nontumor cases with severe bone loss and instability. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009, 467:485.
4. Engh G.A., Ammeen D.J. Bone loss with revision total knee arthroplasty: defects classification and alternatives for reconstruction. Instr Course Lect 1999, 48:167.
5. Matsuno H., Yokoyama A., Watari F., et al. Biocompatibility and osteogenesis of refractory metal implants, titanium, hafnium, niobium, tantalum and rhenium. Biomaterials 2001, 22:1253.
6. Black J. Biological performance of tantalum. Clin Materials 1994, 16:167.
7. Zardiackas L.D., Parsell D.E., Dillon L.D., et al. Structure, metallurgy, and mechanical properties of a poous tantalum foam. J Biomed Mater Res 2001, 58:180.
8. Levine B.R., Sporer S., Poggie R.A., et al. Experimental and clinical performance of porous tantalum in orthopedic surgery. Biomaterials 2006, 27:4671.
9. Bobyn J.D., Stackpool G.J., Hacking S.A., et al. Characteristics of bone ingrowth and interface mechanics of a new porous tantalum biomaterial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1999, 81:907.
10. Bobyn J.D., Poggie R.A., Krygier J.J., et al. Clinical validation of a structual porous tantalum biomaterial for adult reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004, 86:123.
11. Patil N., Lee K., Goodman S.B. Porous tantalum in hip and knee reconstructive surgery. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2009, 89:242.
12. Meneghini R.M., Lewallen D.G., Hanssen A.D. Use of porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss during revision total knee replacement. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009, 91(Suppl. 2 Pt 1):131.
13. Lachiewicz P.F., Bolognesi M.P., Henderson R.A., et al. Can tantalum cones provide fixation in complex revision knee arthroplasty?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012, 470:199.
14. Radnay C.S., Scuderi G.R. Management of bone loss: augments, cones, offset stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006, 446:83.
15. Selvik G. Roentgen stereophotogrammetry. A method for the study of the kinematics of the skeletal system. Acta Orthop Scand 1989, 60(Suppl. 232):1.
16. Nelissen R.G., Pijls B.G., Karrholm J., et al. RSA and registries: the quest for phased introduction of new implants. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011, 93(Suppl. 3):62.
17. Ryd L. Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis of prosthetic fixation in the hip and knee joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1992, 56.
18. Ryd L., Albrektsson B.E., Carlsson L., et al. Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis as a predictor of mechanical loosening of knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1995, 77:377.
19. Karrholm J., Borssen B., Lowenhielm G., et al. Does early micromotion of femoral stem prostheses matter? 4-7-year stereoradiographic follow-up of 84 cemented prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1994, 76:912.
20. Valstar E.R., Gill R., Ryd L., et al. Guidelines for standardization of radiostereometry (RSA) of implants. Acta Orthop 2005, 76:563.
21. Toksvig-Larsen S., Jorn L.P., Ryd L., et al. Hydroxyapatite-enhanced tibial prosthetic fixation. Clin Orthop 2000, 370:192.
22. Ranstam J., Ryd L., Onsten I. Accurate accuracy assessment: review of basic principles. Acta Orthop Scand 2000, 71:106.
23. Ryd L., Yuan X., Lofgren H. Methods for determining the accuracy of radiostereometric analysis (RSA). Acta Orthop Scand 2000, 71:403.
24. Therbo M., Lund B., Jensen K.E., et al. Effect of bioactive coating of the tibial component on migration pattern in uncemented total knee arthroplasty: a randomized RSA study of 14 knees presented according to new RSA-guidelines. J Orthop Traumatol 2008, 9:63.
25. Kaptein B.L., Valstar E.R., Stoel B.C., et al. Clinical validation of model-based RSA for a total knee prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007, 464:205.
26. Valstar E.R., de Jong F.W., Vrooman H.A., et al. Model-based Roentgen stereophotogrammetry of orthopaedic implants. J Biomech 2001, 34:715.
27. Garling E.H., Valstar E.R., Nelissen R.G. Comparison of micromotion in mobile bearing and posterior stabilized total knee prostheses: a randomized RSA study of 40 knees followed for 2 years. Acta Orthop 2005, 76:353.
28. Onsten I., Nordqvist A., Carlsson A.S., et al. Hydroxyapatite augmentation of the porous coating improves fixation of tibial components. A randomised RSA study in 116 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998, 80:417.
29. Regner L., Carlsson L., Karrholm J., et al. Tibial component fixation in porous- and hydroxyapatite-coated total knee arthroplasty: a radiostereo metric evaluation of migration and inducible displacement after 5 years. J Arthroplasty 2000, 15:681.
30. Nilsson K.G., Karrholm J., Carlsson L., et al. Hydroxyapatite coating versus cemented fixation of the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty: prospective randomized comparison of hydroxyapatite-coated and cemented tibial components with 5-year follow-up using radiostereometry. J Arthroplasty 1999, 14:9.
31. Dunbar M.J., Wilson D.A., Hennigar A.W., et al. Fixation of a trabecular metal knee arthroplasty component. A prospective randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009, 91:1578.
32. Henricson A., Linder L., Nilsson K.G. A trabecular metal tibial component in total knee replacement in patients younger than 60 years: a two-year radiostereophotogrammetric analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008, 90:1585.