Early results of the use of tantalum femoral cones for revision total knee arthroplasty

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery

Volumn 93, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 478-484

  Howard, James L ^a   Kudera, Jeremy ^b   Lewallen, David G ^b   Hanssen, Arlen D ^b  

^a LONDON HEALTH SCIENCES CENTRE   (Canada)

^b MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE INFECTION; BONE REMODELING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; ENDOPROSTHESIS; FEMALE; FEMUR FRACTURE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; KNEE INSTABILITY; MALE; OSTEOLYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TANTALUM METAPHYSEAL CONE; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

EID: 79952369482     PISSN: 00219355     EISSN: 15351386     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.I.01322     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Engh GA. Bone defect classification. In: Engh GA, Rorabeck CH, editors. Revision total knee arthroplasty. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 1997. p 63-120.
2. Garino JP. The use of impaction grafting in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17(4 Suppl 1):94-7. (Pubitemid 34663235)
3. Lotke PA, Carolan GF, Puri N. Impaction grafting for bone defects in revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;446:99-103. (Pubitemid 44318269)
4. Bradley GW. Revision total knee arthroplasty by impaction bone grafting. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;371:113-8. (Pubitemid 30090827)
5. Engh GA, Herzwurm PJ, Parks NL. Treatment of major defects of bone with bulk allografts and stemmed components during total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:1030-9. (Pubitemid 27310573)
6. Clatworthy MG, Ballance J, Brick GW, Chandler HP, Gross AE. The use of structural allograft for uncontained defects in revision total knee arthroplasty. A minimum five-year review. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83:404-11. (Pubitemid 32221571)
7. Ghazavi MT, Stockley I, Yee G, Davis A, Gross AE. Reconstruction of massive bone defects with allograft in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:17-25. (Pubitemid 27057448)
8. Dennis DA. The structural allograft composite in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17(4 Suppl 1):90-3. (Pubitemid 34663234)
9. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;248:13-4. (Pubitemid 20204775)
10. Meneghini RM, Lewallen DG, Hanssen AD. Use of porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss during revision total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:78-84.
11. Lonner JH, Lotke PA, Kim J, Nelson C. Impaction grafting and wire mesh for uncontained defects in revision knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;404: 145-51. (Pubitemid 35351065)
12. Peersman G, Laskin R, Davis J, Peterson MG, Richart T. Prolonged operative time correlates with increased infection rate after total knee arthroplasty. HSS J. 2006;2:70-2. (Pubitemid 44421784)
13. Buck BE, Malinin TI, Brown MD. Bone transplantation and human immunodeficiency virus. An estimate of risk of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;240:129-36.
14. Radnay CS, Scuderi GR. Management of bone loss: augments, cones, offset stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;446:83-92. (Pubitemid 44318267)
15. Cohen R. A porous tantalum trabecular metal: basic science. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2002;31:216-7.
16. Bobyn JD, Poggie RA, Krygier JJ, Lewallen DG, Hanssen AD, Lewis RJ, Unger AS, O'Keefe TJ, Christie MJ, Nasser S, Wood JE, Stulberg SD, Tanzer M. Clinical validation of a structural porous tantalum biomaterial for adult reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86 Suppl 2:123-9. (Pubitemid 39628356)